Diagnostic efficiency of pan-immune-inflammation value to predict diabetic macular edema and its relationship with OCT-based biomarkers of inflammation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ozlem Candan, Gözde Orman, Nurten Ünlü, Güner Ozkan
{"title":"Diagnostic efficiency of pan-immune-inflammation value to predict diabetic macular edema and its relationship with OCT-based biomarkers of inflammation.","authors":"Ozlem Candan, Gözde Orman, Nurten Ünlü, Güner Ozkan","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03733-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to ascertain the predictive value of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in the diagnosis of diabetic macular oedema (DME) and to analyse the relationship between PIV and inflammatory markers on optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 155 patients were included in this observational study: 40 had diabetes without retinopathy, 60 had DME, and 55 were selected as healthy controls. All participants had a complete blood count. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and PIV were calculated and compared. Multivariable regression models were used to further investigate the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers and other biomarkers and OCT markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DME group had significantly higher WBC (p < 0.001), monocyte (p = 0.003) and neutrophil counts (p = 0.024). PIV showed the highest sensitivity and area under the curve for predicting patients with DME in ROC curve analysis. The optimal PIV cut-off value was > 427.69 to distinguish patients with DME from healthy controls, and > 451.29 from diabetic patients without DR. In the regression analysis, HRF count was associated with PIV (p = 0.036), CMT (p = 0.005), and BCVA (p < 0.001). Additionally, the presence of SRF was associated with WBC (p = 0.043), PIV (p = 0.013), CMT (p = 0.007), and BCVA (p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIV may be a useful marker of systemic neutrophil- and monocyte-mediated inflammation in DME, independent of diabetes duration and HbA1c, though further studies are needed to confirm its clinical utility and define an optimal cut-off value.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03733-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to ascertain the predictive value of pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in the diagnosis of diabetic macular oedema (DME) and to analyse the relationship between PIV and inflammatory markers on optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods: A total of 155 patients were included in this observational study: 40 had diabetes without retinopathy, 60 had DME, and 55 were selected as healthy controls. All participants had a complete blood count. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and PIV were calculated and compared. Multivariable regression models were used to further investigate the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers and other biomarkers and OCT markers.

Results: The DME group had significantly higher WBC (p < 0.001), monocyte (p = 0.003) and neutrophil counts (p = 0.024). PIV showed the highest sensitivity and area under the curve for predicting patients with DME in ROC curve analysis. The optimal PIV cut-off value was > 427.69 to distinguish patients with DME from healthy controls, and > 451.29 from diabetic patients without DR. In the regression analysis, HRF count was associated with PIV (p = 0.036), CMT (p = 0.005), and BCVA (p < 0.001). Additionally, the presence of SRF was associated with WBC (p = 0.043), PIV (p = 0.013), CMT (p = 0.007), and BCVA (p = 0.045).

Conclusion: PIV may be a useful marker of systemic neutrophil- and monocyte-mediated inflammation in DME, independent of diabetes duration and HbA1c, though further studies are needed to confirm its clinical utility and define an optimal cut-off value.

泛免疫炎症值预测糖尿病黄斑水肿的诊断效率及其与基于oct的炎症生物标志物的关系
目的:探讨泛免疫炎症值(PIV)在糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)诊断中的预测价值,并分析PIV与光学相干断层扫描(OCT)炎症标志物的关系。方法:本观察性研究共纳入155例患者,其中糖尿病无视网膜病变患者40例,DME患者60例,健康对照55例。所有参与者都有完整的血液计数。计算并比较中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)和PIV。采用多变量回归模型进一步研究全身性炎症标志物与其他生物标志物和OCT标志物之间的关系。结果:DME组WBC明显高于健康对照组(p 427.69), bbb451.29明显高于无dr的糖尿病患者(p = 0.036)。回归分析显示,HRF计数与PIV (p = 0.036)、CMT (p = 0.005)、BCVA (p)相关。PIV可能是DME中中性粒细胞和单核细胞介导的系统性炎症的有用标记物,独立于糖尿病病程和HbA1c,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实其临床应用并确定最佳临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信