Valuation of cognition bolt-ons for EQ-5D-5L in Japan: A comparative analysis of scaling factor and conventional models.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1177/13872877251365548
Ataru Igarashi, Aureliano Paolo Finch, Zhihao Yang, Yukinori Sakata, Mie Azuma-Kasai, Kiyoyuki Tomita, Mika Ishii, Manabu Ikeda
{"title":"Valuation of cognition bolt-ons for EQ-5D-5L in Japan: A comparative analysis of scaling factor and conventional models.","authors":"Ataru Igarashi, Aureliano Paolo Finch, Zhihao Yang, Yukinori Sakata, Mie Azuma-Kasai, Kiyoyuki Tomita, Mika Ishii, Manabu Ikeda","doi":"10.1177/13872877251365548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundA cognition bolt-on version for EQ-5D is needed to comprehensively assess health states of the general population.ObjectiveTo experimentally evaluate the valuation methods of the EQ-5D-5L bolt-ons using scaling factor and conventional models, we used the cognition bolt-on version of the Japanese EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L + C) and two previously developed cognition dimensions Remembering things and Thinking clearly.MethodsEligible participants, recruited from the general Japanese population, included adults living in three cities. Interviews were conducted from June to August 2023. Participants were randomized to Arms 1 (EQ-5D-5L + C), 2 (EQ-5D-5L + Remembering things), and 3 (EQ-5D-5L + Thinking clearly). Preferences were collected using a composite time trade-off (cTTO). The \"1-cTTO\" data were modeled using the scaling factor model, with EQ-5D-5L disutility weights estimated from the existing value sets. We also fitted the data into the conventional main-effects additive model. Both models used a tobit model and maximum likelihood estimation. Model performance was assessed using indices of fit.ResultsOverall, 864 individuals participated in the study. Addition of cognition dimensions to EQ-5D-5L expanded the scaling factor model coefficients in all arms. The observed mean and predicted \"1-cTTO\" values of the scaling factor model were not largely different in all three arms. The mean absolute errors of the scaling factor and conventional models were 0.0720 and 0.1305, 0.0748 and 0.0885, and 0.0985 and 0.0685 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively.ConclusionsThe performance of the two models did not appear greatly different. Further experimental valuation studies using the scaling factor model and cognition items are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"1209-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251365548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundA cognition bolt-on version for EQ-5D is needed to comprehensively assess health states of the general population.ObjectiveTo experimentally evaluate the valuation methods of the EQ-5D-5L bolt-ons using scaling factor and conventional models, we used the cognition bolt-on version of the Japanese EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L + C) and two previously developed cognition dimensions Remembering things and Thinking clearly.MethodsEligible participants, recruited from the general Japanese population, included adults living in three cities. Interviews were conducted from June to August 2023. Participants were randomized to Arms 1 (EQ-5D-5L + C), 2 (EQ-5D-5L + Remembering things), and 3 (EQ-5D-5L + Thinking clearly). Preferences were collected using a composite time trade-off (cTTO). The "1-cTTO" data were modeled using the scaling factor model, with EQ-5D-5L disutility weights estimated from the existing value sets. We also fitted the data into the conventional main-effects additive model. Both models used a tobit model and maximum likelihood estimation. Model performance was assessed using indices of fit.ResultsOverall, 864 individuals participated in the study. Addition of cognition dimensions to EQ-5D-5L expanded the scaling factor model coefficients in all arms. The observed mean and predicted "1-cTTO" values of the scaling factor model were not largely different in all three arms. The mean absolute errors of the scaling factor and conventional models were 0.0720 and 0.1305, 0.0748 and 0.0885, and 0.0985 and 0.0685 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively.ConclusionsThe performance of the two models did not appear greatly different. Further experimental valuation studies using the scaling factor model and cognition items are warranted.

日本EQ-5D-5L认知锚点评价:比例因子与传统模型的比较分析。
背景:需要一个EQ-5D的认知附加版本来全面评估普通人群的健康状况。目的利用日本EQ-5D-5L认知强化版(EQ-5D-5L + C)和前人开发的两个认知维度“记忆”和“清晰思考”,对EQ-5D-5L认知强化的标度因子和常规模型进行实验评价。方法从日本普通人群中招募符合条件的参与者,包括居住在三个城市的成年人。采访时间为2023年6月至8月。参与者被随机分配到第1组(EQ-5D-5L + C),第2组(EQ-5D-5L +记忆)和第3组(EQ-5D-5L +清晰思考)。使用复合时间权衡(cTTO)收集偏好。使用比例因子模型对“1-cTTO”数据进行建模,并根据现有值集估计EQ-5D-5L负效用权重。我们还将数据拟合到传统的主效应加性模型中。两个模型都使用了tobit模型和最大似然估计。使用拟合指数评估模型性能。结果总共有864人参与了这项研究。在EQ-5D-5L中加入认知维度扩展了各维度的比例因子模型系数。比例因子模型观察到的平均值和预测的“1-cTTO”值在所有三个组中没有很大差异。在第1、2、3组中,比例因子和常规模型的平均绝对误差分别为0.0720和0.1305、0.0748和0.0885、0.0985和0.0685。结论两种模型的性能差异不大。进一步的实验评估研究使用比例因子模型和认知项目是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信