Uptake of drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies and impact on costs over 2015-22: experience from an HIV clinic in Paris, France.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
L Sagaon-Teyssier, A Eremin, M A Valantin, A Fauchois, R Tubiana, S Seang, L Schneider, A Fayçal, S Saliba, M Wirden, C Soulié, G Peytavin, V Pourcher, R Agher, R Palich, C Katlama
{"title":"Uptake of drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies and impact on costs over 2015-22: experience from an HIV clinic in Paris, France.","authors":"L Sagaon-Teyssier, A Eremin, M A Valantin, A Fauchois, R Tubiana, S Seang, L Schneider, A Fayçal, S Saliba, M Wirden, C Soulié, G Peytavin, V Pourcher, R Agher, R Palich, C Katlama","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While current HIV care includes drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies, intermittent therapy, recently recommended in France, could benefit from further evaluation in real-life clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the uptake, efficacy and cost impact of drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies (DRS) in a large HIV clinic in Paris.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all virally suppressed adult individuals living with HIV treated at our clinic from 2015 to 2022, on three-drug (3-DR) or two-drug (2-DR) daily regimens, with ≥1 clinical and viral load assessment recorded per year. We defined DRS as either 2-DR or intermittent oral regimen (4 or 5 days weekly). Main outcomes included DRS uptake, factors associated with DRS prescription, virological failure (VF) by ART strategy and costs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We analysed 2170 individuals (median age: 50.6, viral suppression: 6.0 years) on daily 3-DR (77.5%) and 2-DR (22.5%). Over 8 years, 1048 participants (48.3%) switched to a DRS that consisted of intermittent ART (ART-I) in 580 participants and a 2-DR in 442 participants. The VF rate was 11.2% for 3-DR, 5.3% for 2-DR and 1.8% for intermittent ART. Overall, in 2022, 1184 participants (54.6%) were receiving a DRS. Average yearly cost of HIV care per participant dropped from €15 687 in 2015 to €7437 in 2022, with per-participant costs of €7643 for 3-DR, €8869 for 2-DR and €3388 for ART-I.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Drug-reduced ART regimens were prescribed to over half of the study population. Intermittent regimens, widely used in our setting, are highly effective and cost-saving, and deserve to be evaluated for implementation, particularly in resource-constrained contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2825-2833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While current HIV care includes drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies, intermittent therapy, recently recommended in France, could benefit from further evaluation in real-life clinical practice.

Objectives: To evaluate the uptake, efficacy and cost impact of drug-reduced antiretroviral strategies (DRS) in a large HIV clinic in Paris.

Methods: This retrospective study included all virally suppressed adult individuals living with HIV treated at our clinic from 2015 to 2022, on three-drug (3-DR) or two-drug (2-DR) daily regimens, with ≥1 clinical and viral load assessment recorded per year. We defined DRS as either 2-DR or intermittent oral regimen (4 or 5 days weekly). Main outcomes included DRS uptake, factors associated with DRS prescription, virological failure (VF) by ART strategy and costs.

Findings: We analysed 2170 individuals (median age: 50.6, viral suppression: 6.0 years) on daily 3-DR (77.5%) and 2-DR (22.5%). Over 8 years, 1048 participants (48.3%) switched to a DRS that consisted of intermittent ART (ART-I) in 580 participants and a 2-DR in 442 participants. The VF rate was 11.2% for 3-DR, 5.3% for 2-DR and 1.8% for intermittent ART. Overall, in 2022, 1184 participants (54.6%) were receiving a DRS. Average yearly cost of HIV care per participant dropped from €15 687 in 2015 to €7437 in 2022, with per-participant costs of €7643 for 3-DR, €8869 for 2-DR and €3388 for ART-I.

Conclusions: Drug-reduced ART regimens were prescribed to over half of the study population. Intermittent regimens, widely used in our setting, are highly effective and cost-saving, and deserve to be evaluated for implementation, particularly in resource-constrained contexts.

2015-22年期间药物减少抗逆转录病毒战略的采用及其对成本的影响:来自法国巴黎一家艾滋病毒诊所的经验
背景:虽然目前的艾滋病毒护理包括药物减少抗逆转录病毒策略,但最近在法国推荐的间歇性治疗可以从现实临床实践的进一步评估中获益。目的:评估巴黎一家大型艾滋病毒诊所药物减量抗逆转录病毒策略(DRS)的吸收、疗效和成本影响。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2022年在我们诊所接受治疗的所有病毒抑制的成年HIV感染者,每天服用三药(3-DR)或两药(2-DR)方案,每年记录≥1次临床和病毒载量评估。我们将DRS定义为2-DR或间歇口服方案(每周4或5天)。主要结局包括抗菌素摄取、抗菌素处方相关因素、抗逆转录病毒治疗策略的病毒学失败(VF)和成本。研究结果:我们分析了2170例患者(中位年龄:50.6岁,病毒抑制年龄:6.0岁),每天服用3-DR(77.5%)和2-DR(22.5%)。在8年多的时间里,1048名参与者(48.3%)改用DRS,其中580名参与者改用间歇性ART (ART- i), 442名参与者改用2-DR。3-DR的VF率为11.2%,2-DR为5.3%,间歇ART为1.8%。总体而言,在2022年,1184名参与者(54.6%)接受了DRS。每位参与者的HIV护理平均年成本从2015年的15687欧元下降到2022年的7437欧元,其中3-DR的人均成本为7643欧元,2-DR的人均成本为8869欧元,ART-I的人均成本为3388欧元。结论:半数以上的研究人群接受了减量抗逆转录病毒治疗。在我国广泛使用的间歇性治疗方案非常有效且节省成本,值得对其实施情况进行评估,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信