Agreement between rebound (iCare IC200), Goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact (air puff) tonometer in the immediate postoperative period following vitrectomy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_180_25
Sindhushree Rajagopal, Sanjana B Singh, J N Abhijith, Rooshitha B Singh, S M Bejan Singh
{"title":"Agreement between rebound (iCare IC200), Goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact (air puff) tonometer in the immediate postoperative period following vitrectomy.","authors":"Sindhushree Rajagopal, Sanjana B Singh, J N Abhijith, Rooshitha B Singh, S M Bejan Singh","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_180_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), iCare (IC 200) rebound tonometer, and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery in the immediate postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional comparative study included 75 eyes of 75 patients. IOP measurements were obtained in the sitting position using NCT, iCare, and GAT during the first postoperative day. iCare measurements were also obtained in the supine position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average IOP by GAT, NCT, and iCare was 15.6 ± 7.3 mmHg, 16.5 ± 7.2 mmHg, and 15.4 ± 7.8 mmHg, respectively. The intraclass correlation (ICC) for the three tonometers was excellent (>0.9, p < 0.001), except for very high IOPs and very low IOPs, where the agreement was only good to moderate, especially with NCT-GAT (ICC 0.55-0.75) when compared to iCare-GAT (ICC 0.77-0.98). Bland-Altman plot showed GAT-iCare had a better agreement (LoA - 2.40-3.32) than GAT-NCT (LoA - 5.92-4.06). Overall, differences in IOP were within ± 3 mmHg in 88% of eyes for GAT-NCT and 92% for GAT-iCare. The study found a significant difference in IOP values in the supine position (mean IOP = 17.2 ± 9.3) compared to the sitting position (mean IOP = 15.4 ± 7.8) (p < 0.001). Still, no significant difference was observed across different tamponade groups (p = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iCare (IC 200) shows good agreement with GAT as well as NCT in postvitrectomized eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 9","pages":"1269-1275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_180_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), iCare (IC 200) rebound tonometer, and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery in the immediate postoperative period.

Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study included 75 eyes of 75 patients. IOP measurements were obtained in the sitting position using NCT, iCare, and GAT during the first postoperative day. iCare measurements were also obtained in the supine position.

Results: The average IOP by GAT, NCT, and iCare was 15.6 ± 7.3 mmHg, 16.5 ± 7.2 mmHg, and 15.4 ± 7.8 mmHg, respectively. The intraclass correlation (ICC) for the three tonometers was excellent (>0.9, p < 0.001), except for very high IOPs and very low IOPs, where the agreement was only good to moderate, especially with NCT-GAT (ICC 0.55-0.75) when compared to iCare-GAT (ICC 0.77-0.98). Bland-Altman plot showed GAT-iCare had a better agreement (LoA - 2.40-3.32) than GAT-NCT (LoA - 5.92-4.06). Overall, differences in IOP were within ± 3 mmHg in 88% of eyes for GAT-NCT and 92% for GAT-iCare. The study found a significant difference in IOP values in the supine position (mean IOP = 17.2 ± 9.3) compared to the sitting position (mean IOP = 15.4 ± 7.8) (p < 0.001). Still, no significant difference was observed across different tamponade groups (p = 0.109).

Conclusion: The iCare (IC 200) shows good agreement with GAT as well as NCT in postvitrectomized eyes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

玻璃体切除术后即刻反弹眼压计(iCare IC200)、Goldmann压眼压计和非接触式(充气)眼压计的一致性。
目的:比较玻璃体视网膜手术患者术后即刻使用Goldmann眼压计(GAT)、iCare (ic200)反弹眼压计和非接触式眼压计(NCT)测量的眼压(IOP)。方法:对75例患者75只眼进行横断面对比研究。术后第一天使用NCT、iCare和GAT在坐位测量IOP。平卧位时也进行iCare测量。结果:GAT、NCT和iCare的平均眼压分别为15.6±7.3 mmHg、16.5±7.2 mmHg和15.4±7.8 mmHg。三种眼压计的类内相关性(ICC)非常好(>0.9,p < 0.001),除了非常高的IOPs和非常低的IOPs,其中一致性仅为良好至中等,特别是与iCare-GAT (ICC 0.77-0.98)相比,NCT-GAT (ICC 0.55-0.75)。Bland-Altman图显示GAT-iCare的一致性(LoA - 2.40-3.32)优于GAT-NCT (LoA - 5.92-4.06)。总体而言,GAT-NCT组88%的眼睛IOP差异在±3mmhg以内,GAT-iCare组92%的眼睛IOP差异在±3mmhg以内。研究发现,仰卧位的IOP值(平均IOP = 17.2±9.3)与坐位的IOP值(平均IOP = 15.4±7.8)有显著差异(p < 0.001)。不同填塞组间无显著差异(p = 0.109)。结论:iCare (ic200)与GAT及NCT在玻璃体切除后的眼中具有较好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信