Successful establishment of a model of the piglet gastrointestinal microbiota and its' modulation by prebiotics.

IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Bruno P Milnitsky, Harry L P Junior, Beni J M Chaúque, Gertrudes Corção
{"title":"Successful establishment of a model of the piglet gastrointestinal microbiota and its' modulation by prebiotics.","authors":"Bruno P Milnitsky, Harry L P Junior, Beni J M Chaúque, Gertrudes Corção","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxaf216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study proposed an in-house in vitro model to investigate the effects of two prebiotic treatments on the gastrointestinal microbiota of piglets.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The model involved suspending piglet feces in a culture medium to simulate the ileum and proximal colon regions of the swine gastrointestinal tract. The prebiotics tested were mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) and sodium butyrate. Metabarcoding and culturomics were used to assess the impact of prebiotics on bacterial species composition. Minimum inhibitory concentration tests were conducted to examine bacterial susceptibility patterns. Key bacterial phyla identified included firmicutes, proteobacteria, bacteroidetes, and actinobacteria. Culturomics detected families and several species not identified by metabarcoding. In the simulated proximal colon, MOS increased the abundance of certain species and reduced bacteria with type I fimbriae. Butyric acid promoted beneficial host-associated bacteria and decreased pathogenic species. However, the prebiotics did not significantly affect bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house model successfully mimicked piglet intestinal microbiota, allowing for detailed analysis. Both prebiotics positively influenced the piglets microbiota, providing insights into how these treatments potentially influenced the microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study proposed an in-house in vitro model to investigate the effects of two prebiotic treatments on the gastrointestinal microbiota of piglets.

Methods and results: The model involved suspending piglet feces in a culture medium to simulate the ileum and proximal colon regions of the swine gastrointestinal tract. The prebiotics tested were mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) and sodium butyrate. Metabarcoding and culturomics were used to assess the impact of prebiotics on bacterial species composition. Minimum inhibitory concentration tests were conducted to examine bacterial susceptibility patterns. Key bacterial phyla identified included firmicutes, proteobacteria, bacteroidetes, and actinobacteria. Culturomics detected families and several species not identified by metabarcoding. In the simulated proximal colon, MOS increased the abundance of certain species and reduced bacteria with type I fimbriae. Butyric acid promoted beneficial host-associated bacteria and decreased pathogenic species. However, the prebiotics did not significantly affect bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics.

Conclusion: The in-house model successfully mimicked piglet intestinal microbiota, allowing for detailed analysis. Both prebiotics positively influenced the piglets microbiota, providing insights into how these treatments potentially influenced the microbiota.

成功建立仔猪胃肠道微生物群模型及益生元对其调节作用。
目的:本研究建立了两种益生元处理对仔猪胃肠道微生物群的影响的体外模型。方法和结果:该模型将仔猪粪便悬浮在培养基中,模拟猪胃肠道回肠和结肠近端区域。所测试的益生元为甘露寡糖(MOS)和丁酸钠。使用元条形码和培养组学来评估益生元对细菌种类组成的影响。进行最低抑菌浓度试验以检查细菌的敏感性模式。鉴定出的主要细菌门类包括厚壁菌门、变形菌门、拟杆菌门和放线菌门。培养组学检测到元条形码未识别的科和几种物种。在模拟近端结肠中,MOS增加了某些物种的丰度,减少了I型菌毛的细菌。丁酸促进了有益的宿主相关细菌,减少了致病菌。然而,益生元并没有显著影响细菌对抗生素的敏感性。结论:该模型成功地模拟了仔猪肠道菌群,可以进行详细的分析。这两种益生元都对仔猪的微生物群产生了积极的影响,为这些处理如何潜在地影响微生物群提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Journal of Applied Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.50%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信