Enhancing influenza vaccination uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention strategies.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-23 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2025.2550986
YuNing Wang, YaZhen Zhang, JiaYu Wang, NaiYang Shi, HuaJie Jin, Hui Jin
{"title":"Enhancing influenza vaccination uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention strategies.","authors":"YuNing Wang, YaZhen Zhang, JiaYu Wang, NaiYang Shi, HuaJie Jin, Hui Jin","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2550986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite extensive efforts, global influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal, particularly among high-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search up to April 2023. Experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions on influenza vaccination uptake were included, expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis models were utilized for pooled estimates, with heterogeneity assessed through I<sup>2</sup>. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis includes 180 studies involving 2,390,119 participants and comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of recipient-, provider-, health system-based, and multitarget interventions. Overall, interventions significantly increased vaccination rates, with a pooled RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.21 to 1.32). Notably, provider-based interventions were more effective for healthcare workers (RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.66), whereas recipient-based interventions were more efficacious for pregnant women (RR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.85). Multitarget strategies were the most effective among older adults (RR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.72) and population under age of 18 (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings provide critical insights for optimizing public health strategies, underscoring the need for innovative and tailored approaches to enhance global vaccination uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":"24 1","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2550986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite extensive efforts, global influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal, particularly among high-risk populations.

Research design and methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search up to April 2023. Experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions on influenza vaccination uptake were included, expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis models were utilized for pooled estimates, with heterogeneity assessed through I2. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed.

Results: This meta-analysis includes 180 studies involving 2,390,119 participants and comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of recipient-, provider-, health system-based, and multitarget interventions. Overall, interventions significantly increased vaccination rates, with a pooled RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.21 to 1.32). Notably, provider-based interventions were more effective for healthcare workers (RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.66), whereas recipient-based interventions were more efficacious for pregnant women (RR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.85). Multitarget strategies were the most effective among older adults (RR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.72) and population under age of 18 (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.90).

Conclusions: These findings provide critical insights for optimizing public health strategies, underscoring the need for innovative and tailored approaches to enhance global vaccination uptake.

加强流感疫苗接种:干预策略的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:尽管做出了广泛的努力,但全球流感疫苗接种率仍然不理想,特别是在高危人群中。研究设计和方法:我们进行了全面的文献检索,截止到2023年4月。纳入了评估流感疫苗接种干预措施有效性的实验研究,以95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)表示。随机效应荟萃分析模型用于汇总估计,通过I2评估异质性。进行亚组分析和元回归。结果:该荟萃分析包括180项研究,涉及2,390,119名参与者,并全面评估了基于接受者,提供者,卫生系统和多目标干预措施的有效性。总体而言,干预措施显著提高了疫苗接种率,合并RR为1.26 (95% CI, 1.21至1.32)。值得注意的是,以提供者为基础的干预对医护人员更有效(RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.46至1.66),而以接受者为基础的干预对孕妇更有效(RR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09至1.85)。多靶点策略在老年人(RR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61至2.72)和18岁以下人群(RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23至1.90)中最有效。结论:这些发现为优化公共卫生战略提供了重要见解,强调需要采用创新和量身定制的方法来提高全球疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信