Draft horses have similar outcomes as nondraft horses presenting for colic at a referral institution in Atlantic Canada.

IF 1.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jennifer J Burns, Jason Stull, Emily John, Aimie Doyle
{"title":"Draft horses have similar outcomes as nondraft horses presenting for colic at a referral institution in Atlantic Canada.","authors":"Jennifer J Burns, Jason Stull, Emily John, Aimie Doyle","doi":"10.2460/javma.25.05.0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>For horses presenting for colic to a referral hospital in Atlantic Canada, we aimed to describe clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome for draft breeds; identify associations between clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome for draft compared to nondraft breeds; and identify the overall impact of draft breed on mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of equine colic cases presenting to the Atlantic Veterinary College (2004 to 2023). Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between parameters and draft breed and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 721 horse colic events were included in the study; 68 (9.4%) were categorized as draft breeds. Among draft breeds, large intestine nonstrangulating obstruction was the most frequent diagnosis (30.9%), followed by GI-related medical (23.5%) and open (19.1%). Draft breeds did not significantly differ from nondraft breeds in the type of management received (medical or surgical). At admission, draft breeds were significantly more likely to have an increased heart rate and elevated abdominal protein, peripheral lactate, total protein, and fibrinogen concentrations. Fifty-nine percent of draft breed cases survived until discharge. In multivariable analysis, draft breeds did not significantly differ from nondraft breeds in survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although draft breeds presenting with colic were more likely than nondraft breeds to present with variables associated with nonsurvival, draft breed status was not an overall predictor for nonsurvival at this referral institution.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study describes the clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for draft breeds experiencing colic at a referral institution. Draft breed status was not a predictor for nonsurvival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.05.0320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: For horses presenting for colic to a referral hospital in Atlantic Canada, we aimed to describe clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome for draft breeds; identify associations between clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome for draft compared to nondraft breeds; and identify the overall impact of draft breed on mortality.

Methods: A retrospective review of equine colic cases presenting to the Atlantic Veterinary College (2004 to 2023). Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between parameters and draft breed and mortality.

Results: A total of 721 horse colic events were included in the study; 68 (9.4%) were categorized as draft breeds. Among draft breeds, large intestine nonstrangulating obstruction was the most frequent diagnosis (30.9%), followed by GI-related medical (23.5%) and open (19.1%). Draft breeds did not significantly differ from nondraft breeds in the type of management received (medical or surgical). At admission, draft breeds were significantly more likely to have an increased heart rate and elevated abdominal protein, peripheral lactate, total protein, and fibrinogen concentrations. Fifty-nine percent of draft breed cases survived until discharge. In multivariable analysis, draft breeds did not significantly differ from nondraft breeds in survival.

Conclusions: Although draft breeds presenting with colic were more likely than nondraft breeds to present with variables associated with nonsurvival, draft breed status was not an overall predictor for nonsurvival at this referral institution.

Clinical relevance: This study describes the clinical findings, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for draft breeds experiencing colic at a referral institution. Draft breed status was not a predictor for nonsurvival.

在加拿大大西洋地区的一个转诊机构,役用马和非役用马表现为疝气的结果相似。
目的:在加拿大大西洋地区的一家转诊医院,我们的目的是描述马匹的临床表现、诊断、治疗和结果;确定与非选秀品种相比,选秀品种的临床表现、诊断、治疗和结果之间的联系;并确定草案品种对死亡率的总体影响。方法:对2004 - 2023年大西洋兽医学院收治的马绞痛病例进行回顾性分析。采用Logistic回归模型评估参数与役畜品种和死亡率之间的关系。结果:本研究共纳入721例马绞痛事件;68只(9.4%)属于役用品种。在draft品种中,大肠非绞窄性梗阻是最常见的诊断(30.9%),其次是gi相关的医学(23.5%)和开放(19.1%)。兵役品种与非兵役品种在接受的管理类型(医疗或手术)方面没有显着差异。在入院时,役畜品种明显更有可能出现心率加快和腹部蛋白、外周乳酸、总蛋白和纤维蛋白原浓度升高。59%的役畜病例存活到退役。在多变量分析中,役畜品种与非役畜品种的存活率没有显著差异。结论:尽管与非征兵品种相比,出现绞痛的征兵品种更有可能出现与无法生存相关的变量,但在该转诊机构,征兵品种状况并不是无法生存的总体预测因素。临床相关性:本研究描述了在转诊机构经历肠绞痛的役畜的临床发现、诊断、治疗和结果。选秀品种状况不是不能生存的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信