The Consistency of CDC73 Mutation and Parafibromin Staining Loss in Parathyroid Neoplasm: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
International Journal of Endocrinology Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ije/1905585
Jinheng Xiao, Sen Yang, Qingyuan Zheng, Tianqi Chen, Ya Hu
{"title":"The Consistency of <i>CDC73</i> Mutation and Parafibromin Staining Loss in Parathyroid Neoplasm: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jinheng Xiao, Sen Yang, Qingyuan Zheng, Tianqi Chen, Ya Hu","doi":"10.1155/ije/1905585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) caused by parathyroid neoplasm is a common endocrine disorder. Nuclear staining loss of parafibromin, encoded by the <i>CDC73</i> gene, has been shown to be closely related to parathyroid malignancy and poor prognosis. Although previous studies have found that parafibromin staining loss is not always consistent with <i>CDC73</i> mutation, the reasons are still unknown. <b>Methods:</b> Published studies from the PubMed database were searched using the terms \"parafibromin,\" \"<i>CDC73</i>,\" \"<i>HRPT2</i>,\" and \"parathyroid\" to identify eligible studies. Among the included studies, <i>CDC73</i> mutation and parafibromin immunohistochemical (IHC) results for patients with parathyroid neoplasms were reviewed, and possible reasons for the inconsistency between the parafibromin staining loss and <i>CDC73</i> mutation were explored. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 analysis protocol. <b>Results:</b> A total of 299 patients from 32 studies were included in the present review. Inconsistency and consistency between parafibromin staining and <i>CDC73</i>status was observed in 19.40% and 80.60% of patients. Patients in the inconsistency group showed higher level of serum calcium (<i>p</i> = 0.026). Significant difference in the inconsistency rate was found between PC (25.15%) and non-PC group (12.50%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and NGS (8.51%) and non-NGS group (21.43%) (<i>p</i> = 0.006) in multivariate analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> The main reasons for the inconsistency were attributed to the pathological type and sequencing method. More inconsistent results were detected in the PC group and the non-NGS group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13966,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endocrinology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1905585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ije/1905585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) caused by parathyroid neoplasm is a common endocrine disorder. Nuclear staining loss of parafibromin, encoded by the CDC73 gene, has been shown to be closely related to parathyroid malignancy and poor prognosis. Although previous studies have found that parafibromin staining loss is not always consistent with CDC73 mutation, the reasons are still unknown. Methods: Published studies from the PubMed database were searched using the terms "parafibromin," "CDC73," "HRPT2," and "parathyroid" to identify eligible studies. Among the included studies, CDC73 mutation and parafibromin immunohistochemical (IHC) results for patients with parathyroid neoplasms were reviewed, and possible reasons for the inconsistency between the parafibromin staining loss and CDC73 mutation were explored. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 analysis protocol. Results: A total of 299 patients from 32 studies were included in the present review. Inconsistency and consistency between parafibromin staining and CDC73status was observed in 19.40% and 80.60% of patients. Patients in the inconsistency group showed higher level of serum calcium (p = 0.026). Significant difference in the inconsistency rate was found between PC (25.15%) and non-PC group (12.50%) (p < 0.001), and NGS (8.51%) and non-NGS group (21.43%) (p = 0.006) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The main reasons for the inconsistency were attributed to the pathological type and sequencing method. More inconsistent results were detected in the PC group and the non-NGS group.

Abstract Image

甲状旁腺肿瘤中CDC73突变和副纤维蛋白染色丢失的一致性:一项系统综述。
背景:原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(pHPT)是一种常见的内分泌疾病。由CDC73基因编码的parafibromin核染色缺失已被证明与甲状旁腺恶性肿瘤和不良预后密切相关。虽然已有研究发现,对非纤白蛋白染色丢失并不总是与CDC73突变一致,但其原因尚不清楚。方法:使用术语“parafibromin”、“CDC73”、“HRPT2”和“甲状旁腺”从PubMed数据库中检索已发表的研究,以确定符合条件的研究。在纳入的研究中,我们回顾了甲状旁腺肿瘤患者的CDC73突变和parafibromin免疫组化(IHC)结果,并探讨了parafibromin染色丢失与CDC73突变不一致的可能原因。本系统评价是按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020分析方案进行的。结果:本综述共纳入了来自32项研究的299例患者。在19.40%和80.60%的患者中,副纤白蛋白染色与cdc73状态不一致和一致。不一致组患者血清钙水平较高(p = 0.026)。多因素分析显示,PC组(25.15%)与非PC组(12.50%)、NGS组(8.51%)与非NGS组(21.43%)不一致率差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:导致结果不一致的主要原因与病理类型和测序方法有关。在PC组和非ngs组中检测到更多不一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Endocrinology
International Journal of Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Endocrinology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists and clinicians working in basic and translational research. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that provide insights into the endocrine system and its associated diseases at a genomic, molecular, biochemical and cellular level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信