Chesapeake Bay Watershed residents' support for varied scenarios for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes.

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Edem Avemegah, Jessica D Ulrich-Schad
{"title":"Chesapeake Bay Watershed residents' support for varied scenarios for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes.","authors":"Edem Avemegah, Jessica D Ulrich-Schad","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To help envision the desired futures for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes over the next 25 years, we assess the support of agricultural and nonagricultural residents for scenarios that propose alternative approaches to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability for agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW). The scenarios include (1) business as usual-or maintaining current trends, (2) providing incentives (e.g., public funds) that help agricultural producers engage in best management practices, (3) preserving farmland, (4) increasing farm profitability through enhanced local food efforts and strengthening rural and urban relationships, and (5) encouraging a societal shift from consumption of meat to vegetable-based proteins. We draw upon data from an online panel of 955 residents and a mail/online survey of 365 producers across the southern part of the CBW (Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our results indicate that nonagricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 3 and 4, while agricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 2 and 3. The least supported scenarios from both groups were Scenarios 1 and 5. Residents' level of education, income, other sources of income, political identity, family farm ownership, age, and gender are related to support of the top scenarios. This information can help stakeholders and policymakers understand the broader landscape of perceptions and help with state or regional planning efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To help envision the desired futures for agricultural systems in urbanized landscapes over the next 25 years, we assess the support of agricultural and nonagricultural residents for scenarios that propose alternative approaches to achieve long-term economic and environmental sustainability for agriculture in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed (CBW). The scenarios include (1) business as usual-or maintaining current trends, (2) providing incentives (e.g., public funds) that help agricultural producers engage in best management practices, (3) preserving farmland, (4) increasing farm profitability through enhanced local food efforts and strengthening rural and urban relationships, and (5) encouraging a societal shift from consumption of meat to vegetable-based proteins. We draw upon data from an online panel of 955 residents and a mail/online survey of 365 producers across the southern part of the CBW (Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia) in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our results indicate that nonagricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 3 and 4, while agricultural residents mostly supported Scenarios 2 and 3. The least supported scenarios from both groups were Scenarios 1 and 5. Residents' level of education, income, other sources of income, political identity, family farm ownership, age, and gender are related to support of the top scenarios. This information can help stakeholders and policymakers understand the broader landscape of perceptions and help with state or regional planning efforts.

切萨皮克湾流域居民对城市化景观中农业系统不同情景的支持。
为了帮助设想未来25年城市化景观中农业系统的理想未来,我们评估了农业和非农业居民对情景的支持,提出了实现切萨皮克湾流域农业长期经济和环境可持续性的替代方法。这些情景包括(1)照常经营或保持当前趋势;(2)提供激励措施(如公共资金),帮助农业生产者从事最佳管理实践;(3)保护农田;(4)通过加强当地粮食工作和加强城乡关系提高农场盈利能力;(5)鼓励社会从肉类消费转向以蔬菜为基础的蛋白质消费。我们分别利用了2021年和2022年对CBW南部(马里兰州、特拉华州和弗吉尼亚州)955名居民的在线小组和365名生产商的邮件/在线调查的数据。研究结果表明,非农业居民主要支持情景3和情景4,而农业居民主要支持情景2和情景3。两组中支持度最低的方案是方案1和方案5。居民的教育水平、收入、其他收入来源、政治认同、家庭农场所有权、年龄和性别与支持顶级场景有关。这些信息可以帮助利益相关者和政策制定者了解更广泛的看法,并有助于国家或地区的规划工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信