Microbiological Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Protaetia brevitarsis (White-Spotted Flower Chafer) Larvae Reared on Oak Sawdust and Spent Mushroom Substrate
IF 2.8 4区 农林科学Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
{"title":"Microbiological Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Protaetia brevitarsis (White-Spotted Flower Chafer) Larvae Reared on Oak Sawdust and Spent Mushroom Substrate","authors":"K.M. Park , S.Y. Kim , Y.S. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we investigated the microbial quality and bacterial diversity in <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae reared on different substrates (spent mushrooms and oak sawdust). The microbiological quality of the rearing substrates differed significantly. Total viable counts (TVC) did not differ between oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates, whereas coliforms (4.3 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) and <em>Bacillus cereus</em> group (3.9 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) were lower in the mushroom-based substrate. The drying process markedly improved microbial quality, reducing total viable counts from 9.4 to 9.1 to 7.3–4.0 log CFU/g and lowering <em>B. cereus</em> group, coliform, and fungi to near or below detection levels (<1 log CFU/g). Major pathogens were not detected in dried larvae. Comparative analyses at the phylum, genus, and species levels revealed distinct microbial profiles between substrates and larval guts. Substrate microbiota were dominated by environmental taxa, whereas larval guts were enriched in host-associated genera such as <em>Citrobacter, Dysgonomonas</em>, <em>Bacteroides</em>, and <em>Lactococcus</em>, and species including <em>Proteiniphilum acetatigenes</em> and <em>Massilibacteroides vaginae</em>. These patterns indicate a host-driven selection of gut microbiota during larval development, consistent across both oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates. Both mushroom-based and oak sawdust substrates proved microbiologically safe for rearing <em>P. brevitarsis</em> larvae, with slightly lower microbial loads observed in the mushroom-based group. In addition, mushroom-based substrates promoted beneficial gut bacteria and offered sustainable reuse of agricultural byproducts. These findings highlight the potential of substrate selection to improve edible insect safety and support circular economy practices, reinforcing the role of <em>P. brevitarsis</em> as a sustainable protein source.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 10","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the microbial quality and bacterial diversity in P. brevitarsis larvae reared on different substrates (spent mushrooms and oak sawdust). The microbiological quality of the rearing substrates differed significantly. Total viable counts (TVC) did not differ between oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates, whereas coliforms (4.3 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) and Bacillus cereus group (3.9 vs. 3.0 log CFU/g) were lower in the mushroom-based substrate. The drying process markedly improved microbial quality, reducing total viable counts from 9.4 to 9.1 to 7.3–4.0 log CFU/g and lowering B. cereus group, coliform, and fungi to near or below detection levels (<1 log CFU/g). Major pathogens were not detected in dried larvae. Comparative analyses at the phylum, genus, and species levels revealed distinct microbial profiles between substrates and larval guts. Substrate microbiota were dominated by environmental taxa, whereas larval guts were enriched in host-associated genera such as Citrobacter, Dysgonomonas, Bacteroides, and Lactococcus, and species including Proteiniphilum acetatigenes and Massilibacteroides vaginae. These patterns indicate a host-driven selection of gut microbiota during larval development, consistent across both oak sawdust and mushroom-based substrates. Both mushroom-based and oak sawdust substrates proved microbiologically safe for rearing P. brevitarsis larvae, with slightly lower microbial loads observed in the mushroom-based group. In addition, mushroom-based substrates promoted beneficial gut bacteria and offered sustainable reuse of agricultural byproducts. These findings highlight the potential of substrate selection to improve edible insect safety and support circular economy practices, reinforcing the role of P. brevitarsis as a sustainable protein source.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.