Dingyi Niu, Zijian Xie, Jiaqi Liu, Chen Wang, Ze Zhang
{"title":"Visual Word Segmentation Cues in Tibetan Reading: Comparing Dictionary-Based and Psychological Word Segmentation.","authors":"Dingyi Niu, Zijian Xie, Jiaqi Liu, Chen Wang, Ze Zhang","doi":"10.3390/jemr18040033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study utilized eye-tracking technology to explore the role of visual word segmentation cues in Tibetan reading, with a particular focus on the effects of dictionary-based and psychological word segmentation on reading and lexical recognition. The experiment employed a 2 × 3 design, comparing six conditions: normal sentences, dictionary word segmentation (spaces), psychological word segmentation (spaces), normal sentences (green), dictionary word segmentation (color alternation), and psychological word segmentation (color alternation). The results revealed that word segmentation with spaces (whether dictionary-based or psychological) significantly improved reading efficiency and lexical recognition, whereas color alternation showed no substantial facilitative effect. Psychological and dictionary word segmentation performed similarly across most metrics, though psychological segmentation slightly outperformed in specific indicators (e.g., sentence reading time and number of fixations), and dictionary word segmentation slightly outperformed in other indicators (e.g., average saccade amplitude and number of regressions). The study further suggests that Tibetan reading may involve cognitive processes at different levels, and the basic units of different levels of cognitive processes may not be consistent. These findings hold significant implications for understanding the cognitive processes involved in Tibetan reading and for optimizing the presentation of Tibetan text.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":"18 4","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr18040033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study utilized eye-tracking technology to explore the role of visual word segmentation cues in Tibetan reading, with a particular focus on the effects of dictionary-based and psychological word segmentation on reading and lexical recognition. The experiment employed a 2 × 3 design, comparing six conditions: normal sentences, dictionary word segmentation (spaces), psychological word segmentation (spaces), normal sentences (green), dictionary word segmentation (color alternation), and psychological word segmentation (color alternation). The results revealed that word segmentation with spaces (whether dictionary-based or psychological) significantly improved reading efficiency and lexical recognition, whereas color alternation showed no substantial facilitative effect. Psychological and dictionary word segmentation performed similarly across most metrics, though psychological segmentation slightly outperformed in specific indicators (e.g., sentence reading time and number of fixations), and dictionary word segmentation slightly outperformed in other indicators (e.g., average saccade amplitude and number of regressions). The study further suggests that Tibetan reading may involve cognitive processes at different levels, and the basic units of different levels of cognitive processes may not be consistent. These findings hold significant implications for understanding the cognitive processes involved in Tibetan reading and for optimizing the presentation of Tibetan text.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,