Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117
Victor J M Zeijen, Martijn J Tilly, Kari A Saville, Bruno H C Stricker, Isabella Kardys, M Kamran Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Joost Daemen
{"title":"Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in comparison to a population-based cohort: a propensity-matching approach.","authors":"Victor J M Zeijen, Martijn J Tilly, Kari A Saville, Bruno H C Stricker, Isabella Kardys, M Kamran Ikram, Maryam Kavousi, Joost Daemen","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P  = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P  < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P  < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P  = 0.55].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"1832-1840"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term changes in risk of cardiovascular outcomes and blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients treated with renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based cohort.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included patients with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) at least 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg. Patients treated with RDN were matched to hypertensive controls from the population-based Rotterdam Study using one-to-many variable-ratio propensity score matching. The primary safety outcome was a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, renal failure and mortality. The primary efficacy outcome was the 5-year change in office SBP.

Results: A total of 53 RDN patients were matched to 238 population-based controls. Median age [25th-75th percentile] was 60.5 [56.5-68.4] years (46% female). Baseline BP ±SD was 166.1/95.5 ± 20.6/10.9 mmHg. Patients were prescribed 2.8 [1.5-4.5] defined daily dosages of antihypertensive drugs. The incidence of the primary safety outcome was similar among the RDN group and the control group at 5 years [13 vs. 18%; hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-2.38; P  = 0.87]. The 5-year change in SBP was -12.0 [-18.0, -6.0] mmHg in the RDN group ( P  < 0.001) and -14.9 [-22.5 to -7.3] mmHg in the control group ( P  < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference [2.9 (-6.6 to 12.4) mmHg; P  = 0.55].

Conclusion: Patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing RDN did not have a significantly lower risk for future adverse cardiovascular events as compared to hypertensive controls from a population-based study. No difference in office BP was observed at 5 years. While real-world observational data could provide valuable insights, randomized trials are needed to confirm the role of RDN in improving long-term outcomes.

与以人群为基础的队列比较,肾交感神经去支配的长期安全性和有效性:倾向匹配方法。
目的:通过一项基于人群的队列研究,评估接受肾交感神经去支配(RDN)治疗的高血压患者心血管结局和血压(BP)风险的长期变化。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了收缩压(SBP)至少140 mmHg和/或舒张压至少90 mmHg的患者。采用一对多可变比倾向评分匹配方法,将接受RDN治疗的患者与基于人群的鹿特丹研究中的高血压对照组进行匹配。主要安全性终点是心肌梗死、冠状动脉血运重建术、中风、肾功能衰竭和死亡率的复合终点。主要疗效指标为办公室收缩压的5年变化。结果:共有53例RDN患者与238例基于人群的对照组相匹配。中位年龄[25 -75百分位]为60.5[56.5-68.4]岁(46%为女性)。基线BP±SD为166.1/95.5±20.6/10.9 mmHg。患者每日服用2.8[1.5-4.5]剂量的降压药。5年时,RDN组和对照组的主要安全结局发生率相似[13 vs. 18%;风险比0.93;95%置信区间(CI) 0.36 ~ 2.38;p = 0.87]。RDN组5年收缩压变化为-12.0 [-18.0,-6.0]mmHg (P结论:与基于人群的高血压对照组相比,接受RDN治疗的未控制高血压患者未来发生不良心血管事件的风险并未显著降低。5年时办公室血压无差异。虽然真实世界的观察数据可以提供有价值的见解,但需要随机试验来证实RDN在改善长期预后方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信