Vickie Modica, Róbert Glávits, Amy Clewell, John R Endres, Gábor Hirka, Adél Vértesi, Erzsébet Béres, Ilona Pasics Szakonyiné
{"title":"A Comprehensive Toxicological Safety Evaluation of <i>Anaerostipes caccae</i>.","authors":"Vickie Modica, Róbert Glávits, Amy Clewell, John R Endres, Gábor Hirka, Adél Vértesi, Erzsébet Béres, Ilona Pasics Szakonyiné","doi":"10.1177/10915818251367353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Anaerostipes caccae</i> CLB101 (CLB101) is an obligate, anaerobic bacteria that was isolated from the stool of a healthy infant. Due to its ability to produce butyrate and its potential promotion of microbiome health through multiple homeostatic interactions there is interest in its consumption by humans. No toxicity data are publicly available for any strain of <i>A. caccae</i>. Therefore, its genotoxic and toxicological potential was investigated in the current study. Due to its anaerobic nature, a genotoxicity evaluation was performed using the in vivo comet assay and the in vivo mammalian micronucleus assay, which found no evidence of clastogenicity or aneugenicity. General toxicity and potential target organs were assessed in a 90-day, repeated-dose, oral toxicity study using 0, 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Wistar rats. CLB101 exposure did not result in adverse effects in male or female rats when evaluated for clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology, organ weight, and histopathology after administration, at any dose. Therefore, a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, equivalent to 1.9 × 10<sup>11</sup> CFU/kg bw/day for all cells and, based on ∼32% cell viability in the buffer used (Mitsuoka), ∼6.1 × 10<sup>10</sup> CFU/kg bw/d for living cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":14432,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"10915818251367353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818251367353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anaerostipes caccae CLB101 (CLB101) is an obligate, anaerobic bacteria that was isolated from the stool of a healthy infant. Due to its ability to produce butyrate and its potential promotion of microbiome health through multiple homeostatic interactions there is interest in its consumption by humans. No toxicity data are publicly available for any strain of A. caccae. Therefore, its genotoxic and toxicological potential was investigated in the current study. Due to its anaerobic nature, a genotoxicity evaluation was performed using the in vivo comet assay and the in vivo mammalian micronucleus assay, which found no evidence of clastogenicity or aneugenicity. General toxicity and potential target organs were assessed in a 90-day, repeated-dose, oral toxicity study using 0, 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day in Wistar rats. CLB101 exposure did not result in adverse effects in male or female rats when evaluated for clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology, organ weight, and histopathology after administration, at any dose. Therefore, a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, equivalent to 1.9 × 1011 CFU/kg bw/day for all cells and, based on ∼32% cell viability in the buffer used (Mitsuoka), ∼6.1 × 1010 CFU/kg bw/d for living cells.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Toxicology publishes timely, peer-reviewed papers on current topics important to toxicologists. Six bi-monthly issues cover a wide range of topics, including contemporary issues in toxicology, safety assessments, novel approaches to toxicological testing, mechanisms of toxicity, biomarkers, and risk assessment. The Journal also publishes invited reviews on contemporary topics, and features articles based on symposia. In addition, supplemental issues are routinely published on various special topics, including three supplements devoted to contributions from the Cosmetic Review Expert Panel.