Institutional comparison of methods of intraoperative cataract surgery complication reporting.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Allie Simpson, Marshall Henrie, ChaoRong Wu, Benjamin Brintz, Stephen Christiansen, Michael S Jensen, Brian Stagg, Judith Warner
{"title":"Institutional comparison of methods of intraoperative cataract surgery complication reporting.","authors":"Allie Simpson, Marshall Henrie, ChaoRong Wu, Benjamin Brintz, Stephen Christiansen, Michael S Jensen, Brian Stagg, Judith Warner","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of surgeon self-reporting and anterior vitrector equipment billing in identifying intraoperative posterior capsular tears (PCT) with vitreous loss during cataract surgery. A total of 19,258 cataract surgeries performed over six years at the John A. Moran Eye Center were analyzed, with 343 potential complications identified through billing or self-reporting, and 193 confirmed PCT cases based on chart review. Billing data captured 83.9% of PCTs but lacked specificity, including many non-PCT uses of anterior vitrectomy. Surgeon self-reporting was highly specific, with 100% accuracy according to operative reports, but detected only 58.5% of total PCT cases. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of both methods-billing is sensitive but overinclusive, while self-reporting is accurate but underutilized. Neither method alone was sufficient to identify all complications, emphasizing the need for a standardized, comprehensive approach to intraoperative complication monitoring to enhance patient safety and quality assurance in ophthalmic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of surgeon self-reporting and anterior vitrector equipment billing in identifying intraoperative posterior capsular tears (PCT) with vitreous loss during cataract surgery. A total of 19,258 cataract surgeries performed over six years at the John A. Moran Eye Center were analyzed, with 343 potential complications identified through billing or self-reporting, and 193 confirmed PCT cases based on chart review. Billing data captured 83.9% of PCTs but lacked specificity, including many non-PCT uses of anterior vitrectomy. Surgeon self-reporting was highly specific, with 100% accuracy according to operative reports, but detected only 58.5% of total PCT cases. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of both methods-billing is sensitive but overinclusive, while self-reporting is accurate but underutilized. Neither method alone was sufficient to identify all complications, emphasizing the need for a standardized, comprehensive approach to intraoperative complication monitoring to enhance patient safety and quality assurance in ophthalmic surgery.

术中白内障手术并发症报告方法的机构比较。
本研究评估了外科医生自我报告和前玻璃体设备清单在识别白内障手术中玻璃体丢失的术中后囊膜撕裂(PCT)的有效性。研究人员分析了John A. Moran眼科中心六年来进行的19258例白内障手术,其中343例通过账单或自我报告发现了潜在并发症,193例根据图表审查确认了PCT病例。计费数据捕获了83.9%的pct,但缺乏特异性,包括许多非pct前路玻璃体切除术。外科医生自我报告具有高度特异性,根据手术报告准确率为100%,但仅检出58.5%的PCT病例。研究结果突出了这两种方法的优点和局限性——账单敏感但过于包容,而自我报告准确但未得到充分利用。单独使用这两种方法都不足以识别所有并发症,强调需要一种标准化、全面的方法来监测术中并发症,以提高眼科手术患者的安全性和质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信