Is the FDA regulation of cardiology AI devices supporting cardiovascular innovation: a scoping review.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326307
Ahmed Hussain, Ahmad Guni, Rishikesh Gandhewar, John Warner-Levy, Alexander Davidson, Kamal Shah, Ara Darzi, Hutan Ashrafian
{"title":"Is the FDA regulation of cardiology AI devices supporting cardiovascular innovation: a scoping review.","authors":"Ahmed Hussain, Ahmad Guni, Rishikesh Gandhewar, John Warner-Levy, Alexander Davidson, Kamal Shah, Ara Darzi, Hutan Ashrafian","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have shown immense potential in cardiology, leveraging data-driven insights to enhance diagnosis, treatment planning and patient care. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI/ML devices in cardiology, analysing trends in clinical applications, regulatory pathways and evidence transparency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FDA clearance summaries from the AI/ML medical device database were reviewed to identify cardiology-specific applications. Devices were categorised using the descriptive, diagnostic, predictive and prescriptive framework. Regulatory pathways, AI technologies and validation data were critically assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1016 FDA-approved AI/ML devices, 277 (27.3%) had cardiology applications, predominantly for imaging (65.3%) and diagnostics (64.3%). Predictive and prescriptive tools constituted only 5.4% and 0.7%, respectively. Most devices (97.1%) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway, with 58.0% at risk of predicate creep. Quality of clinical evidence was limited, with only 3.2% of devices supported by high-quality trials. The type of AI technology was often underreported (58.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While AI/ML technologies are reshaping cardiology, regulatory challenges and reporting transparency impede their optimal use. Strengthened regulatory frameworks, improved trial design and robust post-market surveillance are essential to ensure safety, efficacy and equity in the deployment of AI tools in cardiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12835,"journal":{"name":"Heart","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have shown immense potential in cardiology, leveraging data-driven insights to enhance diagnosis, treatment planning and patient care. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AI/ML devices in cardiology, analysing trends in clinical applications, regulatory pathways and evidence transparency.

Methods: FDA clearance summaries from the AI/ML medical device database were reviewed to identify cardiology-specific applications. Devices were categorised using the descriptive, diagnostic, predictive and prescriptive framework. Regulatory pathways, AI technologies and validation data were critically assessed.

Results: Of 1016 FDA-approved AI/ML devices, 277 (27.3%) had cardiology applications, predominantly for imaging (65.3%) and diagnostics (64.3%). Predictive and prescriptive tools constituted only 5.4% and 0.7%, respectively. Most devices (97.1%) were cleared via the 510(k) pathway, with 58.0% at risk of predicate creep. Quality of clinical evidence was limited, with only 3.2% of devices supported by high-quality trials. The type of AI technology was often underreported (58.8%).

Conclusion: While AI/ML technologies are reshaping cardiology, regulatory challenges and reporting transparency impede their optimal use. Strengthened regulatory frameworks, improved trial design and robust post-market surveillance are essential to ensure safety, efficacy and equity in the deployment of AI tools in cardiology.

FDA对支持心血管创新的心脏病学人工智能设备的监管:范围审查。
背景:人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)在心脏病学中显示出巨大的潜力,利用数据驱动的见解来增强诊断、治疗计划和患者护理。本研究对美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的心脏病学AI/ML设备进行了全面评估,分析了临床应用趋势、监管途径和证据透明度。方法:审查AI/ML医疗器械数据库中的FDA许可摘要,以确定心脏病学特异性应用。使用描述性、诊断性、预测性和规范性框架对设备进行分类。对监管途径、人工智能技术和验证数据进行了严格评估。结果:在1016个fda批准的AI/ML设备中,277个(27.3%)具有心脏病学应用,主要用于成像(65.3%)和诊断(64.3%)。预测性和规范性工具分别仅占5.4%和0.7%。大多数器械(97.1%)通过510(k)途径清除,58.0%存在谓词蠕变风险。临床证据的质量有限,只有3.2%的器械得到高质量试验的支持。人工智能技术的类型往往被低估(58.8%)。结论:虽然AI/ML技术正在重塑心脏病学,但监管挑战和报告透明度阻碍了它们的最佳使用。加强监管框架、改进试验设计和强有力的上市后监测对于确保在心脏病学中部署人工智能工具的安全性、有效性和公平性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart
Heart 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart is an international peer reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with important research advances in cardiovascular disease. New scientific developments are highlighted in editorials and put in context with concise review articles. There is one free Editor’s Choice article in each issue, with open access options available to authors for all articles. Education in Heart articles provide a comprehensive, continuously updated, cardiology curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信