Grant M Henning, Bridget L Findlay, Tal Cohen, Matthew T McLeay, Spyridon P Basourakos, Aaron M Potretzke, Kevin Koo, Stephen A Boorjian, Matthew K Tollefson, Brian J Linder, Abhinav Khanna, Boyd R Viers
{"title":"A Step Toward Modernization of Urologic Training: Incorporation of a Novel Surgical Intelligence Platform for Robotic Prostatectomy Video Review.","authors":"Grant M Henning, Bridget L Findlay, Tal Cohen, Matthew T McLeay, Spyridon P Basourakos, Aaron M Potretzke, Kevin Koo, Stephen A Boorjian, Matthew K Tollefson, Brian J Linder, Abhinav Khanna, Boyd R Viers","doi":"10.1177/08927790251371728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Surgical video review can be used in urologic training, yet significant barriers to the implementation of video review programs exist, and formal assessment of usage and utility for trainees is limited. Here, we evaluate a novel video review platform to describe patterns of use and determine perceived utility. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We analyzed learning points entered by trainees during video review of radical prostatectomy cases using our surgical intelligence-enabled Film Room platform between September 2023 and July 2024. Learning point content was categorized according to surgical coaching domains as technical, cognitive, nontechnical, or descriptive. Entries were compared by surgical step and level of training. Anonymous surveys were distributed to trainees to determine perceived utility and reveal patterns of video review. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirteen trainees entered 480 unique learning points across all radical prostatectomy steps and spanning surgical coaching domains during the study period. Learning points varied by training level, with junior trainees entering points more often than senior trainees for Retzius-space dissection (<i>N</i> = 73 <i>vs</i> 17, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and seminal vesicle and posterior dissection (<i>N</i> = 58 <i>vs</i> 27, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Trainees used video review in preparation for both upcoming cases and performance analysis. Ninety-four percent of survey respondents reported they either agreed or strongly agreed that video review helped them develop surgical skills. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> We found usage across training levels and high perceived utility of our Film Room platform for video review of robotic prostatectomy. Implementation of video review platforms holds promise to augment existing urologic training and should be explored further.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251371728","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Surgical video review can be used in urologic training, yet significant barriers to the implementation of video review programs exist, and formal assessment of usage and utility for trainees is limited. Here, we evaluate a novel video review platform to describe patterns of use and determine perceived utility. Materials and Methods: We analyzed learning points entered by trainees during video review of radical prostatectomy cases using our surgical intelligence-enabled Film Room platform between September 2023 and July 2024. Learning point content was categorized according to surgical coaching domains as technical, cognitive, nontechnical, or descriptive. Entries were compared by surgical step and level of training. Anonymous surveys were distributed to trainees to determine perceived utility and reveal patterns of video review. Results: Thirteen trainees entered 480 unique learning points across all radical prostatectomy steps and spanning surgical coaching domains during the study period. Learning points varied by training level, with junior trainees entering points more often than senior trainees for Retzius-space dissection (N = 73 vs 17, p < 0.01) and seminal vesicle and posterior dissection (N = 58 vs 27, p < 0.01). Trainees used video review in preparation for both upcoming cases and performance analysis. Ninety-four percent of survey respondents reported they either agreed or strongly agreed that video review helped them develop surgical skills. Conclusions: We found usage across training levels and high perceived utility of our Film Room platform for video review of robotic prostatectomy. Implementation of video review platforms holds promise to augment existing urologic training and should be explored further.
目的:外科视频回顾可用于泌尿外科培训,但实施视频回顾计划存在重大障碍,对受训者的使用和效用的正式评估有限。在这里,我们评估了一个新的视频评论平台来描述使用模式并确定感知效用。材料和方法:我们分析了学员在2023年9月至2024年7月期间使用我们的外科智能Film Room平台进行根治性前列腺切除术病例视频复习时输入的学习点。学习点内容根据外科指导领域分类为技术性、认知性、非技术性或描述性。按手术步骤和训练水平对入组患者进行比较。匿名调查被分发给学员,以确定感知效用和揭示视频审查模式。结果:在研究期间,13名受训者进入了480个独特的学习点,跨越了根治性前列腺切除术的所有步骤和手术指导领域。学习点数因培训水平不同而不同,初级学员比高级学员更容易进入Retzius-space夹层(N = 73 vs 17, p < 0.01)和精囊及后路夹层(N = 58 vs 27, p < 0.01)。学员使用视频复习为即将到来的案例和绩效分析做准备。94%的受访者表示,他们同意或强烈同意视频回顾有助于他们提高手术技能。结论:我们发现在机器人前列腺切除术的视频回顾中,Film Room平台在不同培训水平的使用和高度感知的实用性。视频复习平台的实施有望增加现有的泌尿学培训,并应进一步探索。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.