An algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment: medical management, carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ali F Aburahma
{"title":"An algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment: medical management, carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization.","authors":"Ali F Aburahma","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05418-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) has been controversial over the past three decades. In this article an algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment is described whether medical management or a carotid intervention is considered, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), and/or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). This article will summarize the commonly-quoted randomized controlled trials for both TFCAS and CEA which were published over the past two decades for both symptomatic (SxCS) and AsxCS, and create an algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment according to risk stratification. Patients should be classified according to symptomatic status, followed by risk stratification. Patients with <70% AsxCS or <50% SxCS should be treated with best medical therapy alone. However, patients with ≥70% AsxCS and ≥50% SxCS should undergo CEA or TFCAS or TCAR with best medical therapy according to individual risk stratification. These three modalities can be complementary and very helpful in selecting proper therapy according to their risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 3","pages":"195-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05418-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (AsxCS) has been controversial over the past three decades. In this article an algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment is described whether medical management or a carotid intervention is considered, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), and/or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). This article will summarize the commonly-quoted randomized controlled trials for both TFCAS and CEA which were published over the past two decades for both symptomatic (SxCS) and AsxCS, and create an algorithmic approach to patient-specific treatment according to risk stratification. Patients should be classified according to symptomatic status, followed by risk stratification. Patients with <70% AsxCS or <50% SxCS should be treated with best medical therapy alone. However, patients with ≥70% AsxCS and ≥50% SxCS should undergo CEA or TFCAS or TCAR with best medical therapy according to individual risk stratification. These three modalities can be complementary and very helpful in selecting proper therapy according to their risk.

一种针对患者特异性治疗的算法方法:医疗管理、颈动脉内膜切除术、颈动脉支架置入术和经颈动脉重建术。
在过去的三十年中,无症状颈动脉狭窄(AsxCS)的治疗一直存在争议。在这篇文章中,描述了一种针对患者特异性治疗的算法方法,无论是否考虑医疗管理或颈动脉干预,包括颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)、经股颈动脉支架置入术(TFCAS)和/或经颈动脉重建术(TCAR)。本文将总结过去二十年来发表的关于症状性(SxCS)和AsxCS的TFCAS和CEA的随机对照试验,并根据风险分层创建一种针对患者特异性治疗的算法方法。患者应根据症状状况进行分类,然后进行风险分层。患者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信