Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive and Self-Etching Resin Cements to Dentin for Indirect Restorations.

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Janet Kirilova, Georgi Veselinov Iliev, Sevda Yantcheva, Elitsa Deliverska, Viktoria Petrova
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive and Self-Etching Resin Cements to Dentin for Indirect Restorations.","authors":"Janet Kirilova, Georgi Veselinov Iliev, Sevda Yantcheva, Elitsa Deliverska, Viktoria Petrova","doi":"10.3390/jfb16080289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed and compared the shear bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements for indirect aesthetic restorations to dentin. Four different materials, lithium disilicate ceramics, zirconia ceramics, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composites, and hybrid materials, were used for indirect restorations cemented to dentin. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in shear bond strength between the investigated materials. Eighty extracted human molars were used. Eighty dentin specimens with a flat surface were prepared and randomly distributed in groups of 10 (n = 10). From each material (Cerasmart 270, Initial LiSi Blok, Katana ZR Noritake, and Crowntec Next Dent), 20 blocks were made and cemented to the dentin samples. Half of the blocks from each material were cemented to dentin using self-etching resin cement (Panavia V5), and the other half using self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). After the specimens were prepared, a laboratory test was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength. The fracture type was determined using a light microscope, and SEM confirmed the results. The results were statistically analysed. All materials cemented with self-etching cements (Panavia V5) showed statistically higher shear strength values than those cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). In the specimen groups where self-adhesive cement (i-CEM) was used, Cerasmart 270 bonded statistically better. A statistical difference was found between all groups of materials cemented with self-etching cement. The Initial LiSi Block showed the strongest bond, followed by Katana Zr Noritake, Crowntec NextDent, and Cerasmart 270. Adhesion fracture to dentin was observed for all groups cemented with i-CEM. This study highlights the superior performance of self-etching cements in terms of shear bond strength. 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP), a functional monomer, was found to enhance adhesion strength significantly. However, using self-adhesive cements was associated with a weaker bond to dentin, highlighting the importance of the right cementing agent in restorative dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":15767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16080289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed and compared the shear bond strength of self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements for indirect aesthetic restorations to dentin. Four different materials, lithium disilicate ceramics, zirconia ceramics, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) composites, and hybrid materials, were used for indirect restorations cemented to dentin. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences in shear bond strength between the investigated materials. Eighty extracted human molars were used. Eighty dentin specimens with a flat surface were prepared and randomly distributed in groups of 10 (n = 10). From each material (Cerasmart 270, Initial LiSi Blok, Katana ZR Noritake, and Crowntec Next Dent), 20 blocks were made and cemented to the dentin samples. Half of the blocks from each material were cemented to dentin using self-etching resin cement (Panavia V5), and the other half using self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). After the specimens were prepared, a laboratory test was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength. The fracture type was determined using a light microscope, and SEM confirmed the results. The results were statistically analysed. All materials cemented with self-etching cements (Panavia V5) showed statistically higher shear strength values than those cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (i-CEM). In the specimen groups where self-adhesive cement (i-CEM) was used, Cerasmart 270 bonded statistically better. A statistical difference was found between all groups of materials cemented with self-etching cement. The Initial LiSi Block showed the strongest bond, followed by Katana Zr Noritake, Crowntec NextDent, and Cerasmart 270. Adhesion fracture to dentin was observed for all groups cemented with i-CEM. This study highlights the superior performance of self-etching cements in terms of shear bond strength. 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP), a functional monomer, was found to enhance adhesion strength significantly. However, using self-adhesive cements was associated with a weaker bond to dentin, highlighting the importance of the right cementing agent in restorative dentistry.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

间接修复中自粘自蚀树脂与牙本质的剪切结合强度研究。
本研究评估并比较了自粘树脂和自蚀刻树脂在牙本质间接美学修复中的剪切结合强度。四种不同的材料,二硅酸锂陶瓷,氧化锆陶瓷,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)复合材料和混合材料,用于牙本质的间接修复。原假设是在所研究的材料之间没有剪切粘结强度的差异。使用80颗拔除的人磨牙。制备表面平整的牙本质标本80份,每10组随机分配。从每种材料(Cerasmart 270、Initial LiSi block、Katana ZR Noritake和Crowntec Next Dent)中,制作20个块并将其粘合到牙本质样品上。每种材料的一半块使用自蚀刻树脂水泥(Panavia V5)粘合到牙本质上,另一半使用自粘树脂水泥(i-CEM)。试件制备完成后,进行室内剪切强度试验。用光镜确定断口类型,扫描电镜证实了结果。对结果进行统计学分析。用自蚀刻胶结剂(Panavia V5)胶结的所有材料的抗剪强度均高于用自粘树脂胶结剂(i-CEM)胶结的材料。在使用自粘水泥(i-CEM)的标本组中,Cerasmart 270的粘合性能在统计学上更好。用自蚀刻水泥胶结的所有材料组之间存在统计学差异。结合最强的是Initial LiSi Block,其次是Katana Zr Noritake、Crowntec NextDent和Cerasmart 270。所有i-CEM粘接组均观察到牙本质粘连断裂。本研究强调了自蚀刻水泥在剪切粘结强度方面的优越性能。10-甲基丙烯酰氧癸基磷酸二氢(10-MDP)是一种功能单体,能显著提高材料的粘附强度。然而,使用自粘胶粘剂与牙本质的结合较弱,这突出了正确的胶粘剂在修复牙科中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Journal of Functional Biomaterials Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Functional Biomaterials (JFB, ISSN 2079-4983) is an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes regular research papers (articles), reviews and short communications about applications of materials for biomedical use. JFB covers subjects from chemistry, pharmacy, biology, physics over to engineering. The journal focuses on the preparation, performance and use of functional biomaterials in biomedical devices and their behaviour in physiological environments. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Several topical special issues will be published. Scope: adhesion, adsorption, biocompatibility, biohybrid materials, bio-inert materials, biomaterials, biomedical devices, biomimetic materials, bone repair, cardiovascular devices, ceramics, composite materials, dental implants, dental materials, drug delivery systems, functional biopolymers, glasses, hyper branched polymers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), nanomedicine, nanoparticles, nanotechnology, natural materials, self-assembly smart materials, stimuli responsive materials, surface modification, tissue devices, tissue engineering, tissue-derived materials, urological devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信