Brief communication: Strong concordance of the North American Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome Score with a positive genetic diagnosis in patients from the Balance study.
Alan S Brown, Philippe Moulin, Andrew Dibble, Veronica J Alexander, Lu Li, Daniel Gaudet, Joseph L Witztum, Sotirios Tsimikas, Robert A Hegele
{"title":"Brief communication: Strong concordance of the North American Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome Score with a positive genetic diagnosis in patients from the Balance study.","authors":"Alan S Brown, Philippe Moulin, Andrew Dibble, Veronica J Alexander, Lu Li, Daniel Gaudet, Joseph L Witztum, Sotirios Tsimikas, Robert A Hegele","doi":"10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) are often misdiagnosed. A positive genetic diagnosis is considered definitive, but clinical scoring systems can also identify affected patients. The North American FCS (NAFCS) Score is intended to identify patients likely to have positive DNA testing, but its sensitivity has not been quantified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate NAFCS Scores in patients from the Balance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated NAFCS Scores in 66 patients with genetically confirmed FCS from the Balance study of olezarsen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66) of patients had NAFCS Scores ≥45 (\"likely FCS\") and ≥60 (\"definite FCS\"), respectively. In contrast, no patient had a score <30 (\"unlikely FCS\"), while 4.5% (3/66) had scores between 30 and 44 (\"uncertain FCS\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong concordance between NAFCS Score ≥45 and a positive genetic diagnosis of FCS suggests that either approach can be used for diagnosis except in \"uncertain FCS\" cases, which require genetic testing. The score might also clinically support an FCS diagnosis when genetic testing is indeterminate due to variants of unknown significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical lipidology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2025.07.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) are often misdiagnosed. A positive genetic diagnosis is considered definitive, but clinical scoring systems can also identify affected patients. The North American FCS (NAFCS) Score is intended to identify patients likely to have positive DNA testing, but its sensitivity has not been quantified.
Objective: To evaluate NAFCS Scores in patients from the Balance study.
Methods: We calculated NAFCS Scores in 66 patients with genetically confirmed FCS from the Balance study of olezarsen.
Results: We found that 95.5% (63/66) and 74.2% (49/66) of patients had NAFCS Scores ≥45 ("likely FCS") and ≥60 ("definite FCS"), respectively. In contrast, no patient had a score <30 ("unlikely FCS"), while 4.5% (3/66) had scores between 30 and 44 ("uncertain FCS").
Conclusion: The strong concordance between NAFCS Score ≥45 and a positive genetic diagnosis of FCS suggests that either approach can be used for diagnosis except in "uncertain FCS" cases, which require genetic testing. The score might also clinically support an FCS diagnosis when genetic testing is indeterminate due to variants of unknown significance.
期刊介绍:
Because the scope of clinical lipidology is broad, the topics addressed by the Journal are equally diverse. Typical articles explore lipidology as it is practiced in the treatment setting, recent developments in pharmacological research, reports of treatment and trials, case studies, the impact of lifestyle modification, and similar academic material of interest to the practitioner.
Sections of Journal of clinical lipidology will address pioneering studies and the clinicians who conduct them, case studies, ethical standards and conduct, professional guidance such as ATP and NCEP, editorial commentary, letters from readers, National Lipid Association (NLA) news and upcoming event information, as well as abstracts from the NLA annual scientific sessions and the scientific forums held by its chapters, when appropriate.