Efficacy and toxicity of PARP inhibitor in elderly patients with homologous recombination-deficient newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: the role of dose modification.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ji Hyun Kim, Dongkyu Eugene Kim, Uisuk Kim, Jae Kyung Bae, Wan Hu Jin, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim
{"title":"Efficacy and toxicity of PARP inhibitor in elderly patients with homologous recombination-deficient newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: the role of dose modification.","authors":"Ji Hyun Kim, Dongkyu Eugene Kim, Uisuk Kim, Jae Kyung Bae, Wan Hu Jin, Sang-Yoon Park, Myong Cheol Lim","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of age on the progression-free survival (PFS) and dose modification, discontinuation and adverse events of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy in homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) ovarian cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 324 patients with advanced stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had either BRCA mutation or HRD between July 2019 and November 2022. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of PARPis by comparing PFS between patients who received PARPis and those who did not, specifically within 2 age groups: patients aged <60 years and those aged ≥60 years. The secondary objective included evaluating the rates of dose modification, discontinuation, and occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events in patients who used PARPis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 324 patients, 139 patients (42.9%) were diagnosed at ≥60 years. The use of PARPis resulted in a significant improvement in PFS in both age groups (hazard ratio [HR]=0.37; p<0.01) for patients aged <60 years (HR=0.41; p<0.01) for those aged ≥60 years. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed no significant difference in the PFS benefit between the 2 age groups (HR=0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65-1.37; p=0.76). Dose modifications were more frequent in the elderly cohort (63.9% vs. 46.5%; p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PARPis significantly improved PFS in elderly ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutations and HRD, with a toxicity profile similar to that of younger patients. Elderly patients benefited from frequent dose modifications without any negative impact on PFS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of age on the progression-free survival (PFS) and dose modification, discontinuation and adverse events of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy in homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) ovarian cancer patients.

Methods: We analyzed 324 patients with advanced stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had either BRCA mutation or HRD between July 2019 and November 2022. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of PARPis by comparing PFS between patients who received PARPis and those who did not, specifically within 2 age groups: patients aged <60 years and those aged ≥60 years. The secondary objective included evaluating the rates of dose modification, discontinuation, and occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events in patients who used PARPis.

Results: Of the 324 patients, 139 patients (42.9%) were diagnosed at ≥60 years. The use of PARPis resulted in a significant improvement in PFS in both age groups (hazard ratio [HR]=0.37; p<0.01) for patients aged <60 years (HR=0.41; p<0.01) for those aged ≥60 years. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed no significant difference in the PFS benefit between the 2 age groups (HR=0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65-1.37; p=0.76). Dose modifications were more frequent in the elderly cohort (63.9% vs. 46.5%; p=0.04).

Conclusion: PARPis significantly improved PFS in elderly ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutations and HRD, with a toxicity profile similar to that of younger patients. Elderly patients benefited from frequent dose modifications without any negative impact on PFS outcomes.

PARP抑制剂在老年同源重组缺陷新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者中的疗效和毒性:剂量调整的作用。
目的:探讨年龄对同源重组缺陷(HRD)卵巢癌患者无进展生存期(PFS)及PARPi维持治疗剂量调整、停药及不良事件的影响。方法:我们分析了324例晚期III-IV期上皮性卵巢癌患者,这些患者在2019年7月至2022年11月期间患有BRCA突变或HRD。主要目的是通过比较接受PARPis和未接受PARPis患者的PFS来评估PARPis的疗效,特别是在2个年龄组中:患者年龄结果:在324例患者中,139例患者(42.9%)被诊断为≥60岁。使用PARPis可显著改善两组患者的PFS(风险比[HR]=0.37);结论:PARPis可显著改善BRCA突变合并HRD的老年卵巢癌患者的PFS,其毒性与年轻患者相似。老年患者受益于频繁的剂量调整,对PFS结果没有任何负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信