Experiences of people with elevated lipoprotein(a) and the impact on family and child screening.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gabrielle Eversole, Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt, Colin Halverson, Julie M Clary, Benjamin M Helm
{"title":"Experiences of people with elevated lipoprotein(a) and the impact on family and child screening.","authors":"Gabrielle Eversole, Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt, Colin Halverson, Julie M Clary, Benjamin M Helm","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a common heritable causal cardiovascular risk factor, and understanding how patients use Lp(a) status for family screening is imperative. No studies to date have focused on the patient's perspective of their experiences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the experiences of people with elevated Lp(a), we investigated the factors that influence decision regret, optimism, anxiety, and family screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with self-reported elevated Lp(a) completed an online survey assessing their experiences living with elevated Lp(a), including demographics, clinical and family history, barriers to testing, and, among the parent sub-cohort, the decision to test children's Lp(a).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1001 participants with completed surveys, most had no decision regret (70.7%) and minimal anxiety (71.7%) related to their elevated Lp(a). Almost half of participants (47.4%) experienced barriers to Lp(a) testing. Almost all participants (92.9%) reported they shared their Lp(a) results with their family. In a subgroup analysis of parents of children <18 years (n = 399), we investigated influences on the decision to test their children's Lp(a). Significant influences included age, optimism with current clinical care, and an interaction between decision regret and being clinically diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Higher decision regret was associated with a lower probability of testing their children's Lp(a) for participants without a clinical diagnosis of FH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report novel experiences of people with elevated Lp(a), including levels of Lp(a)-specific anxiety, optimism, and decision regret regarding testing. Our results provide impetus for future research aimed at improving Lp(a) testing access, clinician education, and providing support to patients and families.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a common heritable causal cardiovascular risk factor, and understanding how patients use Lp(a) status for family screening is imperative. No studies to date have focused on the patient's perspective of their experiences.

Objective: To understand the experiences of people with elevated Lp(a), we investigated the factors that influence decision regret, optimism, anxiety, and family screening.

Methods: Participants with self-reported elevated Lp(a) completed an online survey assessing their experiences living with elevated Lp(a), including demographics, clinical and family history, barriers to testing, and, among the parent sub-cohort, the decision to test children's Lp(a).

Results: Among 1001 participants with completed surveys, most had no decision regret (70.7%) and minimal anxiety (71.7%) related to their elevated Lp(a). Almost half of participants (47.4%) experienced barriers to Lp(a) testing. Almost all participants (92.9%) reported they shared their Lp(a) results with their family. In a subgroup analysis of parents of children <18 years (n = 399), we investigated influences on the decision to test their children's Lp(a). Significant influences included age, optimism with current clinical care, and an interaction between decision regret and being clinically diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Higher decision regret was associated with a lower probability of testing their children's Lp(a) for participants without a clinical diagnosis of FH.

Conclusion: We report novel experiences of people with elevated Lp(a), including levels of Lp(a)-specific anxiety, optimism, and decision regret regarding testing. Our results provide impetus for future research aimed at improving Lp(a) testing access, clinician education, and providing support to patients and families.

脂蛋白(a)升高人群的经验及其对家庭和儿童筛查的影响。
背景:脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]是一种常见的遗传性心血管危险因素,了解患者如何使用Lp(a)状态进行家庭筛查是必要的。到目前为止,还没有研究关注患者对自己经历的看法。目的:了解Lp(a)升高人群的经历,探讨影响决策后悔、乐观、焦虑和家庭筛查的因素。方法:自我报告Lp(a)升高的参与者完成了一项在线调查,评估他们Lp(a)升高的生活经历,包括人口统计学、临床和家族史、检测障碍,以及在父母亚队列中,检测儿童Lp(a)的决定。结果:在1001名完成调查的参与者中,大多数人没有与Lp(a)升高相关的决策后悔(70.7%)和最小焦虑(71.7%)。几乎一半的参与者(47.4%)经历了Lp(a)测试的障碍。几乎所有的参与者(92.9%)都报告说他们与家人分享了他们的Lp(a)结果。结论:我们报告了Lp(a)升高患者的新经历,包括Lp(a)特异性焦虑、乐观和对测试的决定后悔水平。我们的结果为未来的研究提供了动力,旨在改善Lp(a)检测的获取,临床医生的教育,并为患者和家属提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
209
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner. Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信