Soil carbon storage or sustainable conservation agriculture practices-Which should be our goal?

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Manbir Rakkar, Leonardo Deiss, Warren A Dick
{"title":"Soil carbon storage or sustainable conservation agriculture practices-Which should be our goal?","authors":"Manbir Rakkar, Leonardo Deiss, Warren A Dick","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practices such as no-tillage, cover crops, or diversification of crop rotation are thought to be capable of addressing climate change challenges while ensuring food security. Public and private sectors at national and international levels are currently incentivizing farmers to adopt these practices to increase soil carbon (C) levels, thus helping to mitigate climate change. However, increasing soil C levels with an expectation of mitigating and adapting to climate change needs further evaluation. Reduced soil disturbance, retention of crop residues, planting cover crops, or diversification of crop rotations with perennials are indeed effective, especially in the long term (>10 years), in improving soil properties that enhance climate change adaptation, but not so much climate change mitigation. However, planting of cover crops, considered to be one example that represents conservation agriculture, is currently practiced on only 4.7% of cropland in the United States. Further, we question whether current programs that pay for C stored in soil are sufficient to incentivize farmers to change their operations due to the high cost to test soil C to validate their efforts. We propose that to promote wider adoption of sustainable conservation agricultural practices, and to make large-scale positive impacts through their use, farmers should be paid to \"do the right thing\" instead of paying them based on soil C accrual. The literature indicates that doing the right thing includes (1) continuous no- or minimum-soil disturbance, (2) permanent biomass soil cover, (3) biodiversity in crop rotations, and (4) applying or practicing these three principles on a continuous year-after-year basis. Paying farmers to \"do the right thing\" versus paying farmers for C credits will lead to much higher adoption rates of sustainable conservation agricultural practices by farmers. This will in turn lead to improved crop production and soil and environmental quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practices such as no-tillage, cover crops, or diversification of crop rotation are thought to be capable of addressing climate change challenges while ensuring food security. Public and private sectors at national and international levels are currently incentivizing farmers to adopt these practices to increase soil carbon (C) levels, thus helping to mitigate climate change. However, increasing soil C levels with an expectation of mitigating and adapting to climate change needs further evaluation. Reduced soil disturbance, retention of crop residues, planting cover crops, or diversification of crop rotations with perennials are indeed effective, especially in the long term (>10 years), in improving soil properties that enhance climate change adaptation, but not so much climate change mitigation. However, planting of cover crops, considered to be one example that represents conservation agriculture, is currently practiced on only 4.7% of cropland in the United States. Further, we question whether current programs that pay for C stored in soil are sufficient to incentivize farmers to change their operations due to the high cost to test soil C to validate their efforts. We propose that to promote wider adoption of sustainable conservation agricultural practices, and to make large-scale positive impacts through their use, farmers should be paid to "do the right thing" instead of paying them based on soil C accrual. The literature indicates that doing the right thing includes (1) continuous no- or minimum-soil disturbance, (2) permanent biomass soil cover, (3) biodiversity in crop rotations, and (4) applying or practicing these three principles on a continuous year-after-year basis. Paying farmers to "do the right thing" versus paying farmers for C credits will lead to much higher adoption rates of sustainable conservation agricultural practices by farmers. This will in turn lead to improved crop production and soil and environmental quality.

土壤碳储存或可持续保护农业实践——哪个应该是我们的目标?
人们认为,免耕、覆盖作物或作物轮作多样化等做法能够在确保粮食安全的同时应对气候变化挑战。国家和国际层面的公共和私营部门目前正在鼓励农民采用这些做法来增加土壤碳(C)水平,从而有助于减缓气候变化。然而,增加土壤C水平以缓解和适应气候变化的预期需要进一步评估。减少土壤扰动、保留作物残余物、种植覆盖作物或采用多年生作物轮作的多样化,在改善土壤性质方面确实是有效的,特别是在长期(100年至10年)方面,这些土壤性质可增强对气候变化的适应,但在减缓气候变化方面效果不大。然而,覆盖作物的种植,被认为是保护农业的一个例子,目前在美国只有4.7%的农田被实践。此外,由于测试土壤C以验证其努力的高成本,我们质疑目前为土壤中储存的C付费的计划是否足以激励农民改变他们的操作。我们建议,为了促进更广泛地采用可持续保护性农业做法,并通过它们的使用产生大规模的积极影响,农民应该“做正确的事情”而不是根据土壤C的累积来支付报酬。文献表明,做正确的事情包括(1)持续的不干扰或最小土壤干扰,(2)永久的生物质土壤覆盖,(3)作物轮作的生物多样性,以及(4)年复一年地连续应用或实践这三个原则。向农民“做正确的事情”付费,而不是向农民支付C信用,将使农民对可持续保护农业实践的采用率更高。这将反过来提高作物产量,改善土壤和环境质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信