Socioeconomic deprivation and its association with polypharmacy in England: results from a national cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani, Duaa Abdullah Bafail
{"title":"Socioeconomic deprivation and its association with polypharmacy in England: results from a national cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani, Duaa Abdullah Bafail","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01990-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Polypharmacy is a growing public health concern, yet its association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation in England has been under-explored.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether socioeconomic deprivation, measured by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), is associated with polypharmacy among adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed cross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Survey for England, including 1705 adults aged 16+ who completed nurse visits and reported prescribed medication use in the past week. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more prescribed medications. IMD scores were categorised into quintiles (least to most deprived). Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, multimorbidity, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and GP visit frequency. A polynomial contrast test assessed linear trends, and adjusted predicted probabilities were calculated to illustrate the deprivation-polypharmacy gradient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the fully adjusted model, adults residing in the most deprived IMD quintile had significantly higher odds of polypharmacy (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.09-3.04; p = 0.022) compared to those living in the least deprived areas. No statistically significant associations were observed for intermediate quintiles. A polynomial contrast test confirmed a significant linear trend across IMD levels (p = 0.010), indicating that the odds of polypharmacy increased progressively with greater area-level deprivation. This gradient was further illustrated by adjusted predicted probabilities, which rose from 18.3% (95% CI 15.3-21.3%) in the least deprived quintile to 24.6% (95% CI 20.1-29.2%) in the most deprived (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Socioeconomic deprivation is independently associated with polypharmacy, even after adjusting for multimorbidity and other confounders, highlighting persistent health inequalities within England's healthcare system. Targeted strategies, including regular medication reviews and enhanced access to care in deprived communities, may help mitigate risks and promote equity in prescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01990-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Polypharmacy is a growing public health concern, yet its association with area-level socioeconomic deprivation in England has been under-explored.

Aim: To investigate whether socioeconomic deprivation, measured by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), is associated with polypharmacy among adults.

Method: We analysed cross-sectional data from the 2021 Health Survey for England, including 1705 adults aged 16+ who completed nurse visits and reported prescribed medication use in the past week. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of five or more prescribed medications. IMD scores were categorised into quintiles (least to most deprived). Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, multimorbidity, obesity, smoking, alcohol use, and GP visit frequency. A polynomial contrast test assessed linear trends, and adjusted predicted probabilities were calculated to illustrate the deprivation-polypharmacy gradient.

Results: In the fully adjusted model, adults residing in the most deprived IMD quintile had significantly higher odds of polypharmacy (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.09-3.04; p = 0.022) compared to those living in the least deprived areas. No statistically significant associations were observed for intermediate quintiles. A polynomial contrast test confirmed a significant linear trend across IMD levels (p = 0.010), indicating that the odds of polypharmacy increased progressively with greater area-level deprivation. This gradient was further illustrated by adjusted predicted probabilities, which rose from 18.3% (95% CI 15.3-21.3%) in the least deprived quintile to 24.6% (95% CI 20.1-29.2%) in the most deprived (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Socioeconomic deprivation is independently associated with polypharmacy, even after adjusting for multimorbidity and other confounders, highlighting persistent health inequalities within England's healthcare system. Targeted strategies, including regular medication reviews and enhanced access to care in deprived communities, may help mitigate risks and promote equity in prescribing practices.

社会经济剥夺及其与英格兰多药的关系:来自全国横断面调查的结果。
简介:多种用药是一个日益增长的公共卫生问题,但其与区域水平的社会经济剥夺在英格兰的关系尚未充分探讨。目的:调查多重剥夺指数(IMD)衡量的社会经济剥夺是否与成年人的多重用药有关。方法:我们分析了2021年英格兰健康调查的横断面数据,包括1705名16岁以上的成年人,他们在过去一周内完成了护士拜访并报告了处方药的使用情况。多重用药被定义为使用五种或五种以上的处方药。IMD得分分为五分之一(从最贫困到最贫困)。多变量logistic回归估计校正优势比(ORs), 95%置信区间(ci),控制年龄、性别、种族、多病、肥胖、吸烟、饮酒和全科医生就诊频率。多项式对比检验评估了线性趋势,并计算了调整后的预测概率,以说明剥夺-多药梯度。结果:在完全调整后的模型中,与生活在最贫困地区的成年人相比,生活在最贫困地区的成年人服用多种药物的几率明显更高(OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.09-3.04; p = 0.022)。中间五分位数未观察到统计学上显著的关联。多项式对比检验证实了IMD水平之间存在显著的线性趋势(p = 0.010),表明随着区域水平剥夺的增加,多药的几率逐渐增加。调整后的预测概率进一步说明了这一梯度,从最贫困五分之一的18.3% (95% CI 15.3-21.3%)上升到最贫困五分之一的24.6% (95% CI 20.1-29.2%)。结论:即使在调整了多病和其他混杂因素后,社会经济剥夺与多药独立相关,突出了英格兰医疗保健系统中持续存在的健康不平等。有针对性的战略,包括定期药物审查和加强贫困社区获得护理的机会,可能有助于减轻风险和促进处方实践的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信