Influence of Drilling Protocol on Primary Implant Stability Depending on Different Bone Qualities and Implant Macro-Designs, Lengths, and Diameters.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Milan Stoilov, Ramin Shafaghi, Lea Stoilov, Helmut Stark, Michael Marder, Norbert Enkling, Dominik Kraus
{"title":"Influence of Drilling Protocol on Primary Implant Stability Depending on Different Bone Qualities and Implant Macro-Designs, Lengths, and Diameters.","authors":"Milan Stoilov, Ramin Shafaghi, Lea Stoilov, Helmut Stark, Michael Marder, Norbert Enkling, Dominik Kraus","doi":"10.3390/jfb16080296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary implant stability is a critical factor for successful osseointegration and long-term implant success. This study investigates the impact of drilling protocol modifications on primary stability, considering different bone qualities and implant macro-designs, lengths, and diameters.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Three implant designs-two parallel-walled and one tapered-were tested with diameters ranging from 3.4 to 5.2 mm and lengths from 7.5 to 14.5 mm. Implants were placed in polyurethane foam blocks simulating different bone densities (10, 15, 25, and 35 PCF). A standard drilling protocol was used in all groups, with modifications based on bone quality: overpreparation in dense bone and underpreparation in softer bone. Primary stability was evaluated using insertion torque (IT). The optimal IT range was defined as 25-50 Ncm, based on clinical guidelines for immediate loading. The influence of drilling protocol adaptations on stability parameters was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insertion torque was primarily influenced by bone density and implant diameter, with implant length playing a minor role. In dense bone (D1, D2), underpreparation improved torque values, especially in smaller implants, while overpreparation reduced them. The highest torques occurred with 5.2 mm implants, sometimes exceeding 80 Ncm. Standard protocols did not consistently achieve optimal torque across implant types. In soft bone (D3), underpreparation-particularly with tapered implants-was modestly beneficial. In very soft bone (D4), none of the protocols reliably reached the desired torque range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adapting drilling protocols to bone density improves insertion torque, especially with wider implants and in denser bone. Underpreparation is generally more effective than overpreparation. However, in very soft bone, neither implant geometry nor drilling adaptations reliably achieve optimal primary stability, highlighting the need for additional strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary implant stability is a critical factor for successful osseointegration and long-term implant success. This study investigates the impact of drilling protocol modifications on primary stability, considering different bone qualities and implant macro-designs, lengths, and diameters.

Material and methods: Three implant designs-two parallel-walled and one tapered-were tested with diameters ranging from 3.4 to 5.2 mm and lengths from 7.5 to 14.5 mm. Implants were placed in polyurethane foam blocks simulating different bone densities (10, 15, 25, and 35 PCF). A standard drilling protocol was used in all groups, with modifications based on bone quality: overpreparation in dense bone and underpreparation in softer bone. Primary stability was evaluated using insertion torque (IT). The optimal IT range was defined as 25-50 Ncm, based on clinical guidelines for immediate loading. The influence of drilling protocol adaptations on stability parameters was assessed.

Results: Insertion torque was primarily influenced by bone density and implant diameter, with implant length playing a minor role. In dense bone (D1, D2), underpreparation improved torque values, especially in smaller implants, while overpreparation reduced them. The highest torques occurred with 5.2 mm implants, sometimes exceeding 80 Ncm. Standard protocols did not consistently achieve optimal torque across implant types. In soft bone (D3), underpreparation-particularly with tapered implants-was modestly beneficial. In very soft bone (D4), none of the protocols reliably reached the desired torque range.

Conclusions: Adapting drilling protocols to bone density improves insertion torque, especially with wider implants and in denser bone. Underpreparation is generally more effective than overpreparation. However, in very soft bone, neither implant geometry nor drilling adaptations reliably achieve optimal primary stability, highlighting the need for additional strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同骨质量和种植体宏观设计、长度和直径的钻孔方案对初级种植体稳定性的影响。
背景:初级种植体的稳定性是骨整合和长期种植体成功的关键因素。考虑到不同的骨质量和种植体宏观设计、长度和直径,本研究探讨了钻孔方案修改对初级稳定性的影响。材料和方法:测试了三种种植体设计-两种平行壁和一种锥形-直径从3.4到5.2毫米,长度从7.5到14.5毫米。植入物放置在模拟不同骨密度(10、15、25和35 PCF)的聚氨酯泡沫块中。所有组均采用标准钻孔方案,并根据骨质量进行修改:致密骨准备过度,软骨准备不足。使用插入扭矩(IT)评估初级稳定性。根据立即加载的临床指南,最佳IT范围被定义为25-50 Ncm。评估了钻井方案调整对稳定性参数的影响。结果:植入扭矩主要受骨密度和种植体直径的影响,种植体长度影响较小。在致密骨(D1, D2)中,未充分准备提高了扭矩值,尤其是在较小的种植体中,而过度准备则降低了扭矩值。5.2 mm植入物的扭矩最大,有时超过80 Ncm。标准方案在不同种植体类型间不能一致地获得最佳扭矩。在软骨(D3)中,未充分准备——尤其是锥形种植体——是适度有益的。在非常软的骨(D4)中,没有一种方案能够可靠地达到所需的扭矩范围。结论:适应骨密度的钻孔方案可以提高插入扭矩,特别是对于更宽的种植体和更致密的骨。准备不足通常比准备过度更有效。然而,在非常软的骨中,无论是植入物的几何形状还是钻孔适应性都不能可靠地获得最佳的初级稳定性,这就突出了对其他策略的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信