Glasgow coma scale score before prehospital tracheal intubation in trauma vs. nontrauma patients: A multicentre retrospective observational study.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Urs Pietsch, Benedick Satari, Julian Klug, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia, Martin Müller, Lea Weber, Roland Albrecht, Robert Greif, Alexander Fuchs
{"title":"Glasgow coma scale score before prehospital tracheal intubation in trauma vs. nontrauma patients: A multicentre retrospective observational study.","authors":"Urs Pietsch, Benedick Satari, Julian Klug, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia, Martin Müller, Lea Weber, Roland Albrecht, Robert Greif, Alexander Fuchs","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital tracheal intubation intends to provide respiratory support and protect the airway from possible pulmonary aspiration. Trauma guidelines recommend tracheal intubation in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of <9.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesised that in clinical practice, GCS scores before prehospital tracheal intubation are lower in trauma and medical patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Swiss anaesthetist-staffed helicopter emergency medical system between 07 September 2020 and 11 December 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Intubated trauma and nontrauma patients ≥18 years and nonintubated patients with GCS <9 admitted to three tertiary referral Swiss hospitals.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Prehospital tracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation. Association of GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation with length of ventilator days, intensive care unit stay, hospitalisation, and 28-day survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 35 021 missions, of which 401 (335 intubated vs. 66 nonintubated) met inclusion criteria. The median GCS before prehospital tracheal intubation was 4 [IQR 3 to 6] for nontrauma and 6 [3 to 8] for trauma patients. Trauma patients with burns had a GCS score of 14 [13 to 15] before prehospital tracheal intubation. In the trauma cohort, women had a median GCS score of 5 [3 to 7] compared to men with 6 [3 to 8] (P = 0.043). The GCS before prehospital tracheal intubation was associated with length of intensive care unit stay (P = 0.042) and survival (P = 0.036) but not with length of ventilation and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall median GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation was lower than 8. Our data suggests that the GCS score is not suitable as the sole indicator for prehospital tracheal intubation. Further randomised controlled trials should investigate more robust intubation criteria to be included in the guidelines for trauma and nontrauma patients. Finally, a patient-centred approach should be emphasised, especially in patients with burns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehospital tracheal intubation intends to provide respiratory support and protect the airway from possible pulmonary aspiration. Trauma guidelines recommend tracheal intubation in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of <9.

Objectives: We hypothesised that in clinical practice, GCS scores before prehospital tracheal intubation are lower in trauma and medical patients.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting: Swiss anaesthetist-staffed helicopter emergency medical system between 07 September 2020 and 11 December 2023.

Patients: Intubated trauma and nontrauma patients ≥18 years and nonintubated patients with GCS <9 admitted to three tertiary referral Swiss hospitals.

Interventions: Prehospital tracheal intubation.

Main outcome measures: GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation. Association of GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation with length of ventilator days, intensive care unit stay, hospitalisation, and 28-day survival.

Results: We screened 35 021 missions, of which 401 (335 intubated vs. 66 nonintubated) met inclusion criteria. The median GCS before prehospital tracheal intubation was 4 [IQR 3 to 6] for nontrauma and 6 [3 to 8] for trauma patients. Trauma patients with burns had a GCS score of 14 [13 to 15] before prehospital tracheal intubation. In the trauma cohort, women had a median GCS score of 5 [3 to 7] compared to men with 6 [3 to 8] (P = 0.043). The GCS before prehospital tracheal intubation was associated with length of intensive care unit stay (P = 0.042) and survival (P = 0.036) but not with length of ventilation and hospital stay.

Conclusions: Overall median GCS score before prehospital tracheal intubation was lower than 8. Our data suggests that the GCS score is not suitable as the sole indicator for prehospital tracheal intubation. Further randomised controlled trials should investigate more robust intubation criteria to be included in the guidelines for trauma and nontrauma patients. Finally, a patient-centred approach should be emphasised, especially in patients with burns.

Trial registration: N/A.

创伤与非创伤患者院前气管插管前格拉斯哥昏迷评分:一项多中心回顾性观察研究
院前气管插管旨在提供呼吸支持和保护气道免受可能的肺误吸。创伤指南推荐对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为:目的:我们假设在临床实践中,创伤和内科患者院前气管插管前的GCS评分较低。设计:回顾性观察队列研究。背景:2020年9月7日至2023年12月11日期间,配备麻醉师的瑞士直升机紧急医疗系统。患者:≥18岁的创伤和非创伤患者以及非插管GCS患者。干预措施:院前气管插管。主要观察指标:院前气管插管前GCS评分。院前气管插管前GCS评分与呼吸机天数、重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间和28天生存期的关系结果:我们筛选了35 021个任务,其中401个(335个插管对66个非插管)符合纳入标准。非外伤患者院前气管插管前GCS中位数为4 [IQR 3 ~ 6],外伤患者为6[3 ~ 8]。创伤合并烧伤患者院前气管插管前GCS评分为14[13 ~ 15]。在创伤组中,女性的中位GCS评分为5[3 ~ 7],而男性为6 [3 ~ 8](P = 0.043)。院前气管插管前GCS与重症监护病房住院时间(P = 0.042)和生存时间(P = 0.036)相关,但与通气时间和住院时间无关。结论:院前气管插管前GCS评分中位数低于8分。我们的数据表明,GCS评分不适合作为院前气管插管的唯一指标。进一步的随机对照试验应该研究更可靠的插管标准,以纳入创伤和非创伤患者的指南。最后,应强调以患者为中心的方法,特别是对烧伤患者。试验注册:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信