Allison P Gregg, Joseph Kim, Jack Kaufman, Jeremy Maciarz, Vincent Koppelmans, Scott A Langenecker, Regan Patrick, Sara L Weisenbach
{"title":"Another dualism: cognitive versus personality predictors of rumination in later life depression.","authors":"Allison P Gregg, Joseph Kim, Jack Kaufman, Jeremy Maciarz, Vincent Koppelmans, Scott A Langenecker, Regan Patrick, Sara L Weisenbach","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2549999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rumination, a predisposing and perpetuating feature of depression, has been linked to personality and cognition. However, little is known about their comparative influence on rumination. This study examined personality and cognitive variables as predictors of rumination in early-onset, later life depression (LLD) relative to healthy controls (HC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 98 adults aged 55-79 divided into an HC group and LLD group (including active and remitted depression). Secondary analysis considered the subset of LLD with a current depressive episode to investigate effects in state-level depression. Personality predictors included the five domains assessed by the NEO-PI-R. Cognitive domains were executive functioning, attention, and global cognitive ability. Hierarchical linear regressions included predictors of rumination, with variable blocks composed of 1) demographic characteristics, 2) group (LLD vs HC), 3) cognitive/personality variables, and 4) interaction terms for variables with significant main effects. Secondary state depression analysis considered MADRS score in the second block and select predictors in the third block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group (LLD vs HC) significantly predicted rumination in the primary analysis and remained significant following inclusion of all cognitive and personality variables. Neuroticism, and less significantly perseveration on the WCST, also predicted rumination; while there was some indication that cognitive variables were associated with increased rumination in LLD, results overall did not reach significance. MADRS score significantly predicted rumination in the secondary analysis, though predictor variables did not moderate this association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that personality, namely neuroticism, is more predictive of rumination than cognition in older adults. Depression history, neuroticism, and to a lesser extent cognitive flexibility were associated with higher levels of rumination in LLD, while only depression symptom severity was predictive of rumination in state depression. Findings suggest personality is more related to rumination than cognition in LLD, though the relationship may be distinct for state and trait depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2549999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Rumination, a predisposing and perpetuating feature of depression, has been linked to personality and cognition. However, little is known about their comparative influence on rumination. This study examined personality and cognitive variables as predictors of rumination in early-onset, later life depression (LLD) relative to healthy controls (HC).
Methods: Participants were 98 adults aged 55-79 divided into an HC group and LLD group (including active and remitted depression). Secondary analysis considered the subset of LLD with a current depressive episode to investigate effects in state-level depression. Personality predictors included the five domains assessed by the NEO-PI-R. Cognitive domains were executive functioning, attention, and global cognitive ability. Hierarchical linear regressions included predictors of rumination, with variable blocks composed of 1) demographic characteristics, 2) group (LLD vs HC), 3) cognitive/personality variables, and 4) interaction terms for variables with significant main effects. Secondary state depression analysis considered MADRS score in the second block and select predictors in the third block.
Results: Group (LLD vs HC) significantly predicted rumination in the primary analysis and remained significant following inclusion of all cognitive and personality variables. Neuroticism, and less significantly perseveration on the WCST, also predicted rumination; while there was some indication that cognitive variables were associated with increased rumination in LLD, results overall did not reach significance. MADRS score significantly predicted rumination in the secondary analysis, though predictor variables did not moderate this association.
Conclusion: Results demonstrate that personality, namely neuroticism, is more predictive of rumination than cognition in older adults. Depression history, neuroticism, and to a lesser extent cognitive flexibility were associated with higher levels of rumination in LLD, while only depression symptom severity was predictive of rumination in state depression. Findings suggest personality is more related to rumination than cognition in LLD, though the relationship may be distinct for state and trait depression.
反刍是抑郁症的一种易感和持久特征,与人格和认知有关。然而,人们对它们对反刍的相对影响知之甚少。本研究考察了人格和认知变量作为早发性、晚期生活抑郁症(LLD)相对于健康对照组(HC)反刍的预测因素。方法:98名55-79岁的成年人分为HC组和LLD组(包括活跃抑郁和缓解抑郁)。二级分析考虑了当前抑郁发作的LLD子集,以调查国家级别抑郁的影响。人格预测因子包括NEO-PI-R评估的五个领域。认知领域包括执行功能、注意力和整体认知能力。层次线性回归包括反刍的预测因子,变量块由1)人口统计学特征,2)群体(LLD vs HC), 3)认知/人格变量和4)主效应显著变量的交互项组成。第二状态抑郁分析考虑MADRS评分在第二区块和选择预测因子在第三区块。结果:组(LLD vs HC)在初步分析中显著预测反刍,在纳入所有认知和人格变量后仍然显著。神经质和在WCST上的不太显著的坚持也能预测反刍;虽然有一些迹象表明,认知变量与LLD中反刍行为的增加有关,但总体结果并不显著。MADRS评分在二次分析中显著预测反刍,尽管预测变量没有调节这种关联。结论:研究结果表明,人格(即神经质)比认知更能预测老年人的反刍行为。抑郁史、神经质和较小程度的认知灵活性与LLD中较高水平的反刍有关,而只有抑郁症状严重程度可预测抑郁状态下的反刍。研究结果表明,在LLD中,人格与反刍的关系比认知的关系更大,尽管这种关系在状态性和特质性抑郁中可能是不同的。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.