Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.

IF 0.7 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244
Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev
{"title":"Intraoperative transit time flowmetry during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Early outcome of two different anastomosis technique.","authors":"Abdusalom Abdurakhmanov, Shahboz Buranov, Farkhod Mamataliev, Saidjalol Tursunov, Mustapha Obeid, Ulugbek Ganiev","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"128-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.025.33244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative transit time flowmetry (TTF) is an essential technique for evaluating graft function during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). This study compares graft quality and outcomes using TTF in two surgical approaches: sequential and Y-type saphenous vein grafting.

Methods: A total of 120 patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease were enrolled and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received sequential grafts; Group 2 (n=60) received Y-grafts. Mean graft flow (MGF) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured intraoperatively. Graft function was classified based on flow>15 ml/min and PI<2.5. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography at 48 months to assess graft patency.

Results: Intraoperative TTF showed no significant difference in MGF or PI between graft types, although sequential grafts demonstrated slightly higher flow and lower resistance. Intraoperative graft failure occurred in 1.7% (sequential) vs. 3.3% (Y-grafts). At 48-month follow-up, sequential grafts showed 100% patency, while Y-grafts had a 7.0% occlusion rate. Multivariate analysis identified vessel diameter and conduit type as significant predictors of graft performance; graft configuration (sequential vs. Y) was not independently predictive.

Conclusion: TTF is a valuable intraoperative tool for ensuring graft functionality in OPCABG. While both techniques are viable, sequential grafting demonstrated superior mid-term patency and lower failure rates. These findings support the preferential use of sequential grafting when anatomically feasible and highlight the importance of routine TTF to optimize surgical outcomes.

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中传输时间血流测定:两种不同吻合技术的早期结果。
术中过渡时间血流法(TTF)是非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)中评估移植物功能的重要技术。本研究比较了两种手术入路:序贯式和y型隐静脉移植术中TTF的移植物质量和结果。方法:将120例三支冠状动脉病变患者随机分为两组:第一组(n=60)接受序贯移植;第二组(n=60)接受y型移植物。术中测量平均移植物流量(MGF)和脉搏指数(PI)。根据血流>15 ml/min和PI对移植物功能进行分类结果:术中TTF显示移植物类型间MGF或PI无显著差异,尽管顺序移植物表现出稍高的血流和较低的阻力。术中移植物失败的发生率为1.7%(顺序),而y型移植物失败的发生率为3.3%。随访48个月,序贯移植物通畅率为100%,而y型移植物闭塞率为7.0%。多变量分析发现血管直径和导管类型是移植物性能的重要预测因素;嫁接结构(顺序vs. Y)不能独立预测。结论:TTF是OPCABG术中保证移植物功能的一种有价值的工具。虽然这两种技术都是可行的,但序贯移植术表现出较好的中期通畅性和较低的失败率。这些发现支持在解剖可行的情况下优先使用顺序移植,并强调常规TTF对优化手术结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信