Integrating Non-Clinical Supports into Care: A Systematic Review of Social Prescribing Referral Pathways for Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Psychosocial Improvement.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2025-08-19 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.9127
Samantha Spanos, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Louise A Ellis, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Charlotte Officer, Yvonne Zurynski
{"title":"Integrating Non-Clinical Supports into Care: A Systematic Review of Social Prescribing Referral Pathways for Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Psychosocial Improvement.","authors":"Samantha Spanos, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Louise A Ellis, Maree Saba, Tanja Schroeder, Charlotte Officer, Yvonne Zurynski","doi":"10.5334/ijic.9127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) involves person-centred integration of non-clinical supports into care, which is critical for addressing mental health and psychosocial needs and enhancing wellbeing. This systematic review evaluated the impact of SP referral pathways on mental health, wellbeing, and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus) were searched for empirical studies of referral pathways to community-based SP interventions targeting mental health, psychosocial factors and/or wellbeing. Data from studies published from January 2010 to April 2024 were extracted; referral pathways, interventions, and their resultant outcomes were synthesised and tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 30 included studies, 27 SP interventions and two main referral pathways were identified, involving providers across health, community, social, and voluntary care sectors. Quantitative outcomes (<i>n</i> = 21, 70%) most frequently measured were wellbeing, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Findings were mixed, and widely varying methodological approaches limited study comparability. Qualitative outcomes (<i>n</i> = 16, 53%) were mostly associated with social interactions (e.g., increased sense of belonging) and self-concepts and feelings (e.g., increased sense of purpose).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Research on SP referral pathways supporting mental health, wellbeing and psychosocial outcomes is proliferating, but high heterogeneity in the evidence base limits conclusive inferences about effectiveness. Standardised quantitative measurement of core outcomes, supplemented by rigorous qualitative designs, will enhance capacity to demonstrate the value of an SP approach to integrated care for mental and psychosocial health and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 3","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) involves person-centred integration of non-clinical supports into care, which is critical for addressing mental health and psychosocial needs and enhancing wellbeing. This systematic review evaluated the impact of SP referral pathways on mental health, wellbeing, and psychosocial outcomes.

Methods: Four databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus) were searched for empirical studies of referral pathways to community-based SP interventions targeting mental health, psychosocial factors and/or wellbeing. Data from studies published from January 2010 to April 2024 were extracted; referral pathways, interventions, and their resultant outcomes were synthesised and tabulated.

Results: Across the 30 included studies, 27 SP interventions and two main referral pathways were identified, involving providers across health, community, social, and voluntary care sectors. Quantitative outcomes (n = 21, 70%) most frequently measured were wellbeing, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Findings were mixed, and widely varying methodological approaches limited study comparability. Qualitative outcomes (n = 16, 53%) were mostly associated with social interactions (e.g., increased sense of belonging) and self-concepts and feelings (e.g., increased sense of purpose).

Discussion and conclusion: Research on SP referral pathways supporting mental health, wellbeing and psychosocial outcomes is proliferating, but high heterogeneity in the evidence base limits conclusive inferences about effectiveness. Standardised quantitative measurement of core outcomes, supplemented by rigorous qualitative designs, will enhance capacity to demonstrate the value of an SP approach to integrated care for mental and psychosocial health and wellbeing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

将非临床支持纳入护理:对心理健康、福祉和社会心理改善的社会处方转诊途径的系统回顾。
社会处方(SP)涉及以人为中心的非临床支持融入护理,这对于解决精神卫生和社会心理需求以及增进福祉至关重要。本系统综述评估了SP转诊途径对心理健康、福祉和社会心理结果的影响。方法:检索四个数据库(Medline, Embase, PsycINFO和Scopus),检索针对心理健康、社会心理因素和/或福祉的社区SP干预转诊途径的实证研究。提取2010年1月至2024年4月发表的研究数据;转诊途径、干预措施及其结果被合成并制成表格。结果:在纳入的30项研究中,确定了27项SP干预措施和两个主要转诊途径,涉及卫生、社区、社会和志愿护理部门的提供者。定量结果(n = 21, 70%)最常测量的是幸福感、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量。结果是混杂的,广泛不同的方法学方法限制了研究的可比性。定性结果(n = 16, 53%)主要与社会互动(例如,归属感增加)和自我概念和感觉(例如,目的感增加)有关。讨论与结论:支持心理健康、福祉和社会心理结果的SP转诊途径的研究正在激增,但证据基础的高度异质性限制了对有效性的结论性推断。核心成果的标准化定量测量,辅以严格的定性设计,将增强能力,以证明精神和社会心理健康和福祉综合护理的SP方法的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信