Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia","doi":"10.1177/08919887251369893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251369893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251369893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I2 = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I2 = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.

艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰治疗阿尔茨海默病躁动的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:躁动是阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者中一种常见且令人痛苦的神经精神症状,通常会导致照顾者负担增加、制度化和医疗费用增加。虽然抗精神病药物通常被开处方,但出于安全考虑,它们的使用受到限制。选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),如西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰,已成为具有更有利的安全性的替代治疗方案。本研究旨在评估这些药物在AD躁动治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:我们对比较西酞普兰或艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂或其他药物治疗老年AD伴临床躁动的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要结果包括躁动严重程度的变化,由神经精神病学量表-临床医师评分(NPI-C)和神经行为评定量表(NBRS)评估。次要结局包括认知功能(MMSE)、焦虑症状和不良事件。采用随机效应模型合并标准化平均差(SMD)和风险比(RR)。结果纳入4项随机对照试验,共502例患者。合并分析显示躁动严重程度(SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I2 = 98.3%)或认知结果(SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41)无显著改善。两组间严重不良事件发生率(RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45)和停药率(RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37)相似。然而,SSRI使用与跌倒风险增加相关(RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I2 = 0%)。结论艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰不能显著减少AD患者的躁动,但耐受性良好。增加跌倒风险需要谨慎临床使用。普洛斯佩罗协议号crd420251055237。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信