A systematic review on the impact of delayed local therapy in patients with Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Shook Fe Yap, Natacha Omer, Vivek Bhadri, Jeremy Lewin, Wayne Nicholls, Claire Carkeet, Lisa Orme, Marianne Phillips, Mark Winstanley, Smaro Lazarakis, Jasmine Mar, Angela Hong, Julie Cayrol
{"title":"A systematic review on the impact of delayed local therapy in patients with Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis.","authors":"Shook Fe Yap, Natacha Omer, Vivek Bhadri, Jeremy Lewin, Wayne Nicholls, Claire Carkeet, Lisa Orme, Marianne Phillips, Mark Winstanley, Smaro Lazarakis, Jasmine Mar, Angela Hong, Julie Cayrol","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06286-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local treatment of pelvic Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) is czhallenging due to complex anatomy and potential complications. Local therapy may be deferred to maintain chemotherapy dose-intensity, but the impact of this delay on outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review using the PICO model evaluated whether delayed local therapy affects long-term outcomes in localized pelvic EWS. Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched through June 2024. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers for quantitative and qualitative data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1849 studies screened, eight eligible studies including 2618 patients were identified; none were pelvic-specific. When specified, 1-18% had pelvic primaries. All studies were retrospective with substantial heterogeneity in endpoints. Seven of eight studies indicated delayed local therapy was associated with reduced event-free survival (EFS) and/or overall survival (OS). In the largest study (Lin et al.) of 1319 EWS patients, delayed local therapy > 16 weeks was associated with significantly reduced OS (HR 1.41, CI 1.11-1.80, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights the importance of multidisciplinary coordinated care during initial chemotherapy to optimize local therapy timing, which may impact outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess timing significance, particularly for pelvic EWS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 8","pages":"237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06286-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Local treatment of pelvic Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) is czhallenging due to complex anatomy and potential complications. Local therapy may be deferred to maintain chemotherapy dose-intensity, but the impact of this delay on outcomes remains unclear.

Methods: A systematic review using the PICO model evaluated whether delayed local therapy affects long-term outcomes in localized pelvic EWS. Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched through June 2024. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers for quantitative and qualitative data extraction.

Results: Of 1849 studies screened, eight eligible studies including 2618 patients were identified; none were pelvic-specific. When specified, 1-18% had pelvic primaries. All studies were retrospective with substantial heterogeneity in endpoints. Seven of eight studies indicated delayed local therapy was associated with reduced event-free survival (EFS) and/or overall survival (OS). In the largest study (Lin et al.) of 1319 EWS patients, delayed local therapy > 16 weeks was associated with significantly reduced OS (HR 1.41, CI 1.11-1.80, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the importance of multidisciplinary coordinated care during initial chemotherapy to optimize local therapy timing, which may impact outcomes. Further studies are needed to assess timing significance, particularly for pelvic EWS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨盆尤文氏肉瘤延迟局部治疗影响的系统综述。
背景:由于复杂的解剖结构和潜在的并发症,局部治疗骨盆尤因肉瘤(EWS)具有挑战性。局部治疗可能延迟以维持化疗剂量强度,但这种延迟对结果的影响尚不清楚。方法:采用PICO模型进行系统回顾,评估局部延迟治疗是否会影响局部盆腔EWS的长期预后。Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase和Cochrane Central数据库被检索到2024年6月。研究由两名独立的审稿人筛选定量和定性数据提取。结果:在筛选的1849项研究中,确定了8项符合条件的研究,包括2618例患者;没有一个是骨盆特异性的。当有明确说明时,1-18%有盆腔原发。所有的研究都是回顾性的,在终点上有很大的异质性。8项研究中有7项表明延迟局部治疗与降低无事件生存期(EFS)和/或总生存期(OS)相关。在对1319名EWS患者进行的规模最大的研究(Lin等)中,延迟局部治疗16周与OS显著降低相关(HR 1.41, CI 1.11-1.80, p = 0.005)。结论:本系统综述强调了在初始化疗期间多学科协调护理的重要性,以优化局部治疗时机,这可能会影响结果。需要进一步的研究来评估时间的意义,特别是对于盆腔EWS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信