Francesca Santoro, Marco Sferruzzi, Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Francesco Spinelli, Francesco Stilo, Vincenzo DI Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato
{"title":"Urgent management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a critical review of the literature.","authors":"Francesca Santoro, Marco Sferruzzi, Nunzio Montelione, Vincenzo Catanese, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Francesco Spinelli, Francesco Stilo, Vincenzo DI Lazzaro, Fabio Pilato","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there is a consensus on the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis, the optimal timing of surgery and its role in the context of acute stroke remain controversial. This study aims to review the key factors influencing treatment decisions, including patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, imaging findings and procedural risks associated with acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed a narrative review of the existing literature to summarize current evidence on the indications, timing, and outcomes of CEA and CAS in patients with recent ischemic stroke related to carotid stenosis. 86 articles were identified. After reviewing 10 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome evaluated in all studies was the perioperative day stroke/death rate. Although some discrepancies were found among the studies, CEA showed a stroke/death rate ranging from approximately 1.3% within the first 7 days to 3.6% after 7 days. In contrast, CAS had a higher rate in the early period (8.3%) compared to later (7.1%), highlighting an increased risk of CAS within the first 7 days. Managing symptomatic carotid stenosis requires a careful, individualized approach considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the timing of surgery. Early intervention is beneficial, but patient-specific risk factors must be weighed carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":"44 4","pages":"330-340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05446-X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although there is a consensus on the role of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid stenosis, the optimal timing of surgery and its role in the context of acute stroke remain controversial. This study aims to review the key factors influencing treatment decisions, including patient characteristics, anatomical considerations, imaging findings and procedural risks associated with acute carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS). We performed a narrative review of the existing literature to summarize current evidence on the indications, timing, and outcomes of CEA and CAS in patients with recent ischemic stroke related to carotid stenosis. 86 articles were identified. After reviewing 10 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome evaluated in all studies was the perioperative day stroke/death rate. Although some discrepancies were found among the studies, CEA showed a stroke/death rate ranging from approximately 1.3% within the first 7 days to 3.6% after 7 days. In contrast, CAS had a higher rate in the early period (8.3%) compared to later (7.1%), highlighting an increased risk of CAS within the first 7 days. Managing symptomatic carotid stenosis requires a careful, individualized approach considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, and the timing of surgery. Early intervention is beneficial, but patient-specific risk factors must be weighed carefully.
期刊介绍:
International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).