Enhancement of inter-/intra-reader agreement using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound software fusion prostate biopsy.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Won Hoon Song, Tae Un Kim, Hwa Seong Ryu, Mi Sook Yun, Sung-Woo Park
{"title":"Enhancement of inter-/intra-reader agreement using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound software fusion prostate biopsy.","authors":"Won Hoon Song, Tae Un Kim, Hwa Seong Ryu, Mi Sook Yun, Sung-Woo Park","doi":"10.4111/icu.20250208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated inter-/intra-reader agreement with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We enrolled 210 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for clinically suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer. Four readers, including two urologists, viewed patients' mpMRI and scored PI-RADS between two sessions, including the time for feedback and training after the first reading session. Inter- and intra-reader agreements were evaluated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (κ), agreement coefficient 1 (AC1), and percentage of agreement (PA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall inter-reader agreement between all readers was moderate (κ=0.466, AC1=0.522, and PA=0.610). The overall inter-reader agreement improved in the second session. The agreement for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions was higher than that for transitional zone (TZ) lesions. At a PI-RADS cut-off of 4, the agreement for PZ lesions was almost perfect (PA=0.888) and higher than that for TZ lesions. The inter-reader agreement for lesions with a PI-RADS ≥4 and Gleason score ≥7 was almost perfect (AC1=0.960 and PA=0.964). The intra-reader agreement for lesions overall and PI-RADS ≥4 lesions were substantial (AC1=0.601) and almost perfect (PA=0.876), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Readers achieved moderate agreement for PI-RADS version 2.1 and benefitted from training sessions. Feedback, training, and multidisciplinary discussions also improved inter-reader agreement. Our study can provide guidance, updates, and further steps for the standardization and improvement of PI-RADS scoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":14522,"journal":{"name":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","volume":"66 5","pages":"405-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12437575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative and Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated inter-/intra-reader agreement with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.

Materials and methods: We enrolled 210 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for clinically suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer. Four readers, including two urologists, viewed patients' mpMRI and scored PI-RADS between two sessions, including the time for feedback and training after the first reading session. Inter- and intra-reader agreements were evaluated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (κ), agreement coefficient 1 (AC1), and percentage of agreement (PA).

Results: The overall inter-reader agreement between all readers was moderate (κ=0.466, AC1=0.522, and PA=0.610). The overall inter-reader agreement improved in the second session. The agreement for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions was higher than that for transitional zone (TZ) lesions. At a PI-RADS cut-off of 4, the agreement for PZ lesions was almost perfect (PA=0.888) and higher than that for TZ lesions. The inter-reader agreement for lesions with a PI-RADS ≥4 and Gleason score ≥7 was almost perfect (AC1=0.960 and PA=0.964). The intra-reader agreement for lesions overall and PI-RADS ≥4 lesions were substantial (AC1=0.601) and almost perfect (PA=0.876), respectively.

Conclusions: Readers achieved moderate agreement for PI-RADS version 2.1 and benefitted from training sessions. Feedback, training, and multidisciplinary discussions also improved inter-reader agreement. Our study can provide guidance, updates, and further steps for the standardization and improvement of PI-RADS scoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在磁共振成像/经直肠超声软件融合前列腺活检中,使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统2.1版本增强前列腺癌检测的读者间/读者内一致性。
目的:本研究评估前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 2.1版阅读器之间/阅读器内部的一致性,以提高前列腺癌的检出率。材料和方法:我们招募了210名临床怀疑或诊断为前列腺癌的患者接受了多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查。包括两名泌尿科医生在内的四名阅读者查看了患者的mpMRI,并在两次阅读期间对PI-RADS进行评分,包括第一次阅读后的反馈和训练时间。使用Fleiss kappa系数(κ)、一致性系数1 (AC1)和一致性百分比(PA)评估读者间和读者内一致性。结果:所有读者之间的总体一致性为中等(κ=0.466, AC1=0.522, PA=0.610)。在第二届会议上,读者间的总体共识有所改善。外周带(PZ)病变的一致性高于过渡带(TZ)病变。在PI-RADS截止值为4时,PZ病变的一致性几乎是完美的(PA=0.888),高于TZ病变。对于PI-RADS≥4、Gleason评分≥7的病变,读者间一致性几乎完全(AC1=0.960, PA=0.964)。总体病变和PI-RADS≥4病变的解读器内一致性相当(AC1=0.601),几乎完美(PA=0.876)。结论:读者对PI-RADS 2.1版达到了中等程度的一致性,并从培训课程中受益。反馈、培训和多学科讨论也改善了读者间的共识。我们的研究可以为PI-RADS评分的标准化和改进提供指导、更新和进一步的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative and Clinical Urology (Investig Clin Urol, ICUrology) is an international, peer-reviewed, platinum open access journal published bimonthly. ICUrology aims to provide outstanding scientific and clinical research articles, that will advance knowledge and understanding of urological diseases and current therapeutic treatments. ICUrology publishes Original Articles, Rapid Communications, Review Articles, Special Articles, Innovations in Urology, Editorials, and Letters to the Editor, with a focus on the following areas of expertise: • Precision Medicine in Urology • Urological Oncology • Robotics/Laparoscopy • Endourology/Urolithiasis • Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction • Female Urology • Sexual Dysfunction/Infertility • Infection/Inflammation • Reconstruction/Transplantation • Geriatric Urology • Pediatric Urology • Basic/Translational Research One of the notable features of ICUrology is the application of multimedia platforms facilitating easy-to-access online video clips of newly developed surgical techniques from the journal''s website, by a QR (quick response) code located in the article, or via YouTube. ICUrology provides current and highly relevant knowledge to a broad audience at the cutting edge of urological research and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信