Decreased Aortic Elasticity in Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy Compared to Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Martijn Tukker, Sharida Mohamedhoesein, Emrah Kaya, Arend F L Schinkel, Kadir Caliskan
{"title":"Decreased Aortic Elasticity in Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy Compared to Dilated Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Martijn Tukker, Sharida Mohamedhoesein, Emrah Kaya, Arend F L Schinkel, Kadir Caliskan","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12080303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abnormal aortic elasticity serves as a marker for cardiovascular mortality and has a negative impact on the left ventricular (LV) afterload. Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is characterized by hypertrabeculation of the LV endomyocardial wall, with an underdeveloped endocardial helix. This may result in absence of LV twist, disturbed aortic elasticity, LV dysfunction, and ultimately premature heart failure (HF). This study compared the aortic stiffness and clinical outcome in patients with NCCM to that of a control group with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Sixty NCCM patients, matched by age and sex, were compared with 60 DCM controls. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to measure the systolic (SD) and diastolic diameters (DD) of the ascending aorta. These measurements, along with systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), were utilized to calculate the aortic stiffness index defined as ln(SBP/DBP)/[(SD-DD)/DD]. This index was then compared to clinical features and outcome. The mean age was 49 ± 16 years (55% males) in the NCCM group and 49 ± 16 years (55% male) in the DCM group. Aortic stiffness index (ASI) was significantly higher in the NCCM group than in the DCM group (7.0 [5.8-10.2] vs. 6.2 [4.8-7.7], <i>p</i> = 0.011). This difference remained statistically significant after adjustment for established risk factors associated with aortic stiffness (β = 1.771; 95% CI [0.253-3.289], <i>p</i> = 0.023). Patients with NCCM demonstrated increased aortic stiffness when compared to those with DCM, which may reflect the underlying pathophysiological processes. Additional research is necessary to evaluate the impact of aortic stiffness on the advancement of LV dysfunction, the onset of heart failure, and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12386488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12080303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abnormal aortic elasticity serves as a marker for cardiovascular mortality and has a negative impact on the left ventricular (LV) afterload. Noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM) is characterized by hypertrabeculation of the LV endomyocardial wall, with an underdeveloped endocardial helix. This may result in absence of LV twist, disturbed aortic elasticity, LV dysfunction, and ultimately premature heart failure (HF). This study compared the aortic stiffness and clinical outcome in patients with NCCM to that of a control group with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Sixty NCCM patients, matched by age and sex, were compared with 60 DCM controls. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed to measure the systolic (SD) and diastolic diameters (DD) of the ascending aorta. These measurements, along with systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), were utilized to calculate the aortic stiffness index defined as ln(SBP/DBP)/[(SD-DD)/DD]. This index was then compared to clinical features and outcome. The mean age was 49 ± 16 years (55% males) in the NCCM group and 49 ± 16 years (55% male) in the DCM group. Aortic stiffness index (ASI) was significantly higher in the NCCM group than in the DCM group (7.0 [5.8-10.2] vs. 6.2 [4.8-7.7], p = 0.011). This difference remained statistically significant after adjustment for established risk factors associated with aortic stiffness (β = 1.771; 95% CI [0.253-3.289], p = 0.023). Patients with NCCM demonstrated increased aortic stiffness when compared to those with DCM, which may reflect the underlying pathophysiological processes. Additional research is necessary to evaluate the impact of aortic stiffness on the advancement of LV dysfunction, the onset of heart failure, and long-term outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与扩张型心肌病相比,非压实性心肌病主动脉弹性降低。
主动脉弹性异常是心血管死亡的标志,对左心室负荷有负面影响。非压实性心肌病(NCCM)的特征是左室心内膜壁小梁过高,心内膜螺旋不发达。这可能导致左室扭曲缺失,主动脉弹性紊乱,左室功能障碍,最终导致心力衰竭(HF)。本研究比较了NCCM患者与扩张型心肌病(DCM)对照组的主动脉硬度和临床结果。60例年龄和性别匹配的NCCM患者与60例DCM对照组进行比较。经胸超声心动图测量升主动脉收缩直径(SD)和舒张直径(DD)。这些测量与收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)一起用于计算主动脉硬度指数,定义为ln(SBP/DBP)/[(SD-DD)/DD]。然后将该指标与临床特征和结果进行比较。NCCM组患者平均年龄49±16岁(男性55%),DCM组患者平均年龄49±16岁(男性55%)。NCCM组主动脉硬度指数(ASI)显著高于DCM组(7.0 [5.8-10.2]vs. 6.2 [4.8-7.7], p = 0.011)。在校正与主动脉僵硬相关的危险因素后,这一差异仍具有统计学意义(β = 1.771; 95% CI [0.253-3.289], p = 0.023)。与DCM患者相比,NCCM患者的主动脉僵硬度增加,这可能反映了潜在的病理生理过程。需要进一步的研究来评估主动脉僵硬对左室功能障碍进展、心力衰竭发病和长期预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信