Effectiveness of tele-counseling for patients with alcohol dependence syndrome - A randomized control trial.

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-22 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_421_24
Pranesh Ram Ranganathan, Raghuthaman Gopal, Sureshkumar Ramasamy
{"title":"Effectiveness of tele-counseling for patients with alcohol dependence syndrome - A randomized control trial.","authors":"Pranesh Ram Ranganathan, Raghuthaman Gopal, Sureshkumar Ramasamy","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_421_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a rising trend of alcohol addiction in our Indian society. Studies from high-income countries have demonstrated the effective usage of mobile phones in delivering psychosocial interventions in the treatment of substance disorders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of Tele-Counseling as a mode of continuing care for patients with alcohol dependence syndrome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An open-label randomized control trial was conducted with 78 male participants. Patients with severe mental disorders or cognitive impairments were excluded. Participants received standard care treatments and were randomly assigned to either the Tele-Continuing Care (TCC) group or the Treatment as Usual (TAU) group. 1) 'Telephone Continuing Care ' group (TCC) who received pro-active contact and counseling through mobile phones from the treatment team on the 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup>, 4<sup>th</sup>, 8<sup>th</sup>, 12<sup>th</sup>, 16<sup>th</sup>, 20<sup>th</sup>, and 24<sup>th</sup> week after discharge. 2) The 'Treatment-As-Usual' group (TAU) received usual outpatient follow-up care. We contacted patients and their caregivers every month over mobile phones, belonging to both groups and collected information regarding drinking status up to one year after discharge. We compared abstinence rates, drinking percentage days, and treatment adherence rates. By including all the variables, we did logistic regression to predict relapse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 41.38 ± 9.06 years, with the majority being married. A higher percentage of patients in the TAU group had higher education qualifications compared to the TCC group. Duration of treatment adherence was significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.017) longer in the TCC group than TAU group (159.83 (120) ±129.47 vs. 100.37 (60) ±112.95) days. Similarly, compliance with abstinence-maintaining medications was better (<i>P</i> = 0.027) in the TCC group than TAU group (142.85 (120) ±115.50 v/s 95.29 (52.5) ±104.42) days. Attendance to group therapy sessions also was better in the TCC group (<i>P</i> = 0.001) compared to the TAU group. However, there was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of abstinence rate at the end of one year (TCC: 61.8% and TAU: 44.4%) and also the drinking percentage days at the end of one year (TCC 28.22% vs. TAU 38.76%). Logistic regression revealed that a Family History of Alcoholism and Poor Drug compliance were found to be significant predictors of relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As Tele-Counselling Care in our study showed partial effectiveness in improving the outcome measures, research should focus on improvising further to strengthen the Tele-Counselling model, especially in resource crunch Low- and Middle-Income countries and this could be included in the armamentarium of alcohol de-addiction program.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"34 2","pages":"264-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_421_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a rising trend of alcohol addiction in our Indian society. Studies from high-income countries have demonstrated the effective usage of mobile phones in delivering psychosocial interventions in the treatment of substance disorders.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of Tele-Counseling as a mode of continuing care for patients with alcohol dependence syndrome.

Materials and methods: An open-label randomized control trial was conducted with 78 male participants. Patients with severe mental disorders or cognitive impairments were excluded. Participants received standard care treatments and were randomly assigned to either the Tele-Continuing Care (TCC) group or the Treatment as Usual (TAU) group. 1) 'Telephone Continuing Care ' group (TCC) who received pro-active contact and counseling through mobile phones from the treatment team on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th, 20th, and 24th week after discharge. 2) The 'Treatment-As-Usual' group (TAU) received usual outpatient follow-up care. We contacted patients and their caregivers every month over mobile phones, belonging to both groups and collected information regarding drinking status up to one year after discharge. We compared abstinence rates, drinking percentage days, and treatment adherence rates. By including all the variables, we did logistic regression to predict relapse.

Results: The mean age of participants was 41.38 ± 9.06 years, with the majority being married. A higher percentage of patients in the TAU group had higher education qualifications compared to the TCC group. Duration of treatment adherence was significantly (P = 0.017) longer in the TCC group than TAU group (159.83 (120) ±129.47 vs. 100.37 (60) ±112.95) days. Similarly, compliance with abstinence-maintaining medications was better (P = 0.027) in the TCC group than TAU group (142.85 (120) ±115.50 v/s 95.29 (52.5) ±104.42) days. Attendance to group therapy sessions also was better in the TCC group (P = 0.001) compared to the TAU group. However, there was no statistical significance between the two groups in terms of abstinence rate at the end of one year (TCC: 61.8% and TAU: 44.4%) and also the drinking percentage days at the end of one year (TCC 28.22% vs. TAU 38.76%). Logistic regression revealed that a Family History of Alcoholism and Poor Drug compliance were found to be significant predictors of relapse.

Conclusion: As Tele-Counselling Care in our study showed partial effectiveness in improving the outcome measures, research should focus on improvising further to strengthen the Tele-Counselling model, especially in resource crunch Low- and Middle-Income countries and this could be included in the armamentarium of alcohol de-addiction program.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

远程咨询对酒精依赖综合征患者的有效性——一项随机对照试验。
背景:在我们印度社会,酒精成瘾呈上升趋势。来自高收入国家的研究表明,在药物障碍治疗中有效使用移动电话提供社会心理干预。目的:评估远程咨询作为酒精依赖综合征患者持续护理模式的有效性。材料与方法:采用开放标签随机对照试验,男性78例。排除有严重精神障碍或认知障碍的患者。参与者接受标准护理治疗,并随机分配到远程持续护理(TCC)组或常规治疗(TAU)组。1)“电话持续护理”组(TCC):出院后第1周、第2周、第4周、第8周、第12周、第16周、第20周、第24周,接受治疗小组积极主动的手机联系和咨询。2)“常规治疗”组(TAU)接受常规门诊随访。我们每月通过手机联系两组患者及其护理人员,并收集出院后一年内的饮酒状况信息。我们比较了戒断率、饮酒天数百分比和治疗依从率。通过纳入所有变量,我们进行了逻辑回归来预测复发。结果:参与者平均年龄为41.38±9.06岁,以已婚居多。与TCC组相比,TAU组中具有高等教育资格的患者比例更高。TCC组治疗依从时间(159.83(120)±129.47)天显著长于TAU组(100.37(60)±112.95)天(P = 0.017)。同样,TCC组的戒断维持药物依从性优于TAU组(142.85(120)±115.50 v/s 95.29(52.5)±104.42)天(P = 0.027)。与TAU组相比,TCC组参加小组治疗会议的情况也更好(P = 0.001)。然而,两组在年终戒酒率(TCC: 61.8%, TAU: 44.4%)和年终饮酒百分比天数(TCC: 28.22%, TAU: 38.76%)方面无统计学意义。逻辑回归显示,酗酒家族史和药物依从性差是复发的重要预测因素。结论:由于我们研究中的远程咨询护理在改善结果测量方面显示出部分有效性,因此研究应侧重于进一步改进以加强远程咨询模式,特别是在资源紧张的中低收入国家,这可以纳入酒精戒除计划的装备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信