Clinical outcomes of external radiotherapy boost versus no boost to radiologically positive lymph nodes in FIGO stage IIIC cervical cancer.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Karthik S Rishi, K Harshita, Pilli Spandana, Pradeep Kumar Reddy Donapati, P S Hari, G V Giri
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of external radiotherapy boost versus no boost to radiologically positive lymph nodes in FIGO stage IIIC cervical cancer.","authors":"Karthik S Rishi, K Harshita, Pilli Spandana, Pradeep Kumar Reddy Donapati, P S Hari, G V Giri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The management of lymph node-positive cervical cancer remains controversial, with limited data on outcomes following radiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes in patients who had received an additional boost to radiologically positive lymph nodes versus those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 231 patients with cervical cancer treated between January 2012 and December 2019 and identified as having radiologically positive lymph nodes were sorted into 2 groups: those who had received an external radiotherapy boost and those who had not. Sub-group analyses were performed based on lymph node size and number, as well as receipt of concurrent chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer, predominantly of the squamous sub-type, with a median age of 42.5 years (range; 33-85) and a median follow-up of 11 months (range; 3-119) the median disease-free and overall survival durations were 93 months (range; 6-120) and 84 months (range; 8-120), respectively. The median overall survival was higher in the group that had received an external radiation boost compared with those who had not (107 vs 91 months; P = .01). However, no overall survival benefit from a nodal boost was observed in patients with lymph nodes >2 cm or >4 positive nodes (105 vs 99 months, P = .048; 91 vs 73 months, P = .04, respectively). Concurrent chemotherapy improved median survival by 22 months (P = .023) in the nodal boost group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An external radiation boost was associated with improved overall survival in stage III cervical cancer, particularly in patients with fewer than 4 involved nodes, nodes <2 cm, and those receiving concurrent chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 10","pages":"102030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The management of lymph node-positive cervical cancer remains controversial, with limited data on outcomes following radiotherapy. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes in patients who had received an additional boost to radiologically positive lymph nodes versus those who did not.

Methods: A total of 231 patients with cervical cancer treated between January 2012 and December 2019 and identified as having radiologically positive lymph nodes were sorted into 2 groups: those who had received an external radiotherapy boost and those who had not. Sub-group analyses were performed based on lymph node size and number, as well as receipt of concurrent chemotherapy.

Results: For patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer, predominantly of the squamous sub-type, with a median age of 42.5 years (range; 33-85) and a median follow-up of 11 months (range; 3-119) the median disease-free and overall survival durations were 93 months (range; 6-120) and 84 months (range; 8-120), respectively. The median overall survival was higher in the group that had received an external radiation boost compared with those who had not (107 vs 91 months; P = .01). However, no overall survival benefit from a nodal boost was observed in patients with lymph nodes >2 cm or >4 positive nodes (105 vs 99 months, P = .048; 91 vs 73 months, P = .04, respectively). Concurrent chemotherapy improved median survival by 22 months (P = .023) in the nodal boost group.

Conclusions: An external radiation boost was associated with improved overall survival in stage III cervical cancer, particularly in patients with fewer than 4 involved nodes, nodes <2 cm, and those receiving concurrent chemotherapy.

FIGO IIIC期宫颈癌放疗增强与不增强放射学阳性淋巴结的临床结果
目的:淋巴结阳性宫颈癌的治疗仍然存在争议,放疗后的结果数据有限。在这项回顾性研究中,我们的目的是比较接受了放射学阳性淋巴结额外促进的患者与未接受放射学阳性淋巴结额外促进的患者的临床结果。方法:将2012年1月至2019年12月期间接受治疗的淋巴结放射学阳性的宫颈癌患者231例分为两组:接受外置放疗的患者和未接受外置放疗的患者。亚组分析基于淋巴结大小和数目,以及接受同期化疗。结果:国际妇产联合会IIIC期宫颈癌患者,主要为鳞状亚型,中位年龄42.5岁(范围33-85),中位随访11个月(范围3-119),中位无病生存期和总生存期分别为93个月(范围6-120)和84个月(范围8-120)。接受外放疗组的中位总生存期高于未接受外放疗组(107个月vs 91个月;P = 0.01)。然而,在淋巴结为>2 cm或>4阳性淋巴结的患者中,没有观察到淋巴结增加带来的总体生存获益(105个月vs 99个月,P = 0.048; 91个月vs 73个月,P = 0.04)。同期化疗使淋巴结增强组的中位生存期延长了22个月(P = 0.023)。结论:外照射增强与III期宫颈癌总生存率的提高有关,特别是对于受援淋巴结少于4个的患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信