Don't Call Them "Unclean" Or "Unkempt": Analyzing the Harmful Direct and Indirect Effects of Opioid Stigma Marks on Stigmatizing Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Victoria A Ledford
{"title":"Don't Call Them \"Unclean\" Or \"Unkempt\": Analyzing the Harmful Direct and Indirect Effects of Opioid Stigma Marks on Stigmatizing Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions.","authors":"Victoria A Ledford","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2025.2552949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effects of opioid stigma marks (e.g. \"dirty,\" \"unclean\") on stigma-related outcomes among a sample of Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (<i>N</i> = 371). Using a 2 (stigma mark: yes, no) by 3 (opioid type: prescription opioid, heroin, fentanyl) between subjects factorial experiment, results indicated that compared to those in the no mark conditions, participants in the mark conditions expressed greater desire for social distance from and behavioral regulation of people with opioid use disorders. Opioid stigma marks were also indirectly associated with more behavioral regulation, more stigma message sharing, and less support for opioid-related public health policies through stigma beliefs. Results advance theoretical understandings of the stigma message effects process and offer practical recommendations for public health communicators and journalists.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2552949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of opioid stigma marks (e.g. "dirty," "unclean") on stigma-related outcomes among a sample of Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (N = 371). Using a 2 (stigma mark: yes, no) by 3 (opioid type: prescription opioid, heroin, fentanyl) between subjects factorial experiment, results indicated that compared to those in the no mark conditions, participants in the mark conditions expressed greater desire for social distance from and behavioral regulation of people with opioid use disorders. Opioid stigma marks were also indirectly associated with more behavioral regulation, more stigma message sharing, and less support for opioid-related public health policies through stigma beliefs. Results advance theoretical understandings of the stigma message effects process and offer practical recommendations for public health communicators and journalists.

不要叫他们“不干净”或“不整洁”:分析阿片类药物污名标记对污名态度和行为意图的直接和间接有害影响。
本研究考察了阿片类药物耻辱标记的影响(例如:“肮脏”,“不干净”)对亚马逊土耳其机械工人样本(N = 371)中耻辱相关结果的影响。采用2(污名标记:是、否)× 3(阿片类药物类型:处方阿片类药物、海洛因、芬太尼)的被试因子实验,结果表明,与无标记条件下相比,标记条件下被试对阿片类药物使用障碍患者的社交距离和行为调节表现出更大的渴望。阿片类药物耻辱标记也间接与更多的行为调节、更多的耻辱信息分享以及通过耻辱信念对阿片类药物相关公共卫生政策的更少支持相关。研究结果促进了对污名化信息影响过程的理论理解,并为公共卫生传播者和新闻工作者提供了实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信