Primary angle-closure eyes with ocular hypertension show preperimetric ganglion cell complex abnormalities.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_681_25
Shah Zalak, Sihota Ramanjit, Sen Ray Swarnali, Choudhary Samiksha, Dhillon Jasleen
{"title":"Primary angle-closure eyes with ocular hypertension show preperimetric ganglion cell complex abnormalities.","authors":"Shah Zalak, Sihota Ramanjit, Sen Ray Swarnali, Choudhary Samiksha, Dhillon Jasleen","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_681_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate ganglion cell complex (GCC) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) parameters in subjects with primary angle closure (PAC) without raised intraocular pressure (IOP), PAC eyes with raised IOP, and those with early primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), to ascertain parameters that could identify any early glaucomatous damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational, cross-sectional study of 75 patients with PAC, PAC with ocular hypertension (OHT), and early PACG. GCC analysis was performed by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) using RTVue-100 software, and parameters were compared between these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In eyes with PAC, PAC with OHT and early PACG, the average GCC thickness was 92.49 ± 7.52, 87.69 ± 5.24, and 79.64 ± 8.45 µm; inferior GCC thickness was 92.8 ± 7.84, 88.15 ± 6.13, and 79.59 ± 8.96 µm; and superior GCC thickness was 92.08 ± 7.55, 87.23 ± 5.19, and 79.67 ± 8.82 µm, respectively. There was a significant difference in all parameters between PAC vs PAC OHT eyes (P = 0.001), as also between PAC OHT vs early PACG eyes (P < 0.001). The percentage GCC loss in eyes from PAC to PAC with OHT and from PAC with OHT to early PACG in average GCC was 7.5 ± 3.95% (P = 0.001) and 9.31 ± 8.54% (P < 0.001). pRNFL showed a significant difference in all the parameters between PAC OHT vs early PACG (P < 0.001); however, only the superior pRNFL was significantly different between PAC vs PAC OHT (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAC with OHT showed significant, preperimetric GCC changes that could identify early progression from PAC to PACG and prompt appropriate therapy to prevent morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 9","pages":"1289-1292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_681_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate ganglion cell complex (GCC) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) parameters in subjects with primary angle closure (PAC) without raised intraocular pressure (IOP), PAC eyes with raised IOP, and those with early primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), to ascertain parameters that could identify any early glaucomatous damage.

Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study of 75 patients with PAC, PAC with ocular hypertension (OHT), and early PACG. GCC analysis was performed by spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) using RTVue-100 software, and parameters were compared between these groups.

Results: In eyes with PAC, PAC with OHT and early PACG, the average GCC thickness was 92.49 ± 7.52, 87.69 ± 5.24, and 79.64 ± 8.45 µm; inferior GCC thickness was 92.8 ± 7.84, 88.15 ± 6.13, and 79.59 ± 8.96 µm; and superior GCC thickness was 92.08 ± 7.55, 87.23 ± 5.19, and 79.67 ± 8.82 µm, respectively. There was a significant difference in all parameters between PAC vs PAC OHT eyes (P = 0.001), as also between PAC OHT vs early PACG eyes (P < 0.001). The percentage GCC loss in eyes from PAC to PAC with OHT and from PAC with OHT to early PACG in average GCC was 7.5 ± 3.95% (P = 0.001) and 9.31 ± 8.54% (P < 0.001). pRNFL showed a significant difference in all the parameters between PAC OHT vs early PACG (P < 0.001); however, only the superior pRNFL was significantly different between PAC vs PAC OHT (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: PAC with OHT showed significant, preperimetric GCC changes that could identify early progression from PAC to PACG and prompt appropriate therapy to prevent morbidity.

原发性闭角眼伴高眼压表现为周前神经节细胞复合体异常。
目的:研究无眼压升高的原发性闭角眼(PAC)、IOP升高的原发性闭角眼(PAC)和早期原发性闭角眼(PACG)患者的神经节细胞复体(GCC)和视网膜乳头周围神经纤维层(pRNFL)参数,以确定早期青光眼损伤的参数。方法:这是一项对75例PAC、PAC合并高眼压(OHT)和早期PACG患者的观察性横断面研究。采用RTVue-100软件进行光谱域光学相干层析成像(SD-OCT)进行GCC分析,并比较各组间参数。结果:PAC、PAC合并OHT、早期PACG眼的GCC平均厚度分别为92.49±7.52、87.69±5.24、79.64±8.45µm;劣质GCC厚度分别为92.8±7.84、88.15±6.13和79.59±8.96µm;优越的GCC厚度分别为92.08±7.55、87.23±5.19和79.67±8.82µm。PAC与PAC OHT眼之间的所有参数均有显著差异(P = 0.001), PAC OHT眼与早期PACG眼之间的参数也有显著差异(P < 0.001)。从PAC到PAC合并OHT和PAC合并OHT到早期PACG的平均GCC损失百分比分别为7.5±3.95% (P = 0.001)和9.31±8.54% (P < 0.001)。pRNFL在PAC OHT与早期PACG之间的所有参数均有显著差异(P < 0.001);而PAC与PAC OHT之间只有较优的pRNFL有显著差异(P = 0.01)。结论:PAC合并OHT表现出明显的术前GCC变化,可以识别PAC向PACG的早期进展,并提示适当的治疗以预防发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信