Sex differences in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone density across the adult lifespan: insights into musculoskeletal aging and strength preservation.
William J Kraemer, Noor F Chaudhry, Jillian H Graham, Matthew J Stauder, James A Onate, Maren S Fragala, Jeff S Volek, Scott M Hayes
{"title":"Sex differences in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone density across the adult lifespan: insights into musculoskeletal aging and strength preservation.","authors":"William J Kraemer, Noor F Chaudhry, Jillian H Graham, Matthew J Stauder, James A Onate, Maren S Fragala, Jeff S Volek, Scott M Hayes","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aging is associated with declines in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone mineral density (BMD), yet sex-specific patterns of musculoskeletal aging remain unclear. This study examined the relationships between upper-body strength, lean mass, and arm BMD across the adult lifespan in male and female participants. Upper-body strength [free-weight bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM)], arm BMD [g/cm<sup>2</sup> via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)], and lean body mass (kg via DXA) were assessed in 174 adults (105 females, 69 males; mean age = 53.5 ± 17.4 yr). Hierarchical linear regression models examined associations between strength, BMD, and lean mass. Age was associated with lower bench press 1RM (β = -0.32, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and arm BMD (β = -0.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was marginally significant with lean mass (β = -0.13, <i>P</i> = 0.08). Male participants exhibited a stronger negative association between age and strength (β = -0.19, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Female participants exhibited a marginally stronger negative association between age and arm BMD (β = 0.22, <i>P</i> = 0.061). Upper-body strength was positively associated with arm BMD (β = 0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the strength of this relationship increased with age (β = 0.11, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and was stronger in female participants (β = -0.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Upper-body lean mass was associated with strength (β = 0.62, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and BMD (β = 0.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), but the strength-mass association weakened with age (β = -0.15, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and was stronger in males (β = 0.39, <i>P</i> < 0.001). These findings highlight the sex-specific differences in musculoskeletal aging, emphasizing the importance of strength preservation, particularly in female participants, for mitigating bone loss and osteoporosis risk.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study reveals that upper-body strength declines more rapidly in males than females with age, whereas trending results suggest that bone mineral density may show a stronger decline in female participants. We found that upper-body strength and lean mass predict arm bone mineral density, and these relationships strengthen with age. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining upper-body strength for skeletal health, particularly in female participants, to mitigate osteoporosis risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1000-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00544.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aging is associated with declines in upper-body strength, lean mass, and bone mineral density (BMD), yet sex-specific patterns of musculoskeletal aging remain unclear. This study examined the relationships between upper-body strength, lean mass, and arm BMD across the adult lifespan in male and female participants. Upper-body strength [free-weight bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM)], arm BMD [g/cm2 via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)], and lean body mass (kg via DXA) were assessed in 174 adults (105 females, 69 males; mean age = 53.5 ± 17.4 yr). Hierarchical linear regression models examined associations between strength, BMD, and lean mass. Age was associated with lower bench press 1RM (β = -0.32, P < 0.001) and arm BMD (β = -0.27, P < 0.001) and was marginally significant with lean mass (β = -0.13, P = 0.08). Male participants exhibited a stronger negative association between age and strength (β = -0.19, P < 0.05). Female participants exhibited a marginally stronger negative association between age and arm BMD (β = 0.22, P = 0.061). Upper-body strength was positively associated with arm BMD (β = 0.34, P < 0.001), and the strength of this relationship increased with age (β = 0.11, P < 0.05) and was stronger in female participants (β = -0.56, P < 0.001). Upper-body lean mass was associated with strength (β = 0.62, P < 0.001) and BMD (β = 0.43, P < 0.001), but the strength-mass association weakened with age (β = -0.15, P < 0.001) and was stronger in males (β = 0.39, P < 0.001). These findings highlight the sex-specific differences in musculoskeletal aging, emphasizing the importance of strength preservation, particularly in female participants, for mitigating bone loss and osteoporosis risk.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study reveals that upper-body strength declines more rapidly in males than females with age, whereas trending results suggest that bone mineral density may show a stronger decline in female participants. We found that upper-body strength and lean mass predict arm bone mineral density, and these relationships strengthen with age. These findings highlight the importance of maintaining upper-body strength for skeletal health, particularly in female participants, to mitigate osteoporosis risk.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.