Comparing listening effort among patients with hearing loss combined with tinnitus, hearing loss alone and a control group.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Zahra Iran Pour Mobarakeh, Vida Rahimi, Elham Tavanai, Marzieh Amiri, Reza Faryadras, Hashir Aazh
{"title":"Comparing listening effort among patients with hearing loss combined with tinnitus, hearing loss alone and a control group.","authors":"Zahra Iran Pour Mobarakeh, Vida Rahimi, Elham Tavanai, Marzieh Amiri, Reza Faryadras, Hashir Aazh","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared listening effort (LE) in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss (HL+Tin), hearing loss alone (HL), and a control group (Control).</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>A case-control study involved 78 adults (aged 20-60). Participants underwent pure tone audiometry, the depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS-21), speech-in-noise test (Quick-SIN), and Stroop test. The Quick-SIN and Stroop tests were taken twice, separately and simultaneously (dual-task paradigm). LE was derived from Stroop test outcomes, measuring selective attention (SA) and reaction time (RT) in dual-task versus baseline conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences emerged in PTA, age, or DASS-21 scores between HL+Tin and HL groups. However, HL+Tin showed higher LE than HL for SA (<i>Padj</i> = 0.049) and RT (<i>Padj</i> = 0.047) with neutral words, but not emotional words (<i>Padj</i> = 0.283, 0.117). For the tinnitus group, regression analyses identified age, depression, and tinnitus severity (THI scores) as significant LE predictors, with age and THI most influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LE is shaped by age, psychological distress, and tinnitus severity, suggesting integrated management of psychological and tinnitus-related factors to ease the cognitive load in listening tasks. Age and THI were consistently associated with greater LE across both SA and RT tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2547939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study compared listening effort (LE) in adults with tinnitus and hearing loss (HL+Tin), hearing loss alone (HL), and a control group (Control).

Design and study sample: A case-control study involved 78 adults (aged 20-60). Participants underwent pure tone audiometry, the depression, anxiety, stress scale (DASS-21), speech-in-noise test (Quick-SIN), and Stroop test. The Quick-SIN and Stroop tests were taken twice, separately and simultaneously (dual-task paradigm). LE was derived from Stroop test outcomes, measuring selective attention (SA) and reaction time (RT) in dual-task versus baseline conditions.

Results: No significant differences emerged in PTA, age, or DASS-21 scores between HL+Tin and HL groups. However, HL+Tin showed higher LE than HL for SA (Padj = 0.049) and RT (Padj = 0.047) with neutral words, but not emotional words (Padj = 0.283, 0.117). For the tinnitus group, regression analyses identified age, depression, and tinnitus severity (THI scores) as significant LE predictors, with age and THI most influential.

Conclusions: LE is shaped by age, psychological distress, and tinnitus severity, suggesting integrated management of psychological and tinnitus-related factors to ease the cognitive load in listening tasks. Age and THI were consistently associated with greater LE across both SA and RT tasks.

比较听力损失合并耳鸣患者、单独听力损失患者和对照组的听力努力。
目的:本研究比较了成人耳鸣合并听力损失(HL+Tin)、单纯听力损失(HL)和对照组(control)的听力努力(LE)。设计和研究样本:一项病例对照研究,涉及78名成年人(20-60岁)。参与者进行了纯音听力测量、抑郁、焦虑、压力量表(DASS-21)、噪音语音测试(Quick-SIN)和Stroop测试。Quick-SIN和Stroop测试分别和同时进行两次(双任务范式)。LE来源于Stroop测试结果,测量双任务条件下与基线条件下的选择性注意(SA)和反应时间(RT)。结果:HL+Tin组与HL组在PTA、年龄、DASS-21评分方面无显著差异。HL+Tin对中性词SA (Padj = 0.049)和RT (Padj = 0.047)的LE均高于HL (Padj = 0.283, 0.117)。对于耳鸣组,回归分析发现年龄、抑郁和耳鸣严重程度(THI评分)是显著的LE预测因子,其中年龄和THI影响最大。结论:LE受年龄、心理困扰和耳鸣严重程度的影响,建议综合管理心理和耳鸣相关因素以减轻听力任务中的认知负荷。在SA和RT任务中,年龄和THI始终与较大的LE相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信