Isaac L Alter, Alexander Chern, Megan E Kuhlmey, Meghan A Despotidis, Scott Kelly, Michael W Denham, Alexis S Leiderman, Anil K Lalwani
{"title":"Bimodal fitting benefits emotional responses to music following unilateral cochlear implantation.","authors":"Isaac L Alter, Alexander Chern, Megan E Kuhlmey, Meghan A Despotidis, Scott Kelly, Michael W Denham, Alexis S Leiderman, Anil K Lalwani","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2025.2547025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate contributions of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids (HAs) towards musical emotion in bimodal (CI and HA together) users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Bimodal implantees and normal-hearing (NH) controls were recruited from a tertiary academic centre and via community outreach. Participants listened to ten musical clips and rated on scales of valence (happiness vs. sadness) and arousal (excitement vs. calm). Primary outcome measures included <i>discrepancy</i> - difference from validated normative ratings for each stimulus - and <i>range</i> - difference between each participant's maximum and minimum rating - of both valence and arousal.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>27 bimodal implantees and 21 NH controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with bimodal listening, participants experienced increased valence discrepancy with CI alone (2.07 vs. 1.86, p = 0.027) and increased arousal discrepancy with HA alone (1.84 vs. 1.60, p = 0.029). Similarly, valence range was lower in the CI-only condition (4.57 vs. 5.40, p = 0.011), and arousal range was lower via HA (4.84 vs. 5.68, p = 0.013). CI listening alone was not significantly different from HA alone for any measured outcome. Bimodal participants performed worse than NH controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bimodal listening has diminished emotional responses to music compared to NH controls, but is superior to HA or CI alone. Our findings support bimodal fitting to enhance musical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2025.2547025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Investigate contributions of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids (HAs) towards musical emotion in bimodal (CI and HA together) users.
Design: Bimodal implantees and normal-hearing (NH) controls were recruited from a tertiary academic centre and via community outreach. Participants listened to ten musical clips and rated on scales of valence (happiness vs. sadness) and arousal (excitement vs. calm). Primary outcome measures included discrepancy - difference from validated normative ratings for each stimulus - and range - difference between each participant's maximum and minimum rating - of both valence and arousal.
Study sample: 27 bimodal implantees and 21 NH controls.
Results: Compared with bimodal listening, participants experienced increased valence discrepancy with CI alone (2.07 vs. 1.86, p = 0.027) and increased arousal discrepancy with HA alone (1.84 vs. 1.60, p = 0.029). Similarly, valence range was lower in the CI-only condition (4.57 vs. 5.40, p = 0.011), and arousal range was lower via HA (4.84 vs. 5.68, p = 0.013). CI listening alone was not significantly different from HA alone for any measured outcome. Bimodal participants performed worse than NH controls.
Conclusions: Bimodal listening has diminished emotional responses to music compared to NH controls, but is superior to HA or CI alone. Our findings support bimodal fitting to enhance musical experience.
目的:探讨人工耳蜗(CI)和助听器(HAs)对双峰(CI和HA)使用者音乐情绪的影响。设计:从高等教育中心和社区外展招募双模植入者和正常听力(NH)对照组。参与者听了十段音乐片段,并根据效价(快乐vs悲伤)和兴奋程度(兴奋vs平静)进行打分。主要的结果测量包括差异-每个刺激的有效标准评级的差异-和范围-每个参与者的效价和唤醒的最大和最小评级之间的差异。研究样本:27例双峰种植体和21例NH对照。结果:与双峰聆听相比,单独CI组的效价差异增加(2.07 vs. 1.86, p = 0.027),单独HA组的唤醒差异增加(1.84 vs. 1.60, p = 0.029)。同样地,仅使用自我意识条件下的效价范围较低(4.57 vs. 5.40, p = 0.011), HA条件下的唤醒范围较低(4.84 vs. 5.68, p = 0.013)。在任何测量结果上,单独CI聆听与单独HA没有显著差异。双峰参与者的表现比NH对照组差。结论:与NH对照组相比,双峰聆听减少了对音乐的情绪反应,但优于HA或单独CI。我们的研究结果支持双峰拟合增强音乐体验。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.