Il Woo Park, Jaeyoung Cho, Mina Kim, Dae-Sung Kyoung, Sang Hoon Song, Juhyun Park
{"title":"The Long-Term Rate of Reoperation After Midurethral Sling Insertion Among Women With Urinary Incontinence: A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Il Woo Park, Jaeyoung Cho, Mina Kim, Dae-Sung Kyoung, Sang Hoon Song, Juhyun Park","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06212-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study evaluated the reoperation rate and risk factors among women who underwent midurethral sling (MUS) insertion for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Reoperation was defined as an additional incontinence procedure due to insufficient benefit from the initial MUS, excluding surgeries for mesh-related complications or device removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 221,082 women aged ≥ 20 years who received MUS between 2009 and 2015 in South Korea. Data from the National Health Insurance Service were used to determine reoperation rates, and Cox regression identified independent risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reoperation rates were 0.8% at 1 year, 2.7% at 5 years, and 4.8% at 12 years. Younger age (< 60 years) was associated with a higher likelihood of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.957, p < 0.001). Overactive bladder (HR 2.308, p < 0.001), neurogenic bladder (HR 2.308, p < 0.001), and diabetes were also significant risk factors. However, diagnoses were based on claims data, potentially leading to misclassification. Variability in surgical expertise and evolving medical practices may further limit generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among 221,082 women undergoing MUS, the long-term reoperation rate was 4.8%. Younger age, overactive bladder, neurogenic bladder, and diabetes were key risk factors. Preoperative assessment of these factors is essential for optimizing patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06212-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: This study evaluated the reoperation rate and risk factors among women who underwent midurethral sling (MUS) insertion for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Reoperation was defined as an additional incontinence procedure due to insufficient benefit from the initial MUS, excluding surgeries for mesh-related complications or device removal.
Methods: We analyzed 221,082 women aged ≥ 20 years who received MUS between 2009 and 2015 in South Korea. Data from the National Health Insurance Service were used to determine reoperation rates, and Cox regression identified independent risk factors.
Results: Reoperation rates were 0.8% at 1 year, 2.7% at 5 years, and 4.8% at 12 years. Younger age (< 60 years) was associated with a higher likelihood of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.957, p < 0.001). Overactive bladder (HR 2.308, p < 0.001), neurogenic bladder (HR 2.308, p < 0.001), and diabetes were also significant risk factors. However, diagnoses were based on claims data, potentially leading to misclassification. Variability in surgical expertise and evolving medical practices may further limit generalizability.
Conclusions: Among 221,082 women undergoing MUS, the long-term reoperation rate was 4.8%. Younger age, overactive bladder, neurogenic bladder, and diabetes were key risk factors. Preoperative assessment of these factors is essential for optimizing patient selection.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion