Electrical Storm in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pierre Groussin, Melvyn Dezecot, Donovan Decaudin, Dominique Pavin, Sandro Ninni, Cédric Klein, Pierre Ollitrault, Laure Champ Rigot, Jonaz Font, Antoine Da Costa, Jean-Marc Sellal, Néfissa Hammache, Alexandre Salaun, Charles Guenancia, Philippe Mabo, Karim Benali, Raphaël Martins
{"title":"Electrical Storm in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Pierre Groussin, Melvyn Dezecot, Donovan Decaudin, Dominique Pavin, Sandro Ninni, Cédric Klein, Pierre Ollitrault, Laure Champ Rigot, Jonaz Font, Antoine Da Costa, Jean-Marc Sellal, Néfissa Hammache, Alexandre Salaun, Charles Guenancia, Philippe Mabo, Karim Benali, Raphaël Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.06.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic strategies for electrical storm (ES) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not well defined, yet this population is at risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to analyze acute management, in-hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes of patients with HCM experiencing ES.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study retrospectively enrolled patients with ES complicating HCM between 2017 and 2023 in 6 tertiary centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients were included (mean age 61.5 ± 15.2 years, 73.9% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 50% ± 14%). Five patients (22%) had an apical aneurysm. Ten (43.4%) patients had a history of VA, including 3 with previous ES. The majority of VAs were monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (18 patients [78%]). Most patients received amiodarone (n = 20 [87%]) and beta-blockers (n = 16 [70%]). For 10 patients (44%), a radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed (including 2 endo-epicardial ablations), resulting in negative programmed ventricular stimulation in 4 patients. During their hospital management, 8 patients experienced recurrences of VA (2 [25%] previously ablated and 6 [75%] nonablated). Two (9%) patients died during the index hospitalization and 4 other patients died following discharge (median follow-up 18 months). Seven patients (30%) experienced recurrences of arrhythmias, including 4 who had undergone ablation. Radiofrequency ablation was not associated with better outcomes (recurrence rate or overall survival) in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ES in HCM frequently resolves using antiarrhythmic drugs. Many patients will present with VA recurrences. Long-term outcomes were poor, and one-fourth of the patients ended up dying at 18 months. Further studies are warranted to better analyze radiofrequency outcomes in this specific population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.06.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic strategies for electrical storm (ES) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are not well defined, yet this population is at risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze acute management, in-hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes of patients with HCM experiencing ES.

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively enrolled patients with ES complicating HCM between 2017 and 2023 in 6 tertiary centers.

Results: Twenty-three patients were included (mean age 61.5 ± 15.2 years, 73.9% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 50% ± 14%). Five patients (22%) had an apical aneurysm. Ten (43.4%) patients had a history of VA, including 3 with previous ES. The majority of VAs were monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (18 patients [78%]). Most patients received amiodarone (n = 20 [87%]) and beta-blockers (n = 16 [70%]). For 10 patients (44%), a radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed (including 2 endo-epicardial ablations), resulting in negative programmed ventricular stimulation in 4 patients. During their hospital management, 8 patients experienced recurrences of VA (2 [25%] previously ablated and 6 [75%] nonablated). Two (9%) patients died during the index hospitalization and 4 other patients died following discharge (median follow-up 18 months). Seven patients (30%) experienced recurrences of arrhythmias, including 4 who had undergone ablation. Radiofrequency ablation was not associated with better outcomes (recurrence rate or overall survival) in this study.

Conclusions: ES in HCM frequently resolves using antiarrhythmic drugs. Many patients will present with VA recurrences. Long-term outcomes were poor, and one-fourth of the patients ended up dying at 18 months. Further studies are warranted to better analyze radiofrequency outcomes in this specific population.

肥厚性心肌病患者的电风暴。
背景:肥厚性心肌病(HCM)患者电风暴(ES)的治疗策略尚未明确,但这一人群存在室性心律失常(VAs)的风险。目的:本研究的目的是分析HCM合并ES患者的急性管理、住院死亡率和长期结局。方法:这项多中心研究回顾性纳入了2017年至2023年间6个三级中心的ES合并HCM患者。结果:纳入23例患者,平均年龄61.5±15.2岁,男性73.9%,左室射血分数50%±14%。5例患者(22%)有根尖动脉瘤。10例(43.4%)患者有VA病史,其中3例既往有ES病史。绝大多数VAs为单形态室性心动过速(18例[78%])。大多数患者接受胺碘酮(n = 20[87%])和β受体阻滞剂(n = 16[70%])治疗。10例患者(44%)行射频导管消融(包括2例心外膜内消融),4例患者程序性心室刺激阴性。在住院治疗期间,8例患者复发(2例[25%]先前消融,6例[75%]未消融)。2例(9%)患者在住院期间死亡,另外4例患者在出院后死亡(中位随访18个月)。7例(30%)患者出现心律失常复发,其中4例行消融术。在这项研究中,射频消融与更好的结果(复发率或总生存率)无关。结论:HCM的ES常通过抗心律失常药物得到缓解。许多患者会出现静脉曲张复发。长期结果很差,四分之一的患者最终在18个月时死亡。需要进一步的研究来更好地分析这一特定人群的射频治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信