Evaluation of local anesthetic blockade in cats undergoing castration in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter setting: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1177/1098612X251347947
Elizabeth A Berliner, Martha E Stone, Scarlett Boulting, Janet Scarlett
{"title":"Evaluation of local anesthetic blockade in cats undergoing castration in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter setting: a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Elizabeth A Berliner, Martha E Stone, Scarlett Boulting, Janet Scarlett","doi":"10.1177/1098612X251347947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe objective of this prospective study was to compare the nociceptive blunting and analgesic efficacy of two different local anesthetic solutions (lidocaine and a mixture of lidocaine plus bupivacaine) and a placebo for cat castrations in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter (HQHVSN) clinic as an adjunct to standard HQHVSN anesthetic protocols.MethodsA total of 88 healthy, shelter-owned male cats presenting to an HQHVSN clinic in the northeastern USA between August 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled in this blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cats were randomized to receive an intratesticular injection of saline placebo (SP group; n = 32), lidocaine 1 mg/kg (L group; n = 34) or a mixture of lidocaine 1 mg/kg and bupivacaine 1 mg/kg (LB group; n = 22) before routine castration. Other than the use of randomized local anesthetic blocks, all standard HQHVSN protocols for anesthesia and surgery were followed. Measured variables included perioperative heart rates, surgeon satisfaction with anesthetic depth, surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and the rate of incisional complications.ResultsTreatment groups did not differ in demographic characteristics or baseline heart rate. Percent increase in intraoperative heart rate was significantly larger in cats in the SP group than in the L (<i>P</i> <0.001) and LB groups (<i>P</i> <0.001); the L and LB groups did not differ from each other (<i>P</i> = 0.457). Surgeon-reported unsatisfactory anesthetic depth occurred more frequently in the SP group (<i>z</i> = 2.68, <i>P</i> = 0.044). Surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and incision complication rates were statistically similar between groups.Conclusions and relevanceThis study is the first to assess the efficacy of local anesthesia for feline castration in an HQHVSN environment, where sustainable operations require delivering humane care with optimal efficiency and resource management. Despite the brief interval between intratesticular anesthetic administration and auto-ligation of the second testicle (median 5 mins, interquartile range 3-7), local anesthesia significantly reduced nociception compared with placebo and did not increase the incidence of incisional complications. These perioperative advantages support incorporating local blocks into multimodal anesthesia and analgesia protocols in HQHVSN clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":"27 8","pages":"1098612X251347947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X251347947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective of this prospective study was to compare the nociceptive blunting and analgesic efficacy of two different local anesthetic solutions (lidocaine and a mixture of lidocaine plus bupivacaine) and a placebo for cat castrations in a high-quality, high-volume spay/neuter (HQHVSN) clinic as an adjunct to standard HQHVSN anesthetic protocols.MethodsA total of 88 healthy, shelter-owned male cats presenting to an HQHVSN clinic in the northeastern USA between August 2019 and October 2020 were enrolled in this blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cats were randomized to receive an intratesticular injection of saline placebo (SP group; n = 32), lidocaine 1 mg/kg (L group; n = 34) or a mixture of lidocaine 1 mg/kg and bupivacaine 1 mg/kg (LB group; n = 22) before routine castration. Other than the use of randomized local anesthetic blocks, all standard HQHVSN protocols for anesthesia and surgery were followed. Measured variables included perioperative heart rates, surgeon satisfaction with anesthetic depth, surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and the rate of incisional complications.ResultsTreatment groups did not differ in demographic characteristics or baseline heart rate. Percent increase in intraoperative heart rate was significantly larger in cats in the SP group than in the L (P <0.001) and LB groups (P <0.001); the L and LB groups did not differ from each other (P = 0.457). Surgeon-reported unsatisfactory anesthetic depth occurred more frequently in the SP group (z = 2.68, P = 0.044). Surgeon satisfaction with tissue quality, postoperative pain scores and incision complication rates were statistically similar between groups.Conclusions and relevanceThis study is the first to assess the efficacy of local anesthesia for feline castration in an HQHVSN environment, where sustainable operations require delivering humane care with optimal efficiency and resource management. Despite the brief interval between intratesticular anesthetic administration and auto-ligation of the second testicle (median 5 mins, interquartile range 3-7), local anesthesia significantly reduced nociception compared with placebo and did not increase the incidence of incisional complications. These perioperative advantages support incorporating local blocks into multimodal anesthesia and analgesia protocols in HQHVSN clinics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在高质量、高容量的阉割/绝育环境中,评估局部麻醉阻滞对阉割猫的影响:一项随机、盲法、安慰剂对照试验。
本前瞻性研究的目的是比较两种不同的局部麻醉溶液(利多卡因和利多卡因加布比卡因的混合物)和安慰剂作为标准HQHVSN麻醉方案的辅助方案,在高质量,大容量放养/阉割(HQHVSN)诊所中用于猫阉割的伤害性钝化和镇痛效果。方法在2019年8月至2020年10月期间,共有88只健康的、收容所养的公猫被纳入这项盲法、随机、安慰剂对照试验。猫在常规去势前随机接受睾丸内注射生理盐水安慰剂(SP组,n = 32)、利多卡因1 mg/kg (L组,n = 34)或利多卡因1 mg/kg与布比卡因1 mg/kg的混合物(LB组,n = 22)。除使用随机局麻块外,所有标准HQHVSN麻醉和手术方案均被遵循。测量变量包括围手术期心率、外科医生对麻醉深度的满意度、外科医生对组织质量的满意度、术后疼痛评分和切口并发症的发生率。结果治疗组在人口统计学特征和基线心率方面没有差异。SP组猫术中心率的增加百分比明显大于L组(P P P = 0.457)。SP组医生报告的麻醉深度不满意发生率更高(z = 2.68, P = 0.044)。两组间外科医生对组织质量的满意度、术后疼痛评分和切口并发症发生率均有统计学差异。本研究首次评估了在HQHVSN环境下局部麻醉对猫去势的疗效,在这种环境下,可持续的手术需要提供具有最佳效率和资源管理的人性化护理。尽管睾丸内麻醉和第二睾丸自动结扎之间的时间间隔很短(中位5分钟,四分位数范围3-7),但与安慰剂相比,局部麻醉显著减少了伤害感,并且没有增加切口并发症的发生率。这些围手术期优势支持在HQHVSN诊所将局部阻滞纳入多模式麻醉和镇痛方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信