Marina Mordehachvili Burlá, Beatriz Ximenes Mendes, Lucas Mendes Barbosa, Maria Tsoukas, Roger Haber
{"title":"Rosacea and Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Update.","authors":"Marina Mordehachvili Burlá, Beatriz Ximenes Mendes, Lucas Mendes Barbosa, Maria Tsoukas, Roger Haber","doi":"10.1111/ijd.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between rosacea and migraine is well-recognized, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Emerging evidence suggests potential benefits of anti-migraine treatments for rosacea, highlighting the need for updated insights. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed migraine prevalence in rosacea patients, compared it with non-rosacea populations, and explored influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases for observational studies reporting migraine prevalence or odds ratios (ORs) in rosacea patients. Data were analyzed using random-effects models in R 4.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed via the Cochran Q test, I<sup>2</sup> statistics, prediction intervals (PI), leave-one-out analyses, meta-regressions, and Baujat plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 385 screened studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria, with 112,994 rosacea patients and 4,402,330 non-rosacea participants. The prevalence of migraine in rosacea patients was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15; 0.35, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 99%; 95% PI, 0.00; 0.62), indicating substantial variability across populations. Compared to controls, rosacea patients had nearly twice the odds of migraine (OR = 1.93, 95% CI, 1.42; 2.64, p < 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 98%; 95% PI, 0.67; 5.53), though the wide PI suggests that in some populations, the association may not be significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Qualitative analysis identified erythematotelangiectatic subtype, female gender, age, and severity as potential contributing factors. However, inconsistencies across studies limit definitive conclusions. While we found high migraine prevalence and increased OR in rosacea patients, the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further stratification to enhance risk assessment and treatment strategies considering patient and population-level characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.70048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The association between rosacea and migraine is well-recognized, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Emerging evidence suggests potential benefits of anti-migraine treatments for rosacea, highlighting the need for updated insights. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed migraine prevalence in rosacea patients, compared it with non-rosacea populations, and explored influencing factors.
Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases for observational studies reporting migraine prevalence or odds ratios (ORs) in rosacea patients. Data were analyzed using random-effects models in R 4.4.1. Heterogeneity was assessed via the Cochran Q test, I2 statistics, prediction intervals (PI), leave-one-out analyses, meta-regressions, and Baujat plots.
Results: From 385 screened studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria, with 112,994 rosacea patients and 4,402,330 non-rosacea participants. The prevalence of migraine in rosacea patients was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15; 0.35, p < 0.001, I2 = 99%; 95% PI, 0.00; 0.62), indicating substantial variability across populations. Compared to controls, rosacea patients had nearly twice the odds of migraine (OR = 1.93, 95% CI, 1.42; 2.64, p < 0.001, I2 = 98%; 95% PI, 0.67; 5.53), though the wide PI suggests that in some populations, the association may not be significant.
Conclusions: Qualitative analysis identified erythematotelangiectatic subtype, female gender, age, and severity as potential contributing factors. However, inconsistencies across studies limit definitive conclusions. While we found high migraine prevalence and increased OR in rosacea patients, the substantial heterogeneity underscores the need for further stratification to enhance risk assessment and treatment strategies considering patient and population-level characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education.
The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.