Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Luciano Falcão, Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Maria da Vitória Santos Nascimento, Marianna Leite, Mariana Lee Han, Daniel Gonçalves Quiroga, Eryvelton de Souza Franco, Maria Bernadete de Sousa Maia","doi":"10.1177/08919887251369893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I<sup>2</sup> = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251369893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251369893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundAgitation is a frequent and distressing neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), often leading to increased caregiver burden, institutionalization, and healthcare costs. While antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, their use is limited by safety concerns. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram and escitalopram, have emerged as alternative treatments with a more favorable safety profile. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the management of agitation in AD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing citalopram or escitalopram with placebo or other pharmacological treatments in older adults with AD and clinically defined agitation. Primary outcomes included changes in agitation severity, assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Clinician Rating (NPI-C) and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS). Secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE), anxiety symptoms, and adverse events. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFour RCTs comprising 502 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant improvement in agitation severity (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -2.58, 1.25; I2 = 98.3%) or cognitive outcomes (SMD 2.43; 95% CI -2.55, 7.41). Rates of serious adverse events (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.50, 1.45) and treatment discontinuation (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80, 1.37) were similar between groups. However, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of falls (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15, 2.75; I2 = 0%).ConclusionEscitalopram and citalopram do not significantly reduce agitation in AD but are generally well tolerated. Increased fall risk warrants cautious clinical use.Registration PROSPERO protocol numberCRD420251055237.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.