The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on static and dynamic posture control in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-08-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1645962
Yaru Wei, Peng Chen, Jianglong Zhan, Lulu Yin, Zhongqi Yu, Lin Wang
{"title":"The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on static and dynamic posture control in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yaru Wei, Peng Chen, Jianglong Zhan, Lulu Yin, Zhongqi Yu, Lin Wang","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1645962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on static and dynamic postural control in older adults, with the goal of providing evidence-based support for tDCS interventions in fall prevention among the elderly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CNKI were searched from their inception to March 11, 2025, covering literature published in all languages. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials or randomized crossover trials assessing the effects of tDCS on static or dynamic postural control in older adults. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, respectively. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore potential moderators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 14 were subjected to meta-analysis. Compared to control conditions, tDCS significantly improved following outcomes in older adults, static postural stability index (APSI<sub>static</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001; MLSI<sub>static</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001; OSI<sub>static</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001), single-leg stance time (<i>p</i> = 0.004), center of pressure (COP) sway area during quiet standing (<i>p</i> = 0.044), COP path length (<i>p</i> = 0.03), dynamic postural stability index (APSI<sub>dynamic</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001; MLSI<sub>dynamic</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001; OSI<sub>dynamic</sub>: <i>p</i> < 0.001), Timed Up and Go test (TUGT; <i>p</i> = 0.003), and stride time variability during walking (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that tDCS efficacy varied according to stimulation site and intervention duration. Meta-regression further revealed that the effect of tDCS on single-leg stance time was influenced by mean age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggested that tDCS can significantly improve static and dynamic postural control in older adults. However, due to the limited number of included studies and substantial heterogeneity observed in some analyses, the current conclusions require further validation through high-quality research. Based on the available evidence, it is recommended that future studies focus on the application of tDCS in fall-prevention interventions among older adults, in order to provide stronger evidence for its implementation in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) (Unique Identifier: [registration number: CRD420251031377]). The protocol is publicly available at: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/].</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1645962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1645962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on static and dynamic postural control in older adults, with the goal of providing evidence-based support for tDCS interventions in fall prevention among the elderly.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CNKI were searched from their inception to March 11, 2025, covering literature published in all languages. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials or randomized crossover trials assessing the effects of tDCS on static or dynamic postural control in older adults. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, respectively. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore potential moderators.

Results: A total of 19 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 14 were subjected to meta-analysis. Compared to control conditions, tDCS significantly improved following outcomes in older adults, static postural stability index (APSIstatic: p < 0.001; MLSIstatic: p < 0.001; OSIstatic: p < 0.001), single-leg stance time (p = 0.004), center of pressure (COP) sway area during quiet standing (p = 0.044), COP path length (p = 0.03), dynamic postural stability index (APSIdynamic: p < 0.001; MLSIdynamic: p < 0.001; OSIdynamic: p < 0.001), Timed Up and Go test (TUGT; p = 0.003), and stride time variability during walking (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that tDCS efficacy varied according to stimulation site and intervention duration. Meta-regression further revealed that the effect of tDCS on single-leg stance time was influenced by mean age.

Conclusion: These findings suggested that tDCS can significantly improve static and dynamic postural control in older adults. However, due to the limited number of included studies and substantial heterogeneity observed in some analyses, the current conclusions require further validation through high-quality research. Based on the available evidence, it is recommended that future studies focus on the application of tDCS in fall-prevention interventions among older adults, in order to provide stronger evidence for its implementation in clinical practice.

Systematic review registration: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) (Unique Identifier: [registration number: CRD420251031377]). The protocol is publicly available at: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/].

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经颅直流电刺激对老年人静态和动态姿势控制的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和meta分析旨在探讨经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对老年人静态和动态姿势控制的影响,为tDCS干预预防老年人跌倒提供循证支持。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus和CNKI自建站至2025年3月11日的所有语种文献。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验或随机交叉试验,评估tDCS对老年人静态或动态姿势控制的影响。纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险分别使用PEDro量表和Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行评估。meta分析采用Stata 14.0,采用随机效应模型。进行亚组分析和元回归来探索潜在的调节因子。结果:系统评价共纳入19项研究,其中14项纳入meta分析。控制条件相比,tDCS显著提高老年人的结果后,静态姿势稳定指数(APSIstatic: p 静态:p 静态:p  = 0.004),压力中心(COP)影响地区在安静的站(p = 0.044),警察路径长度(p = 0.03),动态姿势稳定指数(APSIdynamic: p 动态:p 动态:p  = 0.003),在行走和跨步时间变异性(p 结论:这些发现表明,tDCS可以显著改善老年人的静态和动态姿势控制。然而,由于纳入的研究数量有限,并且在一些分析中观察到很大的异质性,目前的结论需要通过高质量的研究进一步验证。基于现有的证据,建议未来的研究将重点放在tDCS在老年人预防跌倒干预中的应用上,以便为其在临床实践中的实施提供更有力的证据。系统综述注册:本系统综述已在普洛斯彼罗(国际前瞻性系统综述注册)注册(唯一标识符:[注册号:CRD420251031377])。该协议可在[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/]]公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信