"Meet us where we're at:" Towards engaging and inclusive research with young adults with a lived experience of cancer.

IF 2 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-07-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.10101
Nicole Collaço, Céline Bolliger, Kirsten Efremov, Peter Dawes, Sonia Obiokafor, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Samantha Sodergren
{"title":"\"Meet us where we're at:\" Towards engaging and inclusive research with young adults with a lived experience of cancer.","authors":"Nicole Collaço, Céline Bolliger, Kirsten Efremov, Peter Dawes, Sonia Obiokafor, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Samantha Sodergren","doi":"10.1017/cts.2025.10101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Meaningful engagement with young adults (YAs) with a lived experience of cancer is important for conducting impactful research on issues that matter to them, and ensures their voices are central to shaping cancer research outcomes. This preliminary study explored barriers and facilitators to participation in research to identify strategies for making cancer research more inclusive and responsive to the needs of YAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study involved twelve YAs (aged 21-43 years at time of interview) with a lived experience of cancer, who participated in a focus group or interview. Participants were recruited via multiple cancer charities/organizations and social media platforms. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to research participation were Person Specific (<i>health and wellbeing, logistical and practical challenges, knowledge, understanding and confidence</i>) and Systemic (<i>lack of advocacy, social and cultural influences</i>). A multi-pronged approach to engage YAs in cancer research should include framing research to make it more relatable, using accessible language, and showcasing its potential value and impact. Incentivising participation and offering flexible engagement formats, (e.g., online surveys and videos), to <i>meet individuals where they are,</i> can aid participation. Collaboration with trusted organizations, ensuring diverse representation in recruitment materials, and using social media platforms were recognized as effective ways to reach a broader audience and ensure inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide practical strategies on how to implement these approaches. From a researcher perspective, early consideration of funding allocation (e.g., dedicated person for social media engagement, time of Patient and Public Involvement) is key to support these strategies and enhance engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"e159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Meaningful engagement with young adults (YAs) with a lived experience of cancer is important for conducting impactful research on issues that matter to them, and ensures their voices are central to shaping cancer research outcomes. This preliminary study explored barriers and facilitators to participation in research to identify strategies for making cancer research more inclusive and responsive to the needs of YAs.

Methods: This qualitative study involved twelve YAs (aged 21-43 years at time of interview) with a lived experience of cancer, who participated in a focus group or interview. Participants were recruited via multiple cancer charities/organizations and social media platforms. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Barriers to research participation were Person Specific (health and wellbeing, logistical and practical challenges, knowledge, understanding and confidence) and Systemic (lack of advocacy, social and cultural influences). A multi-pronged approach to engage YAs in cancer research should include framing research to make it more relatable, using accessible language, and showcasing its potential value and impact. Incentivising participation and offering flexible engagement formats, (e.g., online surveys and videos), to meet individuals where they are, can aid participation. Collaboration with trusted organizations, ensuring diverse representation in recruitment materials, and using social media platforms were recognized as effective ways to reach a broader audience and ensure inclusivity.

Conclusions: We provide practical strategies on how to implement these approaches. From a researcher perspective, early consideration of funding allocation (e.g., dedicated person for social media engagement, time of Patient and Public Involvement) is key to support these strategies and enhance engagement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“在我们所处的位置与我们见面:”致力于与有癌症经历的年轻人进行参与和包容的研究。
背景/目的:与有癌症生活经历的年轻人(YAs)进行有意义的接触,对于开展对他们重要的问题的有影响力的研究非常重要,并确保他们的声音在塑造癌症研究成果方面发挥核心作用。这项初步研究探讨了参与研究的障碍和促进因素,以确定使癌症研究更具包容性和响应癌症患者需求的策略。方法:本定性研究涉及12名有癌症生活经历的青年(访谈时年龄21-43岁),他们参加了焦点小组或访谈。参与者是通过多个癌症慈善组织和社交媒体平台招募的。数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果:参与研究的障碍是个人特有的(健康和福祉、后勤和实践挑战、知识、理解和信心)和系统性的(缺乏宣传、社会和文化影响)。一种多管齐下的方法,让青年学者参与到癌症研究中来,应该包括构建研究框架,使其更具相关性,使用通俗易懂的语言,并展示其潜在的价值和影响。鼓励参与并提供灵活的参与形式(例如,在线调查和视频),以满足个人的需求,有助于参与。与值得信赖的组织合作,确保招聘材料的多样性,以及使用社交媒体平台被认为是接触更广泛受众和确保包容性的有效途径。结论:我们提供了如何实施这些方法的实用策略。从研究人员的角度来看,尽早考虑资金分配(例如,专门负责社交媒体参与的人员,患者和公众参与的时间)是支持这些战略和增强参与的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信