Intracranial Artery Calcification Relates to Brain Damage and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Jiaxin Liu, Xue Chen, Yuchen Liang, Dehong Liu, Xinyue Cheng, Yang Qu, Hongwei Zhou, Zhen-Ni Guo
{"title":"Intracranial Artery Calcification Relates to Brain Damage and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis.","authors":"Jiaxin Liu, Xue Chen, Yuchen Liang, Dehong Liu, Xinyue Cheng, Yang Qu, Hongwei Zhou, Zhen-Ni Guo","doi":"10.5551/jat.65700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Intracranial artery calcification (IAC) in patients with acute ischemic stroke may cause cerebral hemodynamic injury and aggravate ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, its relationship with brain damage and clinical outcomes has not yet been fully explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke who underwent intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) were enrolled. Intracranial artery calcification (IAC) was assessed using the IAC volume and number of calcified vessels (NCV) on pre-IVT computed tomography. Outcomes included the degree of brain injury at 24 h post-IVT, measured by serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels, final infarct volumes, intracranial hemorrhaging within 24 h of IVT, and a poor prognosis at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale >2). A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between IAC parameters and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 348 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 273 (78.4%) had IAC. Patients were divided into four quartile groups (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) based on the total IAC volume. The fourth quartile (Q4), which included patients with the highest IAC volume, was independently associated with elevated GFAP levels (odds ratio [OR] = 2.449, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.057-5.673; P = 0.037). The second quartile (Q2) was independently associated with final infarct volume (β:0.483, 95% CI:0.014-0.952, P = 0.044). In addition, NCV was independently correlated with increased GFAP levels (OR = 1.265, 95% CI:1.010-1.584, P = 0.040) and a poor prognosis (OR = 1.270, 95% CI: 1.008-1.600, P = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IAC was independently associated with the degree of brain injury, final infarct volume, and prognosis in patients after IVT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Intracranial artery calcification (IAC) in patients with acute ischemic stroke may cause cerebral hemodynamic injury and aggravate ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, its relationship with brain damage and clinical outcomes has not yet been fully explored.

Methods: Patients with acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke who underwent intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) were enrolled. Intracranial artery calcification (IAC) was assessed using the IAC volume and number of calcified vessels (NCV) on pre-IVT computed tomography. Outcomes included the degree of brain injury at 24 h post-IVT, measured by serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels, final infarct volumes, intracranial hemorrhaging within 24 h of IVT, and a poor prognosis at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale >2). A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations between IAC parameters and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 348 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 273 (78.4%) had IAC. Patients were divided into four quartile groups (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) based on the total IAC volume. The fourth quartile (Q4), which included patients with the highest IAC volume, was independently associated with elevated GFAP levels (odds ratio [OR] = 2.449, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.057-5.673; P = 0.037). The second quartile (Q2) was independently associated with final infarct volume (β:0.483, 95% CI:0.014-0.952, P = 0.044). In addition, NCV was independently correlated with increased GFAP levels (OR = 1.265, 95% CI:1.010-1.584, P = 0.040) and a poor prognosis (OR = 1.270, 95% CI: 1.008-1.600, P = 0.043).

Conclusion: IAC was independently associated with the degree of brain injury, final infarct volume, and prognosis in patients after IVT.

颅内动脉钙化与静脉溶栓患者脑损伤及临床预后有关。
目的:急性缺血性脑卒中患者颅内动脉钙化(IAC)可引起脑血流动力学损伤,加重缺血再灌注损伤。然而,其与脑损伤和临床结果的关系尚未得到充分探讨。方法:对急性前循环缺血性脑卒中患者行静脉溶栓治疗。颅内动脉钙化(IAC)通过ivt前计算机断层扫描的IAC体积和钙化血管(NCV)数量进行评估。结果包括IVT后24小时的脑损伤程度,通过血清胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)水平、最终梗死体积、IVT后24小时的颅内出血以及90天的不良预后(改良Rankin量表>2)来测量。采用多变量回归分析来评估IAC参数与临床结果之间的关系。结果:共有348例患者入组,其中273例(78.4%)患有IAC。根据IAC的总容积将患者分为四个四分位数组(Q1、Q2、Q3和Q4)。第四个四分位数(Q4),包括IAC体积最高的患者,与GFAP水平升高独立相关(优势比[OR] = 2.449, 95%可信区间[CI], 1.057-5.673; P = 0.037)。第二个四分位数(Q2)与最终梗死体积独立相关(β:0.483, 95% CI:0.014-0.952, P = 0.044)。此外,NCV与GFAP水平升高(OR = 1.265, 95% CI:1.010-1.584, P = 0.040)和预后不良(OR = 1.270, 95% CI: 1.008-1.600, P = 0.043)独立相关。结论:IAC与IVT患者脑损伤程度、最终梗死面积及预后独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信