Atrial Arrhythmia Burden (SMURDEN) After Ablation of AF Is Associated With Improvement in Quality of Life.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ghassan Bidaoui, Han Feng, Chanho Lim, Nour Chouman, Ala Assaf, Mayana Bsoul, Hadi Younes, Christian Massad, Yishi Jia, Yingshou Liu, Mario Mekhael, Charbel Noujaim, Eoin Donnellan, Omar Kreidieh, Amitabh C Pandey, Swati Rao, Nassir F Marrouche
{"title":"Atrial Arrhythmia Burden (SMURDEN) After Ablation of AF Is Associated With Improvement in Quality of Life.","authors":"Ghassan Bidaoui, Han Feng, Chanho Lim, Nour Chouman, Ala Assaf, Mayana Bsoul, Hadi Younes, Christian Massad, Yishi Jia, Yingshou Liu, Mario Mekhael, Charbel Noujaim, Eoin Donnellan, Omar Kreidieh, Amitabh C Pandey, Swati Rao, Nassir F Marrouche","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided fibrosis ablation did not reduce arrhythmia recurrence compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the determinants of symptom and quality of life (QoL) change after PVI with or without MRI-guided ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prespecified DECAAF II (Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation) trial analysis included patients with persistent AF who had symptom severity scores before and after ablation. Patients were provided with a smartphone-based electrocardiography device for single-lead AF burden (SMURDEN) assessment. Participants completed the Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months postablation. Symptom and QoL improvement determinants were explored through univariable and multivariable linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys from 750 patients were analyzed, revealing balanced baseline AFSS and SF-36 scores between the treatment arms (AFSS symptom score: mean ± SD = 12.3 ± 8.2 for PVI and 12.0 ± 8.0 for MRI-guided fibrosis ablation; P = 0.670). Symptoms improved in both arms (AFSS symptom score: 6.8 ± 0.5 for PVI and 7.3 ± 0.5 for MRI-guided fibrosis ablation; P = 0.114). Patients without AF recurrence exhibited greater improvement in most of the SF-36 subcategories and AFSS subcategories (P < 0.05). SMURDEN showed a correlation with QoL improvement and was the only predictor of no improvement or symptom worsening (R = 0.31; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who experienced AF recurrence reported diminished symptom and QoL improvements. SMURDEN emerged as the most significant predictor of symptom improvement and was the only independent factor associated with a lack of improvement or worsening of symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.07.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided fibrosis ablation did not reduce arrhythmia recurrence compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the determinants of symptom and quality of life (QoL) change after PVI with or without MRI-guided ablation.

Methods: This prespecified DECAAF II (Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation) trial analysis included patients with persistent AF who had symptom severity scores before and after ablation. Patients were provided with a smartphone-based electrocardiography device for single-lead AF burden (SMURDEN) assessment. Participants completed the Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months postablation. Symptom and QoL improvement determinants were explored through univariable and multivariable linear models.

Results: Surveys from 750 patients were analyzed, revealing balanced baseline AFSS and SF-36 scores between the treatment arms (AFSS symptom score: mean ± SD = 12.3 ± 8.2 for PVI and 12.0 ± 8.0 for MRI-guided fibrosis ablation; P = 0.670). Symptoms improved in both arms (AFSS symptom score: 6.8 ± 0.5 for PVI and 7.3 ± 0.5 for MRI-guided fibrosis ablation; P = 0.114). Patients without AF recurrence exhibited greater improvement in most of the SF-36 subcategories and AFSS subcategories (P < 0.05). SMURDEN showed a correlation with QoL improvement and was the only predictor of no improvement or symptom worsening (R = 0.31; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Patients who experienced AF recurrence reported diminished symptom and QoL improvements. SMURDEN emerged as the most significant predictor of symptom improvement and was the only independent factor associated with a lack of improvement or worsening of symptoms.

房颤消融后心房心律失常负担(SMURDEN)与生活质量改善相关。
背景:在持续性心房颤动(AF)患者中,磁共振成像(MRI)引导下的纤维化消融与单独肺静脉隔离(PVI)相比并不能减少心律失常复发。目的:本研究的目的是评估PVI伴或不伴mri引导消融后症状和生活质量(QoL)变化的决定因素。方法:这项预先指定的DECAAF II(延迟增强mri引导的纤维化消融与传统导管消融房颤的疗效)试验分析包括在消融前后有症状严重程度评分的持续性房颤患者。为患者提供基于智能手机的心电图设备,用于单导联AF负担评估(SMURDEN)。参与者在基线、消融后3个月和12个月完成房颤症状严重程度(AFSS)和短表36 (SF-36)调查。通过单变量和多变量线性模型探讨症状和生活质量改善的决定因素。结果:对750例患者的调查进行了分析,揭示了治疗组之间平衡的基线AFSS和SF-36评分(AFSS症状评分:PVI的平均±SD = 12.3±8.2,mri引导的纤维化消融的平均±SD = 12.0±8.0;P = 0.670)。两组患者的症状均有改善(AFSS症状评分:PVI组为6.8±0.5,mri引导下纤维化消融组为7.3±0.5;P = 0.114)。无房颤复发患者在SF-36亚分类和AFSS亚分类中的大部分评分均有较大改善(P < 0.05)。SMURDEN与生活质量改善相关,是无改善或症状恶化的唯一预测因子(R = 0.31; P < 0.001)。结论:经历房颤复发的患者报告症状减轻,生活质量改善。SMURDEN成为症状改善的最重要预测因子,是唯一与症状缺乏改善或恶化相关的独立因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信