Helen Y Zhang, Sarah E Andiman, Antonella M D'Ascanio, Cara L Grimes, Dominique Malacarne Pape
{"title":"Barriers to Effective Treatment of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Qualitative Study on Patient Perspectives on Vaginal Estrogen.","authors":"Helen Y Zhang, Sarah E Andiman, Antonella M D'Ascanio, Cara L Grimes, Dominique Malacarne Pape","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06246-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Vaginal estrogen therapy is widely accepted as a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), yet it is likely underutilized owing to various factors relating to patient perceptions, barriers to access, and health care system outreach. The aim of our study is to explore patient beliefs and opinions regarding its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with patients prescribed vaginal estrogen at an ambulatory urogynecology office between October 2022 and August 2023. Participants completed a symptom inventory followed by a 1:1 in-depth interview based on a structured guide designed to elicit candid insights and detailed responses into perceptions and experiences with vaginal estrogen. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods in a three-phase coding process to identify key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two participants were interviewed. Six major themes emerged: knowledge base, barriers to health care access, motivation for symptom relief, concerns regarding side effects, physician-patient relationship, and barriers to compliance. Although participants understood the connection between GSM and aging, they often felt unclear about which symptoms vaginal estrogen targeted, how to apply it, and how it differed from systemic hormone replacement therapy. Barriers such as cost, lack of insurance coverage, and concerns about cancer were frequently reported. Physician education helped to alleviate fears, improving patient confidence in using vaginal estrogen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified key beliefs and barriers affecting the use of vaginal estrogen for GSM. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education, better physician counseling, and enhanced communication to support adherence to this beneficial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06246-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Vaginal estrogen therapy is widely accepted as a safe and effective treatment for symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), yet it is likely underutilized owing to various factors relating to patient perceptions, barriers to access, and health care system outreach. The aim of our study is to explore patient beliefs and opinions regarding its use.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with patients prescribed vaginal estrogen at an ambulatory urogynecology office between October 2022 and August 2023. Participants completed a symptom inventory followed by a 1:1 in-depth interview based on a structured guide designed to elicit candid insights and detailed responses into perceptions and experiences with vaginal estrogen. Data were analyzed using grounded theory methods in a three-phase coding process to identify key themes.
Results: Twenty-two participants were interviewed. Six major themes emerged: knowledge base, barriers to health care access, motivation for symptom relief, concerns regarding side effects, physician-patient relationship, and barriers to compliance. Although participants understood the connection between GSM and aging, they often felt unclear about which symptoms vaginal estrogen targeted, how to apply it, and how it differed from systemic hormone replacement therapy. Barriers such as cost, lack of insurance coverage, and concerns about cancer were frequently reported. Physician education helped to alleviate fears, improving patient confidence in using vaginal estrogen.
Conclusions: This study identified key beliefs and barriers affecting the use of vaginal estrogen for GSM. These findings highlight the need for improved patient education, better physician counseling, and enhanced communication to support adherence to this beneficial therapy.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion