Real-time EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with group therapy for adolescents with depression and self-harm behavior: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120144
Hong Liu, Shaowei Liu, Ming Yu, Bo Xin, Yanju Liu
{"title":"Real-time EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with group therapy for adolescents with depression and self-harm behavior: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hong Liu, Shaowei Liu, Ming Yu, Bo Xin, Yanju Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of real-time EEG-triggered repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with group therapy versus rTMS alone over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adolescents with depression and self-harm behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 160 inpatients aged 12-18 years with depression and recent self-harm (≤2 weeks prior) from June to December 2024. Participants were 1:1 randomized to rTMS alone (control, n = 80) or rTMS plus group therapy (observation, n = 80).</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>4-week change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) scores. Secondary outcomes included anxiety (HAMA-14), suicide risk (SPS), self-harm severity, and neurophysiological markers measured by resting-state EEG (α/θ power, θ/β ratio) and event-related potentials (P300 latency/amplitude) from a task-evoked paradigm. Randomization used computer-generated block sequences (size = 4) with sealed-envelope concealment; outcome assessors were blinded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were balanced. Intention-to-treat analysis showed greater HAMD-24 reduction in the observation group (-14.5 ± 3.2 vs. -9.8 ± 2.9, P < 0.001). Observation group also had significant improvements in HAMA-14 (-10.2 ± 2.5 vs. -6.7 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), SPS (-12.3 ± 4.1 vs. -7.9 ± 3.5, P < 0.001), self-harm severity (-8.7 ± 2.8 vs. -4.9 ± 2.3, P < 0.001), and neurophysiological indices (shorter P300 latency, lower θ/β ratio, all P < 0.001). No severe adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-time EEG-triggered rTMS combined with group therapy demonstrates superior efficacy in improving clinical symptoms and neurophysiological markers for adolescents with depression and self-harm, offering a potential optimized intervention strategy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07047534).</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of real-time EEG-triggered repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with group therapy versus rTMS alone over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in adolescents with depression and self-harm behavior.

Methods: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 160 inpatients aged 12-18 years with depression and recent self-harm (≤2 weeks prior) from June to December 2024. Participants were 1:1 randomized to rTMS alone (control, n = 80) or rTMS plus group therapy (observation, n = 80).

Primary outcome: 4-week change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) scores. Secondary outcomes included anxiety (HAMA-14), suicide risk (SPS), self-harm severity, and neurophysiological markers measured by resting-state EEG (α/θ power, θ/β ratio) and event-related potentials (P300 latency/amplitude) from a task-evoked paradigm. Randomization used computer-generated block sequences (size = 4) with sealed-envelope concealment; outcome assessors were blinded.

Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced. Intention-to-treat analysis showed greater HAMD-24 reduction in the observation group (-14.5 ± 3.2 vs. -9.8 ± 2.9, P < 0.001). Observation group also had significant improvements in HAMA-14 (-10.2 ± 2.5 vs. -6.7 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), SPS (-12.3 ± 4.1 vs. -7.9 ± 3.5, P < 0.001), self-harm severity (-8.7 ± 2.8 vs. -4.9 ± 2.3, P < 0.001), and neurophysiological indices (shorter P300 latency, lower θ/β ratio, all P < 0.001). No severe adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: Real-time EEG-triggered rTMS combined with group therapy demonstrates superior efficacy in improving clinical symptoms and neurophysiological markers for adolescents with depression and self-harm, offering a potential optimized intervention strategy.

Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07047534).

实时脑电图触发的经颅磁刺激联合团体治疗青少年抑郁症和自残行为:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价实时脑电图触发的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合团体治疗与单独rTMS治疗左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)治疗青少年抑郁症和自残行为的疗效。方法:采用平行组随机对照试验(RCT),于2024年6月至12月招募160例年龄12-18 岁(≤2 周前)的近期自残抑郁症患者。参与者按1:1随机分为单独rTMS组(对照组,n = 80)或rTMS加组治疗组(观察组,n = 80)。主要结局:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-24)评分4周的变化。次要结果包括焦虑(HAMA-14)、自杀风险(SPS)、自残严重程度,以及静息状态脑电图(α/θ功率、θ/β比)和事件相关电位(P300潜伏期/振幅)测量的神经生理指标。随机化使用计算机生成的块序列(大小 = 4),密封信封隐藏;结果评估者采用盲法。结果:基线特征平衡。意向治疗分析显示,观察组HAMD-24降低幅度更大(-14.5 ± 3.2 vs. -9.8 ± 2.9,P )。结论:实时脑电图触发rTMS联合小组治疗在改善青少年抑郁自残患者临床症状和神经生理指标方面疗效显著,为优化干预策略提供了可能。试验注册:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT07047534)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信